评价舌下神经刺激器长期使用和长期依从性的变化。

IF 2
Nicholas R Lenze, Dania Alazawi, Meghan Dailey, Christopher Brown, Paul T Hoff, Cathy A Goldstein
{"title":"评价舌下神经刺激器长期使用和长期依从性的变化。","authors":"Nicholas R Lenze, Dania Alazawi, Meghan Dailey, Christopher Brown, Paul T Hoff, Cathy A Goldstein","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03415-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluate patient phenotypes and longitudinal patterns of hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) use and identify predictors of long-term HGNS adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent HGNS implantation for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) from 2017 to 2023 and had available data through 9 months post-device activation were included. Adherence rate was defined as percentage of patients using the device for at least 4 h for 70% of nights. Repeated measures ANOVA and Cochran's Q tests were used to analyze changes in HGNS use over time. A k-means clustering analysis was used to identify HGNS user subgroups with shared characteristics and associations with HGNS use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 59 patients were included, with a mean (SD) age of 62.7 (11.2) years, mean (SD) body mass index of 28.5 kg/m2 (3.2), and an average pre-operative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 38.7 events/hour; the majority were male (78%) and White (98.3%). Patients used their HGNS devices on average for 81.1% of nights (SD 23.5%) and 362 min/night (SD 115), with 0.96 (SD 1.4) pauses/night at 9 months post-activation. The mean percentage of nights and the time/night used decreased significantly over the first 9 months (p < 0.001 for both), while pauses/night increased (p = 0.008). The estimated adherence rate was 52.5% at 9 months. The cluster analysis revealed subgroups with shared characteristics; however, clusters were not associated with HGNS use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HGNS use appears to decrease over the first nine months after activation. Additional research is warranted to investigate drivers of HGNS use decrement. Given lack of a standardized definition for adherence, future studies should report more granular HGNS use metrics to facilitate comparison across studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520777,"journal":{"name":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","volume":"29 4","pages":"249"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating changes in hypoglossal nerve stimulator use over time and long-term adherence.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas R Lenze, Dania Alazawi, Meghan Dailey, Christopher Brown, Paul T Hoff, Cathy A Goldstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11325-025-03415-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluate patient phenotypes and longitudinal patterns of hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) use and identify predictors of long-term HGNS adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent HGNS implantation for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) from 2017 to 2023 and had available data through 9 months post-device activation were included. Adherence rate was defined as percentage of patients using the device for at least 4 h for 70% of nights. Repeated measures ANOVA and Cochran's Q tests were used to analyze changes in HGNS use over time. A k-means clustering analysis was used to identify HGNS user subgroups with shared characteristics and associations with HGNS use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 59 patients were included, with a mean (SD) age of 62.7 (11.2) years, mean (SD) body mass index of 28.5 kg/m2 (3.2), and an average pre-operative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 38.7 events/hour; the majority were male (78%) and White (98.3%). Patients used their HGNS devices on average for 81.1% of nights (SD 23.5%) and 362 min/night (SD 115), with 0.96 (SD 1.4) pauses/night at 9 months post-activation. The mean percentage of nights and the time/night used decreased significantly over the first 9 months (p < 0.001 for both), while pauses/night increased (p = 0.008). The estimated adherence rate was 52.5% at 9 months. The cluster analysis revealed subgroups with shared characteristics; however, clusters were not associated with HGNS use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HGNS use appears to decrease over the first nine months after activation. Additional research is warranted to investigate drivers of HGNS use decrement. Given lack of a standardized definition for adherence, future studies should report more granular HGNS use metrics to facilitate comparison across studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274142/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03415-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03415-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估患者使用舌下神经刺激器(HGNS)的表型和纵向模式,并确定HGNS长期依从性的预测因素。方法:纳入2017年至2023年接受HGNS植入治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的患者,并在设备激活后9个月有可用数据。依从率定义为70%的夜间使用该装置至少4小时的患者百分比。使用重复测量方差分析和科克伦Q检验来分析HGNS使用随时间的变化。采用k-均值聚类分析确定具有共同特征和与HGNS使用相关的HGNS用户亚组。结果:共纳入59例患者,平均(SD)年龄62.7(11.2)岁,平均(SD)体重指数28.5 kg/m2(3.2),平均术前呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI) 38.7事件/小时;大多数是男性(78%)和白人(98.3%)。激活后9个月,患者使用HGNS设备的平均时间为81.1% (SD为23.5%),362分钟/晚(SD为115),暂停时间为0.96 (SD为1.4)。平均夜数百分比和使用的时间/夜数在前9个月内显著下降(p)。结论:HGNS的使用在激活后的前9个月内似乎有所减少。需要进一步的研究来调查HGNS使用减少的驱动因素。鉴于缺乏对依从性的标准化定义,未来的研究应该报告更细粒度的HGNS使用指标,以促进研究之间的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating changes in hypoglossal nerve stimulator use over time and long-term adherence.

Purpose: Evaluate patient phenotypes and longitudinal patterns of hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) use and identify predictors of long-term HGNS adherence.

Methods: Patients who underwent HGNS implantation for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) from 2017 to 2023 and had available data through 9 months post-device activation were included. Adherence rate was defined as percentage of patients using the device for at least 4 h for 70% of nights. Repeated measures ANOVA and Cochran's Q tests were used to analyze changes in HGNS use over time. A k-means clustering analysis was used to identify HGNS user subgroups with shared characteristics and associations with HGNS use.

Results: A total of 59 patients were included, with a mean (SD) age of 62.7 (11.2) years, mean (SD) body mass index of 28.5 kg/m2 (3.2), and an average pre-operative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 38.7 events/hour; the majority were male (78%) and White (98.3%). Patients used their HGNS devices on average for 81.1% of nights (SD 23.5%) and 362 min/night (SD 115), with 0.96 (SD 1.4) pauses/night at 9 months post-activation. The mean percentage of nights and the time/night used decreased significantly over the first 9 months (p < 0.001 for both), while pauses/night increased (p = 0.008). The estimated adherence rate was 52.5% at 9 months. The cluster analysis revealed subgroups with shared characteristics; however, clusters were not associated with HGNS use.

Conclusions: HGNS use appears to decrease over the first nine months after activation. Additional research is warranted to investigate drivers of HGNS use decrement. Given lack of a standardized definition for adherence, future studies should report more granular HGNS use metrics to facilitate comparison across studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信