Caroline E. Vickery , Holly L. Munro , P. Corey Green , Brian D. Strahm
{"title":"探测地下碳储量的变化:火炬松林的统计可行性和未来机会","authors":"Caroline E. Vickery , Holly L. Munro , P. Corey Green , Brian D. Strahm","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The substantial magnitude of belowground carbon (C) stocks suggests that even minor proportional changes in soil C concentrations could significantly affect global carbon budgets. However, measuring stock changes with sufficient statistical confidence proves difficult due to soil C heterogeneity. In the southeastern US, planted loblolly pine forests have extensive potential to manifest background C fluxes through monitoring networks and to modify C flows under intentional management regimes. To understand feasibility of estimating belowground C stocks, we evaluated current knowledge of and ability to detect change in belowground C subpools (<em>i.e.</em>, coarse woody material, O horizon, mineral soil, detritus, fine roots) in planted loblolly pine stands by compiling statistical distributions from existing databases. We performed power analyses to quantify minimum detectable change in each subpool given current sample sizes, as well as minimum sample sizes required to detect desired magnitudes of change with adequate statistical confidence. The mineral soil subpool could report the smallest magnitude of change (12.9 %, power = 0.8, α = 0.05), and smaller changes could be detectable at individual depth increments. No subpool had enough measures to detect change < 10 % across the region (power = 0.8, α < 0.2). At minimum, tens of thousands more samples (>2200 % sampling increase, power = 0.8, α ≤ 0.2) would be needed to detect the smaller stock changes (<em>i.e.</em>, 2 %) across the species’ native range in which current monitoring and market frameworks are interested. Measurement gaps highlight pools for prioritized monitoring. Lack of statistical power associated with all pools necessitates greater data collection, reconsideration of statistical conventions, or examination of alternative approaches to conclusive change detection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"595 ","pages":"Article 122970"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting change in belowground carbon stocks: Statistical feasibility and future opportunities from loblolly pine forests\",\"authors\":\"Caroline E. Vickery , Holly L. Munro , P. Corey Green , Brian D. Strahm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The substantial magnitude of belowground carbon (C) stocks suggests that even minor proportional changes in soil C concentrations could significantly affect global carbon budgets. However, measuring stock changes with sufficient statistical confidence proves difficult due to soil C heterogeneity. In the southeastern US, planted loblolly pine forests have extensive potential to manifest background C fluxes through monitoring networks and to modify C flows under intentional management regimes. To understand feasibility of estimating belowground C stocks, we evaluated current knowledge of and ability to detect change in belowground C subpools (<em>i.e.</em>, coarse woody material, O horizon, mineral soil, detritus, fine roots) in planted loblolly pine stands by compiling statistical distributions from existing databases. We performed power analyses to quantify minimum detectable change in each subpool given current sample sizes, as well as minimum sample sizes required to detect desired magnitudes of change with adequate statistical confidence. The mineral soil subpool could report the smallest magnitude of change (12.9 %, power = 0.8, α = 0.05), and smaller changes could be detectable at individual depth increments. No subpool had enough measures to detect change < 10 % across the region (power = 0.8, α < 0.2). At minimum, tens of thousands more samples (>2200 % sampling increase, power = 0.8, α ≤ 0.2) would be needed to detect the smaller stock changes (<em>i.e.</em>, 2 %) across the species’ native range in which current monitoring and market frameworks are interested. Measurement gaps highlight pools for prioritized monitoring. Lack of statistical power associated with all pools necessitates greater data collection, reconsideration of statistical conventions, or examination of alternative approaches to conclusive change detection.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":\"595 \",\"pages\":\"Article 122970\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725004785\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725004785","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Detecting change in belowground carbon stocks: Statistical feasibility and future opportunities from loblolly pine forests
The substantial magnitude of belowground carbon (C) stocks suggests that even minor proportional changes in soil C concentrations could significantly affect global carbon budgets. However, measuring stock changes with sufficient statistical confidence proves difficult due to soil C heterogeneity. In the southeastern US, planted loblolly pine forests have extensive potential to manifest background C fluxes through monitoring networks and to modify C flows under intentional management regimes. To understand feasibility of estimating belowground C stocks, we evaluated current knowledge of and ability to detect change in belowground C subpools (i.e., coarse woody material, O horizon, mineral soil, detritus, fine roots) in planted loblolly pine stands by compiling statistical distributions from existing databases. We performed power analyses to quantify minimum detectable change in each subpool given current sample sizes, as well as minimum sample sizes required to detect desired magnitudes of change with adequate statistical confidence. The mineral soil subpool could report the smallest magnitude of change (12.9 %, power = 0.8, α = 0.05), and smaller changes could be detectable at individual depth increments. No subpool had enough measures to detect change < 10 % across the region (power = 0.8, α < 0.2). At minimum, tens of thousands more samples (>2200 % sampling increase, power = 0.8, α ≤ 0.2) would be needed to detect the smaller stock changes (i.e., 2 %) across the species’ native range in which current monitoring and market frameworks are interested. Measurement gaps highlight pools for prioritized monitoring. Lack of statistical power associated with all pools necessitates greater data collection, reconsideration of statistical conventions, or examination of alternative approaches to conclusive change detection.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.