Budd-Chiari综合征血流动力学和再狭窄风险评估:CFD研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Shikun Zhang, Zhen Wang, Wenyue Sun, Qingrong Zhou, Hui Tang, Junbin Xu, Peijun Qi, Yinghong Zhao, Fei Wang, Chao Chen
{"title":"Budd-Chiari综合征血流动力学和再狭窄风险评估:CFD研究。","authors":"Shikun Zhang, Zhen Wang, Wenyue Sun, Qingrong Zhou, Hui Tang, Junbin Xu, Peijun Qi, Yinghong Zhao, Fei Wang, Chao Chen","doi":"10.1177/09287329251360084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and ObjectiveBudd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) presents challenges in postoperative restenosis risk prediction due to unclear hemodynamic pathophysiology. Despite advances in interventional therapies, tools linking hemodynamic abnormalities to vascular remodeling are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate hemodynamic changes in BCS patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis using patient-specific MRI and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to establish predictive biomarkers and optimize management.Methods3D IVC models were reconstructed from preoperative, postoperative, and healthy control MRI data. Dynamic hemodynamic parameters, including flow velocity, pressure gradients, wall shear stress (WSS), and vortex patterns, were analyzed via CFD simulations under physiologically accurate boundary conditions.ResultsPreoperative IVC stenosis caused severe disturbances. Post-intervention, parameters decreased (e.g., peak stenotic velocity from 1.91 m/s to 0.97 m/s; trans-stenotic pressure gradient from 3562 Pa to 1404 Pa) but remained higher than normal (peak velocity: 0.27 m/s; pressure fluctuation: Δ1225 Pa). Persistent vortices near stent edges and incomplete pressure normalization were observed, correlating with restenosis incidence. These findings highlight unresolved WSS (post-op peak WSS: 18.2 Pa vs normal: 6.18 Pa) and abnormal flow dynamics (e.g., prolonged vortex duration) as key recurrence risks.ConclusionThis study provides a hemodynamic framework for BCS, showing that intervention alleviates stenosis but doesn't restore normal flow. Residual stress emphasizes the need for adjunct therapies. The CFD approach offers predictive insights, advocating personalized monitoring for improved BCS outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329251360084"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemodynamics and restenosis risk assessment in Budd-Chiari syndrome: A CFD study.\",\"authors\":\"Shikun Zhang, Zhen Wang, Wenyue Sun, Qingrong Zhou, Hui Tang, Junbin Xu, Peijun Qi, Yinghong Zhao, Fei Wang, Chao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09287329251360084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background and ObjectiveBudd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) presents challenges in postoperative restenosis risk prediction due to unclear hemodynamic pathophysiology. Despite advances in interventional therapies, tools linking hemodynamic abnormalities to vascular remodeling are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate hemodynamic changes in BCS patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis using patient-specific MRI and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to establish predictive biomarkers and optimize management.Methods3D IVC models were reconstructed from preoperative, postoperative, and healthy control MRI data. Dynamic hemodynamic parameters, including flow velocity, pressure gradients, wall shear stress (WSS), and vortex patterns, were analyzed via CFD simulations under physiologically accurate boundary conditions.ResultsPreoperative IVC stenosis caused severe disturbances. Post-intervention, parameters decreased (e.g., peak stenotic velocity from 1.91 m/s to 0.97 m/s; trans-stenotic pressure gradient from 3562 Pa to 1404 Pa) but remained higher than normal (peak velocity: 0.27 m/s; pressure fluctuation: Δ1225 Pa). Persistent vortices near stent edges and incomplete pressure normalization were observed, correlating with restenosis incidence. These findings highlight unresolved WSS (post-op peak WSS: 18.2 Pa vs normal: 6.18 Pa) and abnormal flow dynamics (e.g., prolonged vortex duration) as key recurrence risks.ConclusionThis study provides a hemodynamic framework for BCS, showing that intervention alleviates stenosis but doesn't restore normal flow. Residual stress emphasizes the need for adjunct therapies. The CFD approach offers predictive insights, advocating personalized monitoring for improved BCS outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9287329251360084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251360084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251360084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的budd - chiari综合征(BCS)由于血流动力学病理生理不明确,给术后再狭窄风险预测带来了挑战。尽管介入治疗取得了进展,但缺乏将血液动力学异常与血管重构联系起来的工具。本研究旨在通过患者特异性MRI和计算流体动力学(CFD)评估BCS合并下腔静脉(IVC)狭窄患者的血流动力学变化,以建立预测性生物标志物并优化管理。方法利用术前、术后及健康对照MRI数据重建三维下腔静脉模型。在生理精确的边界条件下,通过CFD模拟分析了动态血流动力学参数,包括流速、压力梯度、壁面剪切应力(WSS)和涡型。结果术前下腔静脉狭窄引起严重的心功能障碍。干预后,参数降低(例如,峰值狭窄速度从1.91 m/s降至0.97 m/s;从3562 Pa到1404 Pa),但仍高于正常水平(峰值流速:0.27 m/s;压力波动:Δ1225 Pa)。在支架边缘附近观察到持续的漩涡和不完全的压力正常化,这与再狭窄的发生率相关。这些发现强调了未解决的WSS(术后峰值WSS: 18.2 Pa,正常:6.18 Pa)和异常的流动动力学(例如,漩涡持续时间延长)是关键的复发风险。结论本研究为BCS提供了血流动力学框架,表明干预缓解了狭窄,但没有恢复正常血流。残余应力强调需要辅助治疗。CFD方法提供了预测性见解,倡导个性化监测,以改善BCS结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hemodynamics and restenosis risk assessment in Budd-Chiari syndrome: A CFD study.

Background and ObjectiveBudd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) presents challenges in postoperative restenosis risk prediction due to unclear hemodynamic pathophysiology. Despite advances in interventional therapies, tools linking hemodynamic abnormalities to vascular remodeling are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate hemodynamic changes in BCS patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis using patient-specific MRI and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to establish predictive biomarkers and optimize management.Methods3D IVC models were reconstructed from preoperative, postoperative, and healthy control MRI data. Dynamic hemodynamic parameters, including flow velocity, pressure gradients, wall shear stress (WSS), and vortex patterns, were analyzed via CFD simulations under physiologically accurate boundary conditions.ResultsPreoperative IVC stenosis caused severe disturbances. Post-intervention, parameters decreased (e.g., peak stenotic velocity from 1.91 m/s to 0.97 m/s; trans-stenotic pressure gradient from 3562 Pa to 1404 Pa) but remained higher than normal (peak velocity: 0.27 m/s; pressure fluctuation: Δ1225 Pa). Persistent vortices near stent edges and incomplete pressure normalization were observed, correlating with restenosis incidence. These findings highlight unresolved WSS (post-op peak WSS: 18.2 Pa vs normal: 6.18 Pa) and abnormal flow dynamics (e.g., prolonged vortex duration) as key recurrence risks.ConclusionThis study provides a hemodynamic framework for BCS, showing that intervention alleviates stenosis but doesn't restore normal flow. Residual stress emphasizes the need for adjunct therapies. The CFD approach offers predictive insights, advocating personalized monitoring for improved BCS outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信