{"title":"医疗器械中物质介导的热原:神话还是现实?","authors":"Lindsey Borton, Kelly Coleman","doi":"10.14573/altex.2504231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Annex G of ISO 10993-11:2017 lists 24 substances that are allegedly material-mediated pyrogens (MMPs) in medical devices and recommends using the rabbit pyrogen test (RPT) for MMP evaluation. We aimed to establish whether medical devices contain MMPs; determine if MMPs are pyrogens or uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation (UOPs); complete a survey of RPT failures; and develop a UOP screening list. A literature search was conducted to identify MMPs associated with medical devices. Concurrently, data mining was conducted to search for MMPs in medical device extractables databases and collect RPT data from industry and contract research labs. The literature search produced the conclusions: (1) Annex G's endogenous biological compounds are pyrogenic; (2) Annex G's drugs and UOP substances are not pyrogenic but thermogenic; (3) numerous other UOPs were identified; and (4) nearly all UOPs are poorly soluble in saline (the RPT's injection solvent). The data mining found two Annex G MMPs in medical device extracts that were not pyrogenic and confirmed that the RPT failure rate was low, with investigated failures caused by endotoxin or test incompatibilities, not by Annex G MMPs. Since no pyrogenic Annex G MMPs or saline soluble UOPs were found in medical device extracts, the RPT is unnecessary. If UOPs are detected during chemical characterization studies, an ISO 10993-17:2023 toxicological risk assessment can be used to determine their hazard potential. Residual biological contamination can be evaluated with the human monocyte activation test, which detects all biological pyrogens. The term \"MMP\" is inaccurate and obsolete.</p>","PeriodicalId":520550,"journal":{"name":"ALTEX","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material-mediated pyrogens in medical devices: Myth or reality?\",\"authors\":\"Lindsey Borton, Kelly Coleman\",\"doi\":\"10.14573/altex.2504231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Annex G of ISO 10993-11:2017 lists 24 substances that are allegedly material-mediated pyrogens (MMPs) in medical devices and recommends using the rabbit pyrogen test (RPT) for MMP evaluation. We aimed to establish whether medical devices contain MMPs; determine if MMPs are pyrogens or uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation (UOPs); complete a survey of RPT failures; and develop a UOP screening list. A literature search was conducted to identify MMPs associated with medical devices. Concurrently, data mining was conducted to search for MMPs in medical device extractables databases and collect RPT data from industry and contract research labs. The literature search produced the conclusions: (1) Annex G's endogenous biological compounds are pyrogenic; (2) Annex G's drugs and UOP substances are not pyrogenic but thermogenic; (3) numerous other UOPs were identified; and (4) nearly all UOPs are poorly soluble in saline (the RPT's injection solvent). The data mining found two Annex G MMPs in medical device extracts that were not pyrogenic and confirmed that the RPT failure rate was low, with investigated failures caused by endotoxin or test incompatibilities, not by Annex G MMPs. Since no pyrogenic Annex G MMPs or saline soluble UOPs were found in medical device extracts, the RPT is unnecessary. If UOPs are detected during chemical characterization studies, an ISO 10993-17:2023 toxicological risk assessment can be used to determine their hazard potential. Residual biological contamination can be evaluated with the human monocyte activation test, which detects all biological pyrogens. The term \\\"MMP\\\" is inaccurate and obsolete.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ALTEX\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ALTEX\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2504231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALTEX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2504231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
ISO 10993-11:2017附录G列出了医疗器械中据称是材料介导的热原(MMPs)的24种物质,并建议使用兔热原试验(RPT)进行MMP评估。我们的目的是确定医疗器械是否含有MMPs;确定MMPs是热原还是氧化磷酸化解偶联剂(UOPs);完成RPT故障调查;并制定一份UOP筛选清单。进行文献检索以确定与医疗器械相关的MMPs。同时,进行数据挖掘,在医疗器械可提取数据库中搜索MMPs,并从工业和合同研究实验室收集RPT数据。通过文献检索得出结论:(1)附件G的内源性生物化合物为热原性;(2)附件G的药品和UOP物质不是产热性的,而是产热性的;(3)确定了许多其他UOPs;(4)几乎所有的UOPs都难溶于盐水(RPT的注射溶剂)。数据挖掘发现医疗器械提取物中有两个附件G MMPs不具有热原性,并确认RPT失败率很低,所调查的失败是由内毒素或试验不兼容引起的,而不是由附件G MMPs引起的。由于在医疗器械提取物中没有发现热原性附件G MMPs或盐溶性UOPs,因此不需要RPT。如果在化学表征研究中检测到UOPs,可以使用ISO 10993-17:2023毒理学风险评估来确定其潜在危害。残留的生物污染可以用人类单核细胞激活试验来评估,该试验可以检测所有的生物热原。术语“MMP”是不准确和过时的。
Material-mediated pyrogens in medical devices: Myth or reality?
Annex G of ISO 10993-11:2017 lists 24 substances that are allegedly material-mediated pyrogens (MMPs) in medical devices and recommends using the rabbit pyrogen test (RPT) for MMP evaluation. We aimed to establish whether medical devices contain MMPs; determine if MMPs are pyrogens or uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation (UOPs); complete a survey of RPT failures; and develop a UOP screening list. A literature search was conducted to identify MMPs associated with medical devices. Concurrently, data mining was conducted to search for MMPs in medical device extractables databases and collect RPT data from industry and contract research labs. The literature search produced the conclusions: (1) Annex G's endogenous biological compounds are pyrogenic; (2) Annex G's drugs and UOP substances are not pyrogenic but thermogenic; (3) numerous other UOPs were identified; and (4) nearly all UOPs are poorly soluble in saline (the RPT's injection solvent). The data mining found two Annex G MMPs in medical device extracts that were not pyrogenic and confirmed that the RPT failure rate was low, with investigated failures caused by endotoxin or test incompatibilities, not by Annex G MMPs. Since no pyrogenic Annex G MMPs or saline soluble UOPs were found in medical device extracts, the RPT is unnecessary. If UOPs are detected during chemical characterization studies, an ISO 10993-17:2023 toxicological risk assessment can be used to determine their hazard potential. Residual biological contamination can be evaluated with the human monocyte activation test, which detects all biological pyrogens. The term "MMP" is inaccurate and obsolete.