基于机器学习的肺癌诊断研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Haihui Huang, Aitong Zhong, Decheng Miao
{"title":"基于机器学习的肺癌诊断研究。","authors":"Haihui Huang, Aitong Zhong, Decheng Miao","doi":"10.1177/09287329251358616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIn clinical diagnosis, determining the level of malignancy in tumors and differentiating between benign and malignant tumors are common classification challenges. Accurate and early diagnosis is essential for targeted treatment, and machine learning methods can assist in making these judgments.MethodsThis paper focuses on the classification of the lung tissue as benign or malignant and assessing the degree of aggressiveness in lung cancer. The study employed artificial neural network (ANN), logistic regression, and ridge penalized logistic regression, which are methods without built-in feature selection. Additionally, lasso penalized logistic regression, elastic-net penalized logistic regression, and sparse logistic regression with the hybrid L1/2 + 2 regularization (HLR), which are methods with built-in feature selection, were also utilized.ResultsIn the study on classifying benign and malignant lung tissue, ANN demonstrated the best predictive performance among the methods without built-in feature selection, achieving an average test accuracy of 91.82%. Among the methods with built-in feature selection, HLR outperformed the others with an average test accuracy of 96.67%. When determining the level of malignancy in lung tumors, ANN surpassed other methods without built-in feature selection, attaining an average test accuracy of 84.74%. In comparison, HLR exceeded the performance of other methods with built-in feature selection, reaching an average test accuracy of 93.33%.ConclusionsThe experimental results indicated that HLR with built-in feature selection and ANN without built-in feature selection exhibited strong competitiveness among the methods investigated in both classifying benign and malignant lung tissue and assessing the degree of aggressiveness in lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329251358616"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on lung cancer diagnosis based on machine learning.\",\"authors\":\"Haihui Huang, Aitong Zhong, Decheng Miao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09287329251358616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundIn clinical diagnosis, determining the level of malignancy in tumors and differentiating between benign and malignant tumors are common classification challenges. Accurate and early diagnosis is essential for targeted treatment, and machine learning methods can assist in making these judgments.MethodsThis paper focuses on the classification of the lung tissue as benign or malignant and assessing the degree of aggressiveness in lung cancer. The study employed artificial neural network (ANN), logistic regression, and ridge penalized logistic regression, which are methods without built-in feature selection. Additionally, lasso penalized logistic regression, elastic-net penalized logistic regression, and sparse logistic regression with the hybrid L1/2 + 2 regularization (HLR), which are methods with built-in feature selection, were also utilized.ResultsIn the study on classifying benign and malignant lung tissue, ANN demonstrated the best predictive performance among the methods without built-in feature selection, achieving an average test accuracy of 91.82%. Among the methods with built-in feature selection, HLR outperformed the others with an average test accuracy of 96.67%. When determining the level of malignancy in lung tumors, ANN surpassed other methods without built-in feature selection, attaining an average test accuracy of 84.74%. In comparison, HLR exceeded the performance of other methods with built-in feature selection, reaching an average test accuracy of 93.33%.ConclusionsThe experimental results indicated that HLR with built-in feature selection and ANN without built-in feature selection exhibited strong competitiveness among the methods investigated in both classifying benign and malignant lung tissue and assessing the degree of aggressiveness in lung cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9287329251358616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251358616\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251358616","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床诊断中,确定肿瘤的恶性程度和区分良恶性肿瘤是常见的分类难题。准确和早期的诊断对于有针对性的治疗至关重要,机器学习方法可以帮助做出这些判断。方法对肺癌的肺组织进行良性和恶性分类,并对肺癌的侵袭程度进行评价。该研究采用了人工神经网络(ANN)、逻辑回归和脊罚逻辑回归等没有内置特征选择的方法。此外,还利用了lasso惩罚逻辑回归、弹性网络惩罚逻辑回归和混合L1/2 + 2正则化(HLR)稀疏逻辑回归等内置特征选择方法。结果在对肺组织良恶性分类的研究中,人工神经网络在没有内置特征选择的方法中表现出最好的预测性能,平均测试准确率为91.82%。在内置特征选择的方法中,HLR的平均测试准确率为96.67%,优于其他方法。在确定肺肿瘤的恶性程度时,人工神经网络优于其他没有内置特征选择的方法,平均测试准确率为84.74%。相比之下,HLR超过了其他内置特征选择方法的性能,平均测试准确率达到93.33%。结论采用内置特征选择的HLR和不采用内置特征选择的ANN在肺组织良恶性分类和肺癌侵袭程度评估方面具有较强的竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on lung cancer diagnosis based on machine learning.

BackgroundIn clinical diagnosis, determining the level of malignancy in tumors and differentiating between benign and malignant tumors are common classification challenges. Accurate and early diagnosis is essential for targeted treatment, and machine learning methods can assist in making these judgments.MethodsThis paper focuses on the classification of the lung tissue as benign or malignant and assessing the degree of aggressiveness in lung cancer. The study employed artificial neural network (ANN), logistic regression, and ridge penalized logistic regression, which are methods without built-in feature selection. Additionally, lasso penalized logistic regression, elastic-net penalized logistic regression, and sparse logistic regression with the hybrid L1/2 + 2 regularization (HLR), which are methods with built-in feature selection, were also utilized.ResultsIn the study on classifying benign and malignant lung tissue, ANN demonstrated the best predictive performance among the methods without built-in feature selection, achieving an average test accuracy of 91.82%. Among the methods with built-in feature selection, HLR outperformed the others with an average test accuracy of 96.67%. When determining the level of malignancy in lung tumors, ANN surpassed other methods without built-in feature selection, attaining an average test accuracy of 84.74%. In comparison, HLR exceeded the performance of other methods with built-in feature selection, reaching an average test accuracy of 93.33%.ConclusionsThe experimental results indicated that HLR with built-in feature selection and ANN without built-in feature selection exhibited strong competitiveness among the methods investigated in both classifying benign and malignant lung tissue and assessing the degree of aggressiveness in lung cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信