来曲唑排卵方案用于多囊卵巢综合征妇女冷冻解冻胚胎移植:一项多中心随机对照试验

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Yanqiu Xie, Ping Li, Guimin Hao, Weifen Deng, Junli Zhao, Shanshan Gao, Bingbing Deng, Yanping Li, Min Deng, Yingying Yuan, Qi Fan, Ningzhen Zhang, Zhiming Zhao, Yuhua Shi
{"title":"来曲唑排卵方案用于多囊卵巢综合征妇女冷冻解冻胚胎移植:一项多中心随机对照试验","authors":"Yanqiu Xie, Ping Li, Guimin Hao, Weifen Deng, Junli Zhao, Shanshan Gao, Bingbing Deng, Yanping Li, Min Deng, Yingying Yuan, Qi Fan, Ningzhen Zhang, Zhiming Zhao, Yuhua Shi","doi":"10.1186/s12958-025-01432-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients typically undergo either an ovulation induction regimen or a programmed regimen for endometrial preparation before frozen embryo transfer (FET). However, the superiority of one approach over the other remains controversial. While previous studies suggest that the letrozole regimen may improve pregnancy outcomes, prospective studies are insufficient. Therefore, we designed a multi-center randomized controlled trial to compare the pregnancy outcomes between these two regimens in PCOS patients undergoing FET.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, randomised controlled, open-label trial included 155 PCOS patients from six hospitals in China between September 2022 and February 2024. Patients were randomised into either the letrozole ovulation regimen group (n = 81) or the programmed regimen group (n = 74) during FET cycles. Subgroup analysis was used among patients with single blastocyst transfer. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate, with secondary outcomes including abortion rate, live birth rate, and other pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 155 FET women showed no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates between the letrozole group (62.96%) and the programmed group (60.81%, P > 0.05). Similarly, no differences were observed in abortion rate, live birth rate, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm birth, or neonatal birth weight. However, more patients in the letrozole group received single-drug luteal support (53.16% vs. 16.67%, P < 0.05). A subgroup analysis of 108 women involving patients who underwent single blastocyst transfer revealed no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rates (66.67% vs. 73.33%, P > 0.05) or live birth rates (58.73% vs. 55.56%, P > 0.05) between the two groups. A higher proportion of women in the letrozole ovulation regimen group received single-drug luteal support compared to those in the programmed regimen group (58.73% vs. 22.22%, P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of fertilization method, abortion rate, or obstetric and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The letrozole ovulation regimen demonstrated comparable clinical pregnancy rates to the programmed regimen in PCOS patients undergoing FET, while requiring only simple luteal support. These findings suggest that the letrozole regimen may be a favourable alternative for endometrial preparation in this population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200062244 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn ). Registered on 31 July 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":21011,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","volume":"23 1","pages":"103"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Letrozole ovulation regimen for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a muti-centre randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yanqiu Xie, Ping Li, Guimin Hao, Weifen Deng, Junli Zhao, Shanshan Gao, Bingbing Deng, Yanping Li, Min Deng, Yingying Yuan, Qi Fan, Ningzhen Zhang, Zhiming Zhao, Yuhua Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12958-025-01432-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients typically undergo either an ovulation induction regimen or a programmed regimen for endometrial preparation before frozen embryo transfer (FET). However, the superiority of one approach over the other remains controversial. While previous studies suggest that the letrozole regimen may improve pregnancy outcomes, prospective studies are insufficient. Therefore, we designed a multi-center randomized controlled trial to compare the pregnancy outcomes between these two regimens in PCOS patients undergoing FET.