改进平豆种植系统:一种评估能源效率和环境影响的多目标遗传算法方法

IF 9.5 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Reza Raeisi , Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi , Hamed Afshari , Ahmad Mohammadi
{"title":"改进平豆种植系统:一种评估能源效率和环境影响的多目标遗传算法方法","authors":"Reza Raeisi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi ,&nbsp;Hamed Afshari ,&nbsp;Ahmad Mohammadi","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bean planting systems are vital in agriculture, especially since beans are a key food source worldwide. Optimizing these systems is essential to improve efficiency and lessen environmental impacts. A study compared flat and strip planting systems for pinto beans, focusing on energy inputs/outputs, environmental effects, and productivity. Energy consumption was measured in MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>: the flat system used 20,067.12 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>, while the strip system used 18,171.76 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>, indicating the latter’s lower energy demand. In terms of output, the flat system produced 3000 kg per hectare (60,000 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>), whereas the strip system yielded 3500 kg (70,000 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>). This highlights that the strip system offers higher productivity with better energy efficiency. Cost analysis showed that producing a ton of pinto beans costs 180.36 USD2013 per ton in the flat system but only 140.31 USD2013 per ton in the strip system, making the latter more economical. Environmental assessments suggest that the strip system has fewer negative impacts on human health and ecosystems, as evidenced by metrics like DALYs and species diversity. Data indicates that the strip planting system consumes less energy overall while providing greater yields, resulting in superior efficiency and net energy gain. Based on these findings, shifting to strip planting could enhance sustainability, reduce resource use, and improve economic outcomes for growers. Overall, the study recommends adopting strip planting for more efficient, eco-friendly bean production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100492"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing pinto bean planting systems: A multi-objective genetic algorithm approach for evaluating energy efficiency and environmental impact\",\"authors\":\"Reza Raeisi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi ,&nbsp;Hamed Afshari ,&nbsp;Ahmad Mohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Bean planting systems are vital in agriculture, especially since beans are a key food source worldwide. Optimizing these systems is essential to improve efficiency and lessen environmental impacts. A study compared flat and strip planting systems for pinto beans, focusing on energy inputs/outputs, environmental effects, and productivity. Energy consumption was measured in MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>: the flat system used 20,067.12 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>, while the strip system used 18,171.76 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>, indicating the latter’s lower energy demand. In terms of output, the flat system produced 3000 kg per hectare (60,000 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>), whereas the strip system yielded 3500 kg (70,000 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>). This highlights that the strip system offers higher productivity with better energy efficiency. Cost analysis showed that producing a ton of pinto beans costs 180.36 USD2013 per ton in the flat system but only 140.31 USD2013 per ton in the strip system, making the latter more economical. Environmental assessments suggest that the strip system has fewer negative impacts on human health and ecosystems, as evidenced by metrics like DALYs and species diversity. Data indicates that the strip planting system consumes less energy overall while providing greater yields, resulting in superior efficiency and net energy gain. Based on these findings, shifting to strip planting could enhance sustainability, reduce resource use, and improve economic outcomes for growers. Overall, the study recommends adopting strip planting for more efficient, eco-friendly bean production.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy nexus\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy nexus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125001330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125001330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

豆类种植系统在农业中至关重要,特别是因为豆类是世界范围内的主要食物来源。优化这些系统对于提高效率和减少环境影响至关重要。一项研究比较了扁豆和条形种植系统,重点关注能源投入/产出、环境影响和生产力。能耗单位为MJ ha-1,平板系统能耗为20,067.12 MJ ha-1,条形系统能耗为18,171.76 MJ ha-1,条形系统能耗较低。就产量而言,扁平系统每公顷产量为3000公斤(60,000 MJ ha-1),而条形系统产量为3500公斤(70,000 MJ ha-1)。这突出表明带钢系统提供了更高的生产率和更好的能源效率。成本分析表明,生产一吨扁豆的成本在扁平系统中为180.36美元/吨,而在条形系统中仅为140.31美元/吨,使条形系统更加经济。环境评估表明,带状系统对人类健康和生态系统的负面影响较小,如DALYs和物种多样性等指标。数据表明,条形种植系统总体上消耗更少的能源,同时提供更高的产量,从而产生更高的效率和净能量增益。基于这些发现,转向带状种植可以提高可持续性,减少资源使用,并改善种植者的经济效益。总的来说,该研究建议采用条形种植,以实现更高效、更环保的豆类生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing pinto bean planting systems: A multi-objective genetic algorithm approach for evaluating energy efficiency and environmental impact
Bean planting systems are vital in agriculture, especially since beans are a key food source worldwide. Optimizing these systems is essential to improve efficiency and lessen environmental impacts. A study compared flat and strip planting systems for pinto beans, focusing on energy inputs/outputs, environmental effects, and productivity. Energy consumption was measured in MJ ha-1: the flat system used 20,067.12 MJ ha-1, while the strip system used 18,171.76 MJ ha-1, indicating the latter’s lower energy demand. In terms of output, the flat system produced 3000 kg per hectare (60,000 MJ ha-1), whereas the strip system yielded 3500 kg (70,000 MJ ha-1). This highlights that the strip system offers higher productivity with better energy efficiency. Cost analysis showed that producing a ton of pinto beans costs 180.36 USD2013 per ton in the flat system but only 140.31 USD2013 per ton in the strip system, making the latter more economical. Environmental assessments suggest that the strip system has fewer negative impacts on human health and ecosystems, as evidenced by metrics like DALYs and species diversity. Data indicates that the strip planting system consumes less energy overall while providing greater yields, resulting in superior efficiency and net energy gain. Based on these findings, shifting to strip planting could enhance sustainability, reduce resource use, and improve economic outcomes for growers. Overall, the study recommends adopting strip planting for more efficient, eco-friendly bean production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信