{"title":"爆炸荷载作用下LNG全容罐性能评价","authors":"Yong Yang, Tuanhai Chen, Kezheng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Explosive blast is a critical accidental scenario for liquefied natural gas (LNG) full-containment tanks, necessitating rigorous structural safety assessments. This study explored a method for evaluating the performance of LNG full-containment tanks subjected to explosive blast waves. The coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian technique in ABAQUS was used to simulate blast-wave propagation and resulting structural responses. The method was validated using empirical formulas and experimental data. A 270,000-m<sup>3</sup> LNG full-containment tank was analyzed as a case study, and the explosion overpressure and structural responses at various locations on the tank were assessed. This study further examined the effects of detonation height and distance on tank performance using structural damage to the outer concrete wall of the tank as an evaluation indicator. Results indicated that the zone of elevated blast overpressure was primarily confined to a vertical range extending up to twice the detonation height and a horizontal angular spread of ±10° from the blast epicenter. The peak structural response of the tank was observed with a noticeable delay after the maximum explosion overpressure was applied, reflecting the tank's dynamic reaction to the sudden blast loading. The prestressing system significantly enhanced the tank blast resistance. Greater detonation heights caused more severe damage to the LNG tank and increased explosive distances reduced the damage. However, an explosion source located too low caused excessive damage to the foundation slab. Therefore, the detonation height should not be less than 0.3 times the outer wall height. These findings support safer design and risk mitigation strategies for LNG storage facilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 105735"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance assessment of LNG full-containment tank under explosive blast loading\",\"authors\":\"Yong Yang, Tuanhai Chen, Kezheng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Explosive blast is a critical accidental scenario for liquefied natural gas (LNG) full-containment tanks, necessitating rigorous structural safety assessments. This study explored a method for evaluating the performance of LNG full-containment tanks subjected to explosive blast waves. The coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian technique in ABAQUS was used to simulate blast-wave propagation and resulting structural responses. The method was validated using empirical formulas and experimental data. A 270,000-m<sup>3</sup> LNG full-containment tank was analyzed as a case study, and the explosion overpressure and structural responses at various locations on the tank were assessed. This study further examined the effects of detonation height and distance on tank performance using structural damage to the outer concrete wall of the tank as an evaluation indicator. Results indicated that the zone of elevated blast overpressure was primarily confined to a vertical range extending up to twice the detonation height and a horizontal angular spread of ±10° from the blast epicenter. The peak structural response of the tank was observed with a noticeable delay after the maximum explosion overpressure was applied, reflecting the tank's dynamic reaction to the sudden blast loading. The prestressing system significantly enhanced the tank blast resistance. Greater detonation heights caused more severe damage to the LNG tank and increased explosive distances reduced the damage. However, an explosion source located too low caused excessive damage to the foundation slab. Therefore, the detonation height should not be less than 0.3 times the outer wall height. These findings support safer design and risk mitigation strategies for LNG storage facilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105735\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025001937\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025001937","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance assessment of LNG full-containment tank under explosive blast loading
Explosive blast is a critical accidental scenario for liquefied natural gas (LNG) full-containment tanks, necessitating rigorous structural safety assessments. This study explored a method for evaluating the performance of LNG full-containment tanks subjected to explosive blast waves. The coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian technique in ABAQUS was used to simulate blast-wave propagation and resulting structural responses. The method was validated using empirical formulas and experimental data. A 270,000-m3 LNG full-containment tank was analyzed as a case study, and the explosion overpressure and structural responses at various locations on the tank were assessed. This study further examined the effects of detonation height and distance on tank performance using structural damage to the outer concrete wall of the tank as an evaluation indicator. Results indicated that the zone of elevated blast overpressure was primarily confined to a vertical range extending up to twice the detonation height and a horizontal angular spread of ±10° from the blast epicenter. The peak structural response of the tank was observed with a noticeable delay after the maximum explosion overpressure was applied, reflecting the tank's dynamic reaction to the sudden blast loading. The prestressing system significantly enhanced the tank blast resistance. Greater detonation heights caused more severe damage to the LNG tank and increased explosive distances reduced the damage. However, an explosion source located too low caused excessive damage to the foundation slab. Therefore, the detonation height should not be less than 0.3 times the outer wall height. These findings support safer design and risk mitigation strategies for LNG storage facilities.
期刊介绍:
The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.