植物乳杆菌和上清:与氟孕酮或醋酸甲孕酮同步的母羊阴道健康和生殖参数。

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Baris Guner, Tevhide Elif Guner
{"title":"植物乳杆菌和上清:与氟孕酮或醋酸甲孕酮同步的母羊阴道健康和生殖参数。","authors":"Baris Guner, Tevhide Elif Guner","doi":"10.1007/s11250-025-04550-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum (LAC) and its cell-free supernatant (CFS) on vaginal health and reproductive performance in ewes. The ewes were synchronized using fluorogestone acetate (FGA) or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) impregnated intravaginal sponges. A total of 196 Merino ewes were randomly assigned to four groups in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Intravaginal sponges remained for 14 days, and vaginal discharge, sponge weight change, estrus response, and pregnancy rates were evaluated. No adverse health effects were observed following intravaginal probiotic treatment. There was a tendency (p = 0.07) for higher sponge loss in the FGA group (13.2%) compared to the MPA group (5.7%). On the day of sponge removal, 90.8% of ewes exhibited vaginal discharge. Although not statistically significant, mean vaginal discharge scores were lower in LAC-treated groups compared to CFS-treated groups. While L. plantarum had no significant effect on vaginal discharge scores in the MPA group (40.7% in MPA + LAC vs. 41.7% in MPA + CFS for score 2; p > 0.05), it significantly reduced purulent/hemorrhagic discharge in the FGA group (29.7% in FGA + LAC vs. 47.6% in FGA + CFS; p < 0.05). Estrus initiation occurred significantly earlier in the FGA group (36.8 ± 1.9 h) compared to the MPA group (49.1 ± 1.2 h; p < 0.01), although neither the probiotic treatment nor its interaction with progestagen type significantly influenced estrus timing. Pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the FGA + LAC (71.7%) and FGA + CFS (75.6%) groups compared to the MPA + LAC (49.0%) and MPA + CFS (50.0%) groups (p < 0.01). Our findings suggest that FGA-based synchronization improves pregnancy rates, while treatment with L. plantarum may enhance vaginal health, providing a potential non-antibiotic approach for reproductive management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23329,"journal":{"name":"Tropical animal health and production","volume":"57 7","pages":"307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lactobacillus plantarum and supernatant: vaginal health and reproductive parameters of ewes synchronized with fluorogestone or medroxyprogesterone acetate.\",\"authors\":\"Baris Guner, Tevhide Elif Guner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11250-025-04550-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum (LAC) and its cell-free supernatant (CFS) on vaginal health and reproductive performance in ewes. The ewes were synchronized using fluorogestone acetate (FGA) or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) impregnated intravaginal sponges. A total of 196 Merino ewes were randomly assigned to four groups in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Intravaginal sponges remained for 14 days, and vaginal discharge, sponge weight change, estrus response, and pregnancy rates were evaluated. No adverse health effects were observed following intravaginal probiotic treatment. There was a tendency (p = 0.07) for higher sponge loss in the FGA group (13.2%) compared to the MPA group (5.7%). On the day of sponge removal, 90.8% of ewes exhibited vaginal discharge. Although not statistically significant, mean vaginal discharge scores were lower in LAC-treated groups compared to CFS-treated groups. While L. plantarum had no significant effect on vaginal discharge scores in the MPA group (40.7% in MPA + LAC vs. 41.7% in MPA + CFS for score 2; p > 0.05), it significantly reduced purulent/hemorrhagic discharge in the FGA group (29.7% in FGA + LAC vs. 47.6% in FGA + CFS; p < 0.05). Estrus initiation occurred significantly earlier in the FGA group (36.8 ± 1.9 h) compared to the MPA group (49.1 ± 1.2 h; p < 0.01), although neither the probiotic treatment nor its interaction with progestagen type significantly influenced estrus timing. Pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the FGA + LAC (71.7%) and FGA + CFS (75.6%) groups compared to the MPA + LAC (49.0%) and MPA + CFS (50.0%) groups (p < 0.01). Our findings suggest that FGA-based synchronization improves pregnancy rates, while treatment with L. plantarum may enhance vaginal health, providing a potential non-antibiotic approach for reproductive management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical animal health and production\",\"volume\":\"57 7\",\"pages\":\"307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical animal health and production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04550-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical animal health and production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04550-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本试验研究了植物乳杆菌(LAC)及其无细胞上清(CFS)对母羊阴道健康和生殖性能的影响。用醋酸氟孕酮(FGA)或醋酸甲孕酮(MPA)浸渍阴道内海绵对母羊进行同步。采用2 × 2因子设计,将196只美利奴母羊随机分为4组。阴道内海绵放置14天,评估阴道分泌物、海绵重量变化、发情反应和妊娠率。阴道内益生菌治疗后未观察到不良健康影响。与MPA组(5.7%)相比,FGA组(13.2%)海绵损失有更高的趋势(p = 0.07)。在去除海绵当天,90.8%的母羊出现阴道分泌物。虽然没有统计学意义,但与cfs治疗组相比,lac治疗组的平均阴道分泌物评分较低。而植物乳草菌对MPA组阴道分泌物评分无显著影响(MPA + LAC组为40.7%,MPA + CFS组为41.7%;p > 0.05), FGA组脓性/出血性排出明显减少(FGA + LAC组为29.7%,FGA + CFS组为47.6%;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lactobacillus plantarum and supernatant: vaginal health and reproductive parameters of ewes synchronized with fluorogestone or medroxyprogesterone acetate.

This study investigated the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum (LAC) and its cell-free supernatant (CFS) on vaginal health and reproductive performance in ewes. The ewes were synchronized using fluorogestone acetate (FGA) or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) impregnated intravaginal sponges. A total of 196 Merino ewes were randomly assigned to four groups in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Intravaginal sponges remained for 14 days, and vaginal discharge, sponge weight change, estrus response, and pregnancy rates were evaluated. No adverse health effects were observed following intravaginal probiotic treatment. There was a tendency (p = 0.07) for higher sponge loss in the FGA group (13.2%) compared to the MPA group (5.7%). On the day of sponge removal, 90.8% of ewes exhibited vaginal discharge. Although not statistically significant, mean vaginal discharge scores were lower in LAC-treated groups compared to CFS-treated groups. While L. plantarum had no significant effect on vaginal discharge scores in the MPA group (40.7% in MPA + LAC vs. 41.7% in MPA + CFS for score 2; p > 0.05), it significantly reduced purulent/hemorrhagic discharge in the FGA group (29.7% in FGA + LAC vs. 47.6% in FGA + CFS; p < 0.05). Estrus initiation occurred significantly earlier in the FGA group (36.8 ± 1.9 h) compared to the MPA group (49.1 ± 1.2 h; p < 0.01), although neither the probiotic treatment nor its interaction with progestagen type significantly influenced estrus timing. Pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the FGA + LAC (71.7%) and FGA + CFS (75.6%) groups compared to the MPA + LAC (49.0%) and MPA + CFS (50.0%) groups (p < 0.01). Our findings suggest that FGA-based synchronization improves pregnancy rates, while treatment with L. plantarum may enhance vaginal health, providing a potential non-antibiotic approach for reproductive management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical animal health and production
Tropical animal health and production 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Animal Health and Production is an international journal publishing the results of original research in any field of animal health, welfare, and production with the aim of improving health and productivity of livestock, and better utilisation of animal resources, including wildlife in tropical, subtropical and similar agro-ecological environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信