{"title":"基于机器学习的肺癌诊断研究。","authors":"Haihui Huang, Aitong Zhong, Decheng Miao","doi":"10.1177/09287329251358616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIn clinical diagnosis, determining the level of malignancy in tumors and differentiating between benign and malignant tumors are common classification challenges. Accurate and early diagnosis is essential for targeted treatment, and machine learning methods can assist in making these judgments.MethodsThis paper focuses on the classification of the lung tissue as benign or malignant and assessing the degree of aggressiveness in lung cancer. The study employed artificial neural network (ANN), logistic regression, and ridge penalized logistic regression, which are methods without built-in feature selection. Additionally, lasso penalized logistic regression, elastic-net penalized logistic regression, and sparse logistic regression with the hybrid L1/2 + 2 regularization (HLR), which are methods with built-in feature selection, were also utilized.ResultsIn the study on classifying benign and malignant lung tissue, ANN demonstrated the best predictive performance among the methods without built-in feature selection, achieving an average test accuracy of 91.82%. Among the methods with built-in feature selection, HLR outperformed the others with an average test accuracy of 96.67%. When determining the level of malignancy in lung tumors, ANN surpassed other methods without built-in feature selection, attaining an average test accuracy of 84.74%. In comparison, HLR exceeded the performance of other methods with built-in feature selection, reaching an average test accuracy of 93.33%.ConclusionsThe experimental results indicated that HLR with built-in feature selection and ANN without built-in feature selection exhibited strong competitiveness among the methods investigated in both classifying benign and malignant lung tissue and assessing the degree of aggressiveness in lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329251358616"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on lung cancer diagnosis based on machine learning.\",\"authors\":\"Haihui Huang, Aitong Zhong, Decheng Miao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09287329251358616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundIn clinical diagnosis, determining the level of malignancy in tumors and differentiating between benign and malignant tumors are common classification challenges. Accurate and early diagnosis is essential for targeted treatment, and machine learning methods can assist in making these judgments.MethodsThis paper focuses on the classification of the lung tissue as benign or malignant and assessing the degree of aggressiveness in lung cancer. The study employed artificial neural network (ANN), logistic regression, and ridge penalized logistic regression, which are methods without built-in feature selection. Additionally, lasso penalized logistic regression, elastic-net penalized logistic regression, and sparse logistic regression with the hybrid L1/2 + 2 regularization (HLR), which are methods with built-in feature selection, were also utilized.ResultsIn the study on classifying benign and malignant lung tissue, ANN demonstrated the best predictive performance among the methods without built-in feature selection, achieving an average test accuracy of 91.82%. Among the methods with built-in feature selection, HLR outperformed the others with an average test accuracy of 96.67%. When determining the level of malignancy in lung tumors, ANN surpassed other methods without built-in feature selection, attaining an average test accuracy of 84.74%. In comparison, HLR exceeded the performance of other methods with built-in feature selection, reaching an average test accuracy of 93.33%.ConclusionsThe experimental results indicated that HLR with built-in feature selection and ANN without built-in feature selection exhibited strong competitiveness among the methods investigated in both classifying benign and malignant lung tissue and assessing the degree of aggressiveness in lung cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9287329251358616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251358616\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251358616","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Research on lung cancer diagnosis based on machine learning.
BackgroundIn clinical diagnosis, determining the level of malignancy in tumors and differentiating between benign and malignant tumors are common classification challenges. Accurate and early diagnosis is essential for targeted treatment, and machine learning methods can assist in making these judgments.MethodsThis paper focuses on the classification of the lung tissue as benign or malignant and assessing the degree of aggressiveness in lung cancer. The study employed artificial neural network (ANN), logistic regression, and ridge penalized logistic regression, which are methods without built-in feature selection. Additionally, lasso penalized logistic regression, elastic-net penalized logistic regression, and sparse logistic regression with the hybrid L1/2 + 2 regularization (HLR), which are methods with built-in feature selection, were also utilized.ResultsIn the study on classifying benign and malignant lung tissue, ANN demonstrated the best predictive performance among the methods without built-in feature selection, achieving an average test accuracy of 91.82%. Among the methods with built-in feature selection, HLR outperformed the others with an average test accuracy of 96.67%. When determining the level of malignancy in lung tumors, ANN surpassed other methods without built-in feature selection, attaining an average test accuracy of 84.74%. In comparison, HLR exceeded the performance of other methods with built-in feature selection, reaching an average test accuracy of 93.33%.ConclusionsThe experimental results indicated that HLR with built-in feature selection and ANN without built-in feature selection exhibited strong competitiveness among the methods investigated in both classifying benign and malignant lung tissue and assessing the degree of aggressiveness in lung cancer.
期刊介绍:
Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered:
1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables.
2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words.
Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics.
4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors.
5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).