{"title":"构变、语法化与汉语极端结果语构网的定量分析","authors":"Yuanmeng Liu , Na Liu , Fuyin Thomas Li","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2025.104017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study uses a quantitative approach to examine the constructional variation and constructional network of Mandarin extreme degree resultatives, focusing on [VP/AP-SI/TOU/HUAI]. In these constructions, SI ‘die’, TOU ‘penetrate’ and HUAI ‘go bad’ are categorized as extreme complements of degree. Although sharing general form and meaning, they exhibit distinct collocational preferences. The findings reveal a shift in the prototype of extreme degree resultatives, with [VP/AP-TOU-<em>le</em>] and [VP/AP-HUAI-<em>le</em>] expanding their collocational scopes, while [VP/AP-SI-<em>le</em>] shows the lowest productivity along with its higher degree of grammaticalization. Additionally, the study extends the network of extreme complements of degree to include 55 new members and explores the interactions between complements and constructions. The results suggest a developmental trajectory for extreme degree resultatives and highlight the need for further research on their diachronic relationships and the influence of original meanings on predicate selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47955,"journal":{"name":"Lingua","volume":"326 ","pages":"Article 104017"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructional variation, grammaticalization, and constructional network of extreme degree resultatives in Mandarin: A quantitative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yuanmeng Liu , Na Liu , Fuyin Thomas Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lingua.2025.104017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study uses a quantitative approach to examine the constructional variation and constructional network of Mandarin extreme degree resultatives, focusing on [VP/AP-SI/TOU/HUAI]. In these constructions, SI ‘die’, TOU ‘penetrate’ and HUAI ‘go bad’ are categorized as extreme complements of degree. Although sharing general form and meaning, they exhibit distinct collocational preferences. The findings reveal a shift in the prototype of extreme degree resultatives, with [VP/AP-TOU-<em>le</em>] and [VP/AP-HUAI-<em>le</em>] expanding their collocational scopes, while [VP/AP-SI-<em>le</em>] shows the lowest productivity along with its higher degree of grammaticalization. Additionally, the study extends the network of extreme complements of degree to include 55 new members and explores the interactions between complements and constructions. The results suggest a developmental trajectory for extreme degree resultatives and highlight the need for further research on their diachronic relationships and the influence of original meanings on predicate selection.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lingua\",\"volume\":\"326 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lingua\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384125001421\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384125001421","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究以[VP/AP-SI/TOU/HUAI]为研究对象,采用定量分析的方法对汉语极端程度结果语的结构变异和结构网络进行了研究。在这些构式中,SI“死”、TOU“透”和淮“坏”被归类为程度的极端补语。虽然具有一般的形式和意义,但它们表现出不同的搭配偏好。结果表明,极端程度结果语的原型发生了变化,[VP/ ap - toui -le]和[VP/ ap - huaie -le]扩展了它们的搭配范围,而[VP/AP-SI-le]表现出最低的生产力和更高的语法化程度。此外,本研究将极端程度补语网络扩展到55个新成员,并探讨了补语与结构之间的相互作用。结果表明了极端程度结果语的发展轨迹,并强调需要进一步研究极端程度结果语的历时关系和原意对谓词选择的影响。
Constructional variation, grammaticalization, and constructional network of extreme degree resultatives in Mandarin: A quantitative analysis
This study uses a quantitative approach to examine the constructional variation and constructional network of Mandarin extreme degree resultatives, focusing on [VP/AP-SI/TOU/HUAI]. In these constructions, SI ‘die’, TOU ‘penetrate’ and HUAI ‘go bad’ are categorized as extreme complements of degree. Although sharing general form and meaning, they exhibit distinct collocational preferences. The findings reveal a shift in the prototype of extreme degree resultatives, with [VP/AP-TOU-le] and [VP/AP-HUAI-le] expanding their collocational scopes, while [VP/AP-SI-le] shows the lowest productivity along with its higher degree of grammaticalization. Additionally, the study extends the network of extreme complements of degree to include 55 new members and explores the interactions between complements and constructions. The results suggest a developmental trajectory for extreme degree resultatives and highlight the need for further research on their diachronic relationships and the influence of original meanings on predicate selection.
期刊介绍:
Lingua publishes papers of any length, if justified, as well as review articles surveying developments in the various fields of linguistics, and occasional discussions. A considerable number of pages in each issue are devoted to critical book reviews. Lingua also publishes Lingua Franca articles consisting of provocative exchanges expressing strong opinions on central topics in linguistics; The Decade In articles which are educational articles offering the nonspecialist linguist an overview of a given area of study; and Taking up the Gauntlet special issues composed of a set number of papers examining one set of data and exploring whose theory offers the most insight with a minimal set of assumptions and a maximum of arguments.