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, randomised controlled, open-label trial included 155 PCOS patients from six hospitals in China between September 2022 and February 2024. Patients were randomised into either the letrozole ovulation regimen group (n = 81) or the programmed regimen group (n = 74) during FET cycles. Subgroup analysis was used among patients with single blastocyst transfer. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate, with secondary outcomes including abortion rate, live birth rate, and other pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 155 FET women showed no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates between the letrozole group (62.96%) and the programmed group (60.81%, P > 0.05). Similarly, no differences were observed in abortion rate, live birth rate, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm birth, or neonatal birth weight. However, more patients in the letrozole group received single-drug luteal support (53.16% vs. 16.67%, P < 0.05). A subgroup analysis of 108 women involving patients who underwent single blastocyst transfer revealed no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rates (66.67% vs. 73.33%, P > 0.05) or live birth rates (58.73% vs. 55.56%, P > 0.05) between the two groups. A higher proportion of women in the letrozole ovulation regimen group received single-drug luteal support compared to those in the programmed regimen group (58.73% vs. 22.22%, P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of fertilization method, abortion rate, or obstetric and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The letrozole ovulation regimen demonstrated comparable clinical pregnancy rates to the programmed regimen in PCOS patients undergoing FET, while requiring only simple luteal support. These findings suggest that the letrozole regimen may be a favourable alternative for endometrial preparation in this population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200062244 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn ). Registered on 31 July 2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269307/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-025-01432-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-025-01432-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者通常在冷冻胚胎移植(FET)前接受促排卵方案或子宫内膜准备方案。然而,一种方法优于另一种方法仍然存在争议。虽然先前的研究表明来曲唑方案可以改善妊娠结局,但前瞻性研究不足。因此,我们设计了一项多中心随机对照试验,比较这两种方案在接受FET治疗的PCOS患者中的妊娠结局。方法:这项多中心、随机对照、开放标签的试验包括来自中国6家医院的155名PCOS患者,时间为2022年9月至2024年2月。在FET周期中,患者被随机分为来曲唑排卵方案组(n = 81)或程序方案组(n = 74)。对单囊胚移植患者进行亚组分析。主要结局为临床妊娠率,次要结局包括流产率、活产率及其他妊娠和新生儿结局。结果:155例FET患者临床妊娠率来曲唑组(62.96%)与计划组(60.81%,P < 0.05)比较差异无统计学意义。同样,在流产率、活产率、妊娠期高血压疾病、妊娠期糖尿病、早产和新生儿出生体重方面也没有观察到差异。而来曲唑组接受单药黄体支持(53.16% vs. 16.67%, P 0.05)或活产率(58.73% vs. 55.56%, P 0.05)高于来曲唑组。来曲唑排卵方案组接受单药黄体支持的女性比例高于程序方案组(58.73% vs. 22.22%)。结论:来曲唑排卵方案在接受FET治疗的PCOS患者的临床妊娠率与程序方案相当,而只需要简单的黄体支持。这些发现表明,来曲唑方案可能是一个有利的替代子宫内膜准备在这一人群。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR2200062244 (https://www.chictr.org.cn)。于2022年7月31日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Letrozole ovulation regimen for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a muti-centre randomised controlled trial.

Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients typically undergo either an ovulation induction regimen or a programmed regimen for endometrial preparation before frozen embryo transfer (FET). However, the superiority of one approach over the other remains controversial. While previous studies suggest that the letrozole regimen may improve pregnancy outcomes, prospective studies are insufficient. Therefore, we designed a multi-center randomized controlled trial to compare the pregnancy outcomes between these two regimens in PCOS patients undergoing FET.

Methods: This multicentre, randomised controlled, open-label trial included 155 PCOS patients from six hospitals in China between September 2022 and February 2024. Patients were randomised into either the letrozole ovulation regimen group (n = 81) or the programmed regimen group (n = 74) during FET cycles. Subgroup analysis was used among patients with single blastocyst transfer. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate, with secondary outcomes including abortion rate, live birth rate, and other pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Results: Analysis of 155 FET women showed no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates between the letrozole group (62.96%) and the programmed group (60.81%, P > 0.05). Similarly, no differences were observed in abortion rate, live birth rate, