生育医生对供体精子治疗的方法:一项全球调查。

IF 1.9 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ettie Maman, Ariel Weissman, Gon Shoham, Jordana Hyman, Yossi Mizrachi, Avi Tsafrir
{"title":"生育医生对供体精子治疗的方法:一项全球调查。","authors":"Ettie Maman, Ariel Weissman, Gon Shoham, Jordana Hyman, Yossi Mizrachi, Avi Tsafrir","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20250017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many women presenting for treatment with donor sperm have never attempted conception, and are therefore presumed fertile. With no clear guidelines, treatment can be influenced by factors like patient age and costs. We aimed to explore fertility physicians' attitudes and clinical practices regarding donor sperm treatments through a global survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an anonymous international web-based survey of fertility clinicians. The survey addressed various aspects of donor sperm treatment in women without previous infertility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 211 clinicians participated, with 63% working in private settings. The survey presented clinical scenarios for women aged 32, 37, and 40. Most clinicians (80%) recommended artificial insemination with donor sperm in a natural cycle (NC-AID) as the first-line treatment for a 32-year-old woman (52% suggested up to 3 cycles, 28% up to 6 cycles). This approach was favored by 45% for a 37-year-old and 25% for a 40-year-old. Variability was noted regarding the second-line treatment for a 32-year-old after one failed NC-AID varied (equal recommendations for ovarian stimulation with oral agents, gonadotropins, or IVF). For older women, active management was preferred: 24% recommended gonadotropins and 15% IVF for 37-year-olds, and 16% gonadotropins and 55% IVF for 40-year-olds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey highlights the controversy surrounding the optimal approach for women with no history of infertility seeking to conceive with donor sperm. Our findings emphasize the need for further research and the development of comprehensive guidelines in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":"467-472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Approach of Fertility Physicians to Donor Sperm Treatments: A Worldwide Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Ettie Maman, Ariel Weissman, Gon Shoham, Jordana Hyman, Yossi Mizrachi, Avi Tsafrir\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/1518-0557.20250017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many women presenting for treatment with donor sperm have never attempted conception, and are therefore presumed fertile. With no clear guidelines, treatment can be influenced by factors like patient age and costs. We aimed to explore fertility physicians' attitudes and clinical practices regarding donor sperm treatments through a global survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an anonymous international web-based survey of fertility clinicians. The survey addressed various aspects of donor sperm treatment in women without previous infertility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 211 clinicians participated, with 63% working in private settings. The survey presented clinical scenarios for women aged 32, 37, and 40. Most clinicians (80%) recommended artificial insemination with donor sperm in a natural cycle (NC-AID) as the first-line treatment for a 32-year-old woman (52% suggested up to 3 cycles, 28% up to 6 cycles). This approach was favored by 45% for a 37-year-old and 25% for a 40-year-old. Variability was noted regarding the second-line treatment for a 32-year-old after one failed NC-AID varied (equal recommendations for ovarian stimulation with oral agents, gonadotropins, or IVF). For older women, active management was preferred: 24% recommended gonadotropins and 15% IVF for 37-year-olds, and 16% gonadotropins and 55% IVF for 40-year-olds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey highlights the controversy surrounding the optimal approach for women with no history of infertility seeking to conceive with donor sperm. Our findings emphasize the need for further research and the development of comprehensive guidelines in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"467-472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469122/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:许多接受供体精子治疗的妇女从未尝试过受孕,因此被认为有生育能力。由于没有明确的指导方针,治疗可能会受到患者年龄和费用等因素的影响。我们旨在通过一项全球调查来探讨生育医生对供体精子治疗的态度和临床实践。方法:我们对生育临床医生进行了一项匿名的国际网络调查。这项调查涉及了以前没有不孕的妇女的供体精子治疗的各个方面。结果:共有211名临床医生参与,其中63%在私人机构工作。调查显示了32岁、37岁和40岁女性的临床情况。大多数临床医生(80%)建议用自然周期的供体精子人工授精(NC-AID)作为32岁女性的一线治疗(52%建议最多3个周期,28%建议最多6个周期)。37岁和40岁的受访者中分别有45%和25%的人支持这种方法。对于一名32岁的患者,在一次NC-AID失败后,二线治疗的差异值得注意(口服药物、促性腺激素或体外受精刺激卵巢的建议相同)。对于年龄较大的女性,首选积极管理:37岁的24%推荐使用促性腺激素和15%的试管婴儿,40岁的16%推荐使用促性腺激素和55%的试管婴儿。结论:这项调查突出了围绕无不育史的妇女寻求用供体精子怀孕的最佳方法的争议。我们的研究结果强调了在这一领域进一步研究和制定综合指南的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Approach of Fertility Physicians to Donor Sperm Treatments: A Worldwide Survey.

Objective: Many women presenting for treatment with donor sperm have never attempted conception, and are therefore presumed fertile. With no clear guidelines, treatment can be influenced by factors like patient age and costs. We aimed to explore fertility physicians' attitudes and clinical practices regarding donor sperm treatments through a global survey.

Methods: We conducted an anonymous international web-based survey of fertility clinicians. The survey addressed various aspects of donor sperm treatment in women without previous infertility.

Results: A total of 211 clinicians participated, with 63% working in private settings. The survey presented clinical scenarios for women aged 32, 37, and 40. Most clinicians (80%) recommended artificial insemination with donor sperm in a natural cycle (NC-AID) as the first-line treatment for a 32-year-old woman (52% suggested up to 3 cycles, 28% up to 6 cycles). This approach was favored by 45% for a 37-year-old and 25% for a 40-year-old. Variability was noted regarding the second-line treatment for a 32-year-old after one failed NC-AID varied (equal recommendations for ovarian stimulation with oral agents, gonadotropins, or IVF). For older women, active management was preferred: 24% recommended gonadotropins and 15% IVF for 37-year-olds, and 16% gonadotropins and 55% IVF for 40-year-olds.

Conclusions: This survey highlights the controversy surrounding the optimal approach for women with no history of infertility seeking to conceive with donor sperm. Our findings emphasize the need for further research and the development of comprehensive guidelines in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信