GnRH激动剂在子宫腺肌症女性胚胎移植前的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mireia González-Comadran, Esteban Alwane Olmos, Mauricio Alexis Agüero Mariño, Miguel Angel Checa Vizcaíno
{"title":"GnRH激动剂在子宫腺肌症女性胚胎移植前的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mireia González-Comadran, Esteban Alwane Olmos, Mauricio Alexis Agüero Mariño, Miguel Angel Checa Vizcaíno","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20250012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the benefit of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) in reproductive outcomes among women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF. The utility of GnRHa protocols for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and fresh embryo transfer, and the pretreatment with GnRHa before frozen-thawed embryo transfer were evaluated. The search spanned studies published in MEDLINE and Embase databases up to April 2024. Eight retrospective studies were included. The use of long GnRHa and antagonist protocol before COS exhibited significantly higher implantation rate compared to ultra-long GnRHa (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.69-1.77 and OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.04-3.75, respectively), although no significant differences were observed in clinical and live birth rates. However, antagonist compared to long GnRHa protocol before COS improved live birth rate (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.03-6.52). Pretreatment with GnRHa before FET among women with adenomyosis did not improve reproductive outcomes. In conclusion, there is no evidence regarding benefit of long or ultra-long GnRHa protocol before COS or before FET among women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF. In fact, the use of long GnRHa seem to worsen reproductive outcomes compared to antagonist protocols. Prospective trials are needed to assess the potential benefit of GnRHa among women with adenomyosis seeking fertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":"507-519"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of GnRH Agonists before embryo transfer in women with adenomyosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mireia González-Comadran, Esteban Alwane Olmos, Mauricio Alexis Agüero Mariño, Miguel Angel Checa Vizcaíno\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/1518-0557.20250012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the benefit of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) in reproductive outcomes among women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF. The utility of GnRHa protocols for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and fresh embryo transfer, and the pretreatment with GnRHa before frozen-thawed embryo transfer were evaluated. The search spanned studies published in MEDLINE and Embase databases up to April 2024. Eight retrospective studies were included. The use of long GnRHa and antagonist protocol before COS exhibited significantly higher implantation rate compared to ultra-long GnRHa (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.69-1.77 and OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.04-3.75, respectively), although no significant differences were observed in clinical and live birth rates. However, antagonist compared to long GnRHa protocol before COS improved live birth rate (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.03-6.52). Pretreatment with GnRHa before FET among women with adenomyosis did not improve reproductive outcomes. In conclusion, there is no evidence regarding benefit of long or ultra-long GnRHa protocol before COS or before FET among women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF. In fact, the use of long GnRHa seem to worsen reproductive outcomes compared to antagonist protocols. Prospective trials are needed to assess the potential benefit of GnRHa among women with adenomyosis seeking fertility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"507-519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469277/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估GnRH激动剂(GnRHa)对接受体外受精的bbb妇女生殖结局的益处。评价了GnRHa在控制卵巢刺激(COS)和新鲜胚胎移植中的应用,以及冻融胚胎移植前GnRHa的预处理。该搜索涵盖了截至2024年4月在MEDLINE和Embase数据库中发表的研究。纳入8项回顾性研究。与超长GnRHa相比,COS前使用长GnRHa和拮抗剂方案的着床率显着高于超长GnRHa (OR分别为1.1,95% CI 0.69-1.77和1.98,95% CI 1.04-3.75),尽管在临床和活产率方面没有观察到显着差异。然而,与COS前的长GnRHa方案相比,拮抗剂提高了活产率(OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.03-6.52)。子宫腺肌症妇女在FET前使用GnRHa预处理并没有改善生殖结局。总之,没有证据表明长或超长GnRHa方案对接受体外受精的子宫腺肌症妇女在COS前或FET前有好处。事实上,与拮抗剂方案相比,使用长GnRHa似乎会使生殖结果恶化。需要前瞻性试验来评估GnRHa对寻求生育能力的子宫腺肌症妇女的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of GnRH Agonists before embryo transfer in women with adenomyosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the benefit of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) in reproductive outcomes among women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF. The utility of GnRHa protocols for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and fresh embryo transfer, and the pretreatment with GnRHa before frozen-thawed embryo transfer were evaluated. The search spanned studies published in MEDLINE and Embase databases up to April 2024. Eight retrospective studies were included. The use of long GnRHa and antagonist protocol before COS exhibited significantly higher implantation rate compared to ultra-long GnRHa (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.69-1.77 and OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.04-3.75, respectively), although no significant differences were observed in clinical and live birth rates. However, antagonist compared to long GnRHa protocol before COS improved live birth rate (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.03-6.52). Pretreatment with GnRHa before FET among women with adenomyosis did not improve reproductive outcomes. In conclusion, there is no evidence regarding benefit of long or ultra-long GnRHa protocol before COS or before FET among women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF. In fact, the use of long GnRHa seem to worsen reproductive outcomes compared to antagonist protocols. Prospective trials are needed to assess the potential benefit of GnRHa among women with adenomyosis seeking fertility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信