MonalisaC. De Cól , Karla Braga , AdrianoA.P. Custódio , Marcelo G. Canteri , Lucas H. Fantin , Carlos M. Utiamada , Hércules D. Campos , Dagma D. Silva-Araújo , Rodrigo V. Costa , InêsF.U. Yada , Aildson P. Duarte , Alfredo R. Dias , Alexandre A. Costa , AlineG. Carvalho , AnaC. Mochko , André L. Silva , Débora F. Chagas , Dionathan W. Lujan , FernandaC.L. Medeiros , Fernanda C. Juliatti , Emerson M. Del Ponte
{"title":"玉米防治白斑病保产量9年杀菌剂药效数据的定量总结","authors":"MonalisaC. De Cól , Karla Braga , AdrianoA.P. Custódio , Marcelo G. Canteri , Lucas H. Fantin , Carlos M. Utiamada , Hércules D. Campos , Dagma D. Silva-Araújo , Rodrigo V. Costa , InêsF.U. Yada , Aildson P. Duarte , Alfredo R. Dias , Alexandre A. Costa , AlineG. Carvalho , AnaC. Mochko , André L. Silva , Débora F. Chagas , Dionathan W. Lujan , FernandaC.L. Medeiros , Fernanda C. Juliatti , Emerson M. Del Ponte","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Maize white spot (MWS) is one of the most damaging foliar diseases affecting maize production in Brazil, frequently leading to substantial yield losses. To assess how different fungicide chemistry influences disease control and yield response, we analyzed data from 87 independent field trials conducted over a nine-year period (2016–2024) across five Brazilian states and Distrito Federal. Eight fungicide treatments were included, each evaluated in at least 19 trials where disease severity was estimated. Two treatments involved solo active ingredients (MANCozeb and ChLORothalonil), while six were premix formulations (DIFenoconazole + PYDIflumetofen, PYRAclostrobin + EPOXiconazole, PYRAclostrobin + FLUXapyroxad, AZOxystrobin + TEBUconazole + MANCozeb, PYRAclostrobin + FLUXapyroxad + MEFEntrifluconazole, and TRiFloXystrobin + PROThioconazole + BIXafen). Percent control, estimated by back-transformation from a log-scale network meta-analysis, ranged from 53.2 % to 71.3 %. All treatments, except PYRA + EPOX and MANC, achieved mean efficacy values above 60 %. Yield responses from three sequential fungicide applications ranged from 694 to 1081 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, with the highest increases observed for DIF + PYDI, PYRA + FLUX + MEFE, and TRFX + PROT + BIX. These findings, derived from nearly a decade of field research, reinforce the importance of fungicide applications in reducing maize white spot severity and protecting yield. Moreover, they support current resistance management strategies that advocate for the combination of site-specific and multisite fungicides to optimize disease control and sustain long-term effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative summary of nine years of fungicide efficacy data for managing white spot and protecting yield in maize\",\"authors\":\"MonalisaC. De Cól , Karla Braga , AdrianoA.P. Custódio , Marcelo G. Canteri , Lucas H. Fantin , Carlos M. Utiamada , Hércules D. Campos , Dagma D. Silva-Araújo , Rodrigo V. Costa , InêsF.U. Yada , Aildson P. Duarte , Alfredo R. Dias , Alexandre A. Costa , AlineG. Carvalho , AnaC. Mochko , André L. Silva , Débora F. Chagas , Dionathan W. Lujan , FernandaC.L. Medeiros , Fernanda C. Juliatti , Emerson M. Del Ponte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Maize white spot (MWS) is one of the most damaging foliar diseases affecting maize production in Brazil, frequently leading to substantial yield losses. To assess how different fungicide chemistry influences disease control and yield response, we analyzed data from 87 independent field trials conducted over a nine-year period (2016–2024) across five Brazilian states and Distrito Federal. Eight fungicide treatments were included, each evaluated in at least 19 trials where disease severity was estimated. Two treatments involved solo active ingredients (MANCozeb and ChLORothalonil), while six were premix formulations (DIFenoconazole + PYDIflumetofen, PYRAclostrobin + EPOXiconazole, PYRAclostrobin + FLUXapyroxad, AZOxystrobin + TEBUconazole + MANCozeb, PYRAclostrobin + FLUXapyroxad + MEFEntrifluconazole, and TRiFloXystrobin + PROThioconazole + BIXafen). Percent control, estimated by back-transformation from a log-scale network meta-analysis, ranged from 53.2 % to 71.3 %. All treatments, except PYRA + EPOX and MANC, achieved mean efficacy values above 60 %. Yield responses from three sequential fungicide applications ranged from 694 to 1081 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, with the highest increases observed for DIF + PYDI, PYRA + FLUX + MEFE, and TRFX + PROT + BIX. These findings, derived from nearly a decade of field research, reinforce the importance of fungicide applications in reducing maize white spot severity and protecting yield. Moreover, they support current resistance management strategies that advocate for the combination of site-specific and multisite fungicides to optimize disease control and sustain long-term effectiveness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002315\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002315","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantitative summary of nine years of fungicide efficacy data for managing white spot and protecting yield in maize
Maize white spot (MWS) is one of the most damaging foliar diseases affecting maize production in Brazil, frequently leading to substantial yield losses. To assess how different fungicide chemistry influences disease control and yield response, we analyzed data from 87 independent field trials conducted over a nine-year period (2016–2024) across five Brazilian states and Distrito Federal. Eight fungicide treatments were included, each evaluated in at least 19 trials where disease severity was estimated. Two treatments involved solo active ingredients (MANCozeb and ChLORothalonil), while six were premix formulations (DIFenoconazole + PYDIflumetofen, PYRAclostrobin + EPOXiconazole, PYRAclostrobin + FLUXapyroxad, AZOxystrobin + TEBUconazole + MANCozeb, PYRAclostrobin + FLUXapyroxad + MEFEntrifluconazole, and TRiFloXystrobin + PROThioconazole + BIXafen). Percent control, estimated by back-transformation from a log-scale network meta-analysis, ranged from 53.2 % to 71.3 %. All treatments, except PYRA + EPOX and MANC, achieved mean efficacy values above 60 %. Yield responses from three sequential fungicide applications ranged from 694 to 1081 kg ha−1, with the highest increases observed for DIF + PYDI, PYRA + FLUX + MEFE, and TRFX + PROT + BIX. These findings, derived from nearly a decade of field research, reinforce the importance of fungicide applications in reducing maize white spot severity and protecting yield. Moreover, they support current resistance management strategies that advocate for the combination of site-specific and multisite fungicides to optimize disease control and sustain long-term effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.