玉米防治白斑病保产量9年杀菌剂药效数据的定量总结

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
MonalisaC. De Cól , Karla Braga , AdrianoA.P. Custódio , Marcelo G. Canteri , Lucas H. Fantin , Carlos M. Utiamada , Hércules D. Campos , Dagma D. Silva-Araújo , Rodrigo V. Costa , InêsF.U. Yada , Aildson P. Duarte , Alfredo R. Dias , Alexandre A. Costa , AlineG. Carvalho , AnaC. Mochko , André L. Silva , Débora F. Chagas , Dionathan W. Lujan , FernandaC.L. Medeiros , Fernanda C. Juliatti , Emerson M. Del Ponte
{"title":"玉米防治白斑病保产量9年杀菌剂药效数据的定量总结","authors":"MonalisaC. De Cól ,&nbsp;Karla Braga ,&nbsp;AdrianoA.P. Custódio ,&nbsp;Marcelo G. Canteri ,&nbsp;Lucas H. Fantin ,&nbsp;Carlos M. Utiamada ,&nbsp;Hércules D. Campos ,&nbsp;Dagma D. Silva-Araújo ,&nbsp;Rodrigo V. Costa ,&nbsp;InêsF.U. Yada ,&nbsp;Aildson P. Duarte ,&nbsp;Alfredo R. Dias ,&nbsp;Alexandre A. Costa ,&nbsp;AlineG. Carvalho ,&nbsp;AnaC. Mochko ,&nbsp;André L. Silva ,&nbsp;Débora F. Chagas ,&nbsp;Dionathan W. Lujan ,&nbsp;FernandaC.L. Medeiros ,&nbsp;Fernanda C. Juliatti ,&nbsp;Emerson M. Del Ponte","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Maize white spot (MWS) is one of the most damaging foliar diseases affecting maize production in Brazil, frequently leading to substantial yield losses. To assess how different fungicide chemistry influences disease control and yield response, we analyzed data from 87 independent field trials conducted over a nine-year period (2016–2024) across five Brazilian states and Distrito Federal. Eight fungicide treatments were included, each evaluated in at least 19 trials where disease severity was estimated. Two treatments involved solo active ingredients (MANCozeb and ChLORothalonil), while six were premix formulations (DIFenoconazole + PYDIflumetofen, PYRAclostrobin + EPOXiconazole, PYRAclostrobin + FLUXapyroxad, AZOxystrobin + TEBUconazole + MANCozeb, PYRAclostrobin + FLUXapyroxad + MEFEntrifluconazole, and TRiFloXystrobin + PROThioconazole + BIXafen). Percent control, estimated by back-transformation from a log-scale network meta-analysis, ranged from 53.2 % to 71.3 %. All treatments, except PYRA + EPOX and MANC, achieved mean efficacy values above 60 %. Yield responses from three sequential fungicide applications ranged from 694 to 1081 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, with the highest increases observed for DIF + PYDI, PYRA + FLUX + MEFE, and TRFX + PROT + BIX. These findings, derived from nearly a decade of field research, reinforce the importance of fungicide applications in reducing maize white spot severity and protecting yield. Moreover, they support current resistance management strategies that advocate for the combination of site-specific and multisite fungicides to optimize disease control and sustain long-term effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative summary of nine years of fungicide efficacy data for managing white spot and protecting yield in maize\",\"authors\":\"MonalisaC. De Cól ,&nbsp;Karla Braga ,&nbsp;AdrianoA.P. Custódio ,&nbsp;Marcelo G. Canteri ,&nbsp;Lucas H. Fantin ,&nbsp;Carlos M. Utiamada ,&nbsp;Hércules D. Campos ,&nbsp;Dagma D. Silva-Araújo ,&nbsp;Rodrigo V. Costa ,&nbsp;InêsF.U. Yada ,&nbsp;Aildson P. Duarte ,&nbsp;Alfredo R. Dias ,&nbsp;Alexandre A. Costa ,&nbsp;AlineG. Carvalho ,&nbsp;AnaC. Mochko ,&nbsp;André L. Silva ,&nbsp;Débora F. Chagas ,&nbsp;Dionathan W. Lujan ,&nbsp;FernandaC.L. Medeiros ,&nbsp;Fernanda C. Juliatti ,&nbsp;Emerson M. Del Ponte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Maize white spot (MWS) is one of the most damaging foliar diseases affecting maize production in Brazil, frequently leading to substantial yield losses. To assess how different fungicide chemistry influences disease control and yield response, we analyzed data from 87 independent field trials conducted over a nine-year period (2016–2024) across five Brazilian states and Distrito Federal. Eight fungicide treatments were included, each evaluated in at least 19 trials where disease severity was estimated. Two treatments involved solo active ingredients (MANCozeb and ChLORothalonil), while six were premix formulations (DIFenoconazole + PYDIflumetofen, PYRAclostrobin + EPOXiconazole, PYRAclostrobin + FLUXapyroxad, AZOxystrobin + TEBUconazole + MANCozeb, PYRAclostrobin + FLUXapyroxad + MEFEntrifluconazole, and TRiFloXystrobin + PROThioconazole + BIXafen). Percent control, estimated by back-transformation from a log-scale network meta-analysis, ranged from 53.2 % to 71.3 %. All treatments, except PYRA + EPOX and MANC, achieved mean efficacy values above 60 %. Yield responses from three sequential fungicide applications ranged from 694 to 1081 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, with the highest increases observed for DIF + PYDI, PYRA + FLUX + MEFE, and TRFX + PROT + BIX. These findings, derived from nearly a decade of field research, reinforce the importance of fungicide applications in reducing maize white spot severity and protecting yield. Moreover, they support current resistance management strategies that advocate for the combination of site-specific and multisite fungicides to optimize disease control and sustain long-term effectiveness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002315\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002315","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

玉米白斑病(MWS)是影响巴西玉米生产的最具破坏性的叶面病害之一,经常导致大量产量损失。为了评估不同的杀菌剂化学成分如何影响疾病控制和产量反应,我们分析了在巴西5个州和联邦地区进行的为期9年(2016-2024年)的87项独立田间试验的数据。包括8种杀菌剂治疗,每种治疗至少在19项试验中评估,并估计疾病严重程度。两种处理采用单用有效成分(MANCozeb和百菌清),六种处理采用预混制剂(双非诺康唑+吡二氟甲氧芬、吡唑啉酯+环氧康唑、吡唑啉酯+氟沙唑、氮唑啉酯+ TEBUconazole + MANCozeb、吡唑啉酯+氟沙唑+甲苯三氟康唑、三氟唑啉酯+原硫康唑+ BIXafen)。通过对数尺度网络元分析的反向转换估计,控制率从53.2%到71.3%不等。除PYRA + EPOX和MANC外,所有治疗的平均有效率均在60%以上。三种连续施用杀菌剂的产量响应范围为694 ~ 1081 kg ha - 1,其中DIF + PYDI、PYRA + FLUX + MEFE和TRFX + PROT + BIX增产幅度最大。这些发现来自近十年的实地研究,强调了杀菌剂在降低玉米白斑严重程度和保护产量方面的重要性。此外,它们支持当前的耐药性管理战略,即主张结合特定位点和多位点杀菌剂,以优化疾病控制并保持长期有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative summary of nine years of fungicide efficacy data for managing white spot and protecting yield in maize
Maize white spot (MWS) is one of the most damaging foliar diseases affecting maize production in Brazil, frequently leading to substantial yield losses. To assess how different fungicide chemistry influences disease control and yield response, we analyzed data from 87 independent field trials conducted over a nine-year period (2016–2024) across five Brazilian states and Distrito Federal. Eight fungicide treatments were included, each evaluated in at least 19 trials where disease severity was estimated. Two treatments involved solo active ingredients (MANCozeb and ChLORothalonil), while six were premix formulations (DIFenoconazole + PYDIflumetofen, PYRAclostrobin + EPOXiconazole, PYRAclostrobin + FLUXapyroxad, AZOxystrobin + TEBUconazole + MANCozeb, PYRAclostrobin + FLUXapyroxad + MEFEntrifluconazole, and TRiFloXystrobin + PROThioconazole + BIXafen). Percent control, estimated by back-transformation from a log-scale network meta-analysis, ranged from 53.2 % to 71.3 %. All treatments, except PYRA + EPOX and MANC, achieved mean efficacy values above 60 %. Yield responses from three sequential fungicide applications ranged from 694 to 1081 kg ha−1, with the highest increases observed for DIF + PYDI, PYRA + FLUX + MEFE, and TRFX + PROT + BIX. These findings, derived from nearly a decade of field research, reinforce the importance of fungicide applications in reducing maize white spot severity and protecting yield. Moreover, they support current resistance management strategies that advocate for the combination of site-specific and multisite fungicides to optimize disease control and sustain long-term effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信