一个截然不同的世界?19世纪中期阿姆斯特丹婴儿死亡原因中的社会不平等。

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY
Social History of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1093/shm/hkae066
Sanne Muurling, Peter Ekamper
{"title":"一个截然不同的世界?19世纪中期阿姆斯特丹婴儿死亡原因中的社会不平等。","authors":"Sanne Muurling, Peter Ekamper","doi":"10.1093/shm/hkae066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between mortality and socioeconomic status is among the most debated topics within historical demography. This article scrutinises social disparities in infant mortality and its underlying mechanisms in mid-nineteenth-century Amsterdam. We apply two methods of survival analysis (Cox proportional hazard models and Fine-Grey competing risk models) on newly digitised individual-level cause-of-death data for infants born in 1856 combined with civil certificates and population register data. Through a comparison of all-cause and cause-specific mortality, we bring to light important social differences in infants' mortality risks; hazard ratios for congenital and birth disorders during early post-neonatal infancy were over 50 per cent lower for Amsterdam's middle class than for unskilled workers. We argue that the social differentiation in infant mortality reflects stark intra-urban disparities in maternal health across social groups as well as a degree of medical ineffectiveness or even indifference structured along the same socioeconomic lines.</p>","PeriodicalId":21922,"journal":{"name":"Social History of Medicine","volume":"38 2","pages":"291-322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A World of (In)difference? Social Inequalities Among Infants' Causes of Death in Mid-nineteenth-Century Amsterdam.\",\"authors\":\"Sanne Muurling, Peter Ekamper\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/shm/hkae066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The relationship between mortality and socioeconomic status is among the most debated topics within historical demography. This article scrutinises social disparities in infant mortality and its underlying mechanisms in mid-nineteenth-century Amsterdam. We apply two methods of survival analysis (Cox proportional hazard models and Fine-Grey competing risk models) on newly digitised individual-level cause-of-death data for infants born in 1856 combined with civil certificates and population register data. Through a comparison of all-cause and cause-specific mortality, we bring to light important social differences in infants' mortality risks; hazard ratios for congenital and birth disorders during early post-neonatal infancy were over 50 per cent lower for Amsterdam's middle class than for unskilled workers. We argue that the social differentiation in infant mortality reflects stark intra-urban disparities in maternal health across social groups as well as a degree of medical ineffectiveness or even indifference structured along the same socioeconomic lines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social History of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"291-322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264207/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social History of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkae066\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkae066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

死亡率和社会经济地位之间的关系是历史人口学中最具争议的话题之一。本文详细分析了19世纪中期阿姆斯特丹婴儿死亡率的社会差异及其潜在机制。我们将两种生存分析方法(Cox比例风险模型和Fine-Grey竞争风险模型)应用于1856年出生的婴儿的新数字化个人死因数据,并结合民事证明和人口登记数据。通过对全因死亡率和特定原因死亡率的比较,我们揭示了婴儿死亡风险的重要社会差异;阿姆斯特丹的中产阶级在新生儿后期早期患先天性和出生障碍的风险比非技术工人低50%以上。我们认为,婴儿死亡率的社会差异反映了不同社会群体在孕产妇健康方面的明显城市内差异,以及一定程度的医疗无效甚至是沿着相同的社会经济线构建的冷漠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A World of (In)difference? Social Inequalities Among Infants' Causes of Death in Mid-nineteenth-Century Amsterdam.

The relationship between mortality and socioeconomic status is among the most debated topics within historical demography. This article scrutinises social disparities in infant mortality and its underlying mechanisms in mid-nineteenth-century Amsterdam. We apply two methods of survival analysis (Cox proportional hazard models and Fine-Grey competing risk models) on newly digitised individual-level cause-of-death data for infants born in 1856 combined with civil certificates and population register data. Through a comparison of all-cause and cause-specific mortality, we bring to light important social differences in infants' mortality risks; hazard ratios for congenital and birth disorders during early post-neonatal infancy were over 50 per cent lower for Amsterdam's middle class than for unskilled workers. We argue that the social differentiation in infant mortality reflects stark intra-urban disparities in maternal health across social groups as well as a degree of medical ineffectiveness or even indifference structured along the same socioeconomic lines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social History of Medicine
Social History of Medicine 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social History of Medicine , the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine, is concerned with all aspects of health, illness, and medical treatment in the past. It is committed to publishing work on the social history of medicine from a variety of disciplines. The journal offers its readers substantive and lively articles on a variety of themes, critical assessments of archives and sources, conference reports, up-to-date information on research in progress, a discussion point on topics of current controversy and concern, review articles, and wide-ranging book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信