番茄副产品强化肉汉堡的质量和环境影响

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Adriana Lordi , Dario Caro , Alessia Le Rose , Matteo Alessandro Del Nobile , Amalia Conte
{"title":"番茄副产品强化肉汉堡的质量和环境影响","authors":"Adriana Lordi ,&nbsp;Dario Caro ,&nbsp;Alessia Le Rose ,&nbsp;Matteo Alessandro Del Nobile ,&nbsp;Amalia Conte","doi":"10.1016/j.lwt.2025.118182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current paper aims to reveal the benefits of implementing by-products recycling as potential circular economy practice in the food system. To this aim, two different burgers were developed starting from beef and turkey meat, also adding tomato peels and seeds (TPS), as by-products of tomato processing. TPS were properly dehydrated at 50 °C and ground to obtain a fine powder. The burgers were prepared considering two different levels of TPS addition (110 g and 130 g per 600 g of ground meat) and two different solvents (water and semi-skimmed milk) to hydrate the powder. The different products, in addition to two controls, were all assessed for centesimal composition, chemical properties and sensory acceptability. Considering the energy consumption to dehydrate TPS by a proper mathematical model, a fully Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was also applied to estimate the carbon footprint associated with by-product recycling, also comparing this scenario with other two different biowaste treatment options, such as composting and landfilling. All the experimental data recorded on both quality and environmental impact of the burgers were used to elaborate a global quality index <em>(GQI)</em> able to balance pro and cons of by-product addition to meat formulation. Results demonstrated that the fortification with TPS is a valid strategy from the nutritional, chemical and environmental point of view, even though TPS slightly compromised the sensory quality. The <em>GQI</em> allowed defining the burger that best balanced the pro and cons of by-product recycling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":382,"journal":{"name":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 118182"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality and environmental impact of meat burgers fortified with tomato by-products\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Lordi ,&nbsp;Dario Caro ,&nbsp;Alessia Le Rose ,&nbsp;Matteo Alessandro Del Nobile ,&nbsp;Amalia Conte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lwt.2025.118182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The current paper aims to reveal the benefits of implementing by-products recycling as potential circular economy practice in the food system. To this aim, two different burgers were developed starting from beef and turkey meat, also adding tomato peels and seeds (TPS), as by-products of tomato processing. TPS were properly dehydrated at 50 °C and ground to obtain a fine powder. The burgers were prepared considering two different levels of TPS addition (110 g and 130 g per 600 g of ground meat) and two different solvents (water and semi-skimmed milk) to hydrate the powder. The different products, in addition to two controls, were all assessed for centesimal composition, chemical properties and sensory acceptability. Considering the energy consumption to dehydrate TPS by a proper mathematical model, a fully Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was also applied to estimate the carbon footprint associated with by-product recycling, also comparing this scenario with other two different biowaste treatment options, such as composting and landfilling. All the experimental data recorded on both quality and environmental impact of the burgers were used to elaborate a global quality index <em>(GQI)</em> able to balance pro and cons of by-product addition to meat formulation. Results demonstrated that the fortification with TPS is a valid strategy from the nutritional, chemical and environmental point of view, even though TPS slightly compromised the sensory quality. The <em>GQI</em> allowed defining the burger that best balanced the pro and cons of by-product recycling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LWT - Food Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LWT - Food Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643825008667\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643825008667","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在揭示在食品系统中实施副产品回收作为潜在循环经济实践的好处。为此,他们开发了两种不同的汉堡,从牛肉和火鸡肉开始,还添加了西红柿加工的副产品番茄皮和种子(TPS)。将TPS在50℃下适当脱水,研磨成细粉。制作汉堡时考虑了两种不同水平的TPS添加量(每600克碎肉110克和130克)和两种不同的溶剂(水和半脱脂牛奶)来水化粉末。不同的产品,除了两个对照,都评估了百分成分,化学性质和感官可接受性。考虑到TPS脱水过程中的能量消耗,我们采用了一个完整的生命周期评估(LCA)来估算副产品回收的碳足迹,并将该方案与其他两种不同的生物废物处理方案(如堆肥和填埋)进行了比较。所有关于汉堡质量和环境影响的实验数据都被用来制定一个全球质量指数(GQI),该指数能够平衡肉类配方中添加副产品的利弊。结果表明,尽管TPS对感官品质有轻微影响,但从营养、化学和环境的角度来看,TPS是一种有效的强化策略。GQI允许定义最能平衡副产品回收利弊的汉堡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality and environmental impact of meat burgers fortified with tomato by-products
The current paper aims to reveal the benefits of implementing by-products recycling as potential circular economy practice in the food system. To this aim, two different burgers were developed starting from beef and turkey meat, also adding tomato peels and seeds (TPS), as by-products of tomato processing. TPS were properly dehydrated at 50 °C and ground to obtain a fine powder. The burgers were prepared considering two different levels of TPS addition (110 g and 130 g per 600 g of ground meat) and two different solvents (water and semi-skimmed milk) to hydrate the powder. The different products, in addition to two controls, were all assessed for centesimal composition, chemical properties and sensory acceptability. Considering the energy consumption to dehydrate TPS by a proper mathematical model, a fully Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was also applied to estimate the carbon footprint associated with by-product recycling, also comparing this scenario with other two different biowaste treatment options, such as composting and landfilling. All the experimental data recorded on both quality and environmental impact of the burgers were used to elaborate a global quality index (GQI) able to balance pro and cons of by-product addition to meat formulation. Results demonstrated that the fortification with TPS is a valid strategy from the nutritional, chemical and environmental point of view, even though TPS slightly compromised the sensory quality. The GQI allowed defining the burger that best balanced the pro and cons of by-product recycling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LWT - Food Science and Technology
LWT - Food Science and Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1724
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: LWT - Food Science and Technology is an international journal that publishes innovative papers in the fields of food chemistry, biochemistry, microbiology, technology and nutrition. The work described should be innovative either in the approach or in the methods used. The significance of the results either for the science community or for the food industry must also be specified. Contributions written in English are welcomed in the form of review articles, short reviews, research papers, and research notes. Papers featuring animal trials and cell cultures are outside the scope of the journal and will not be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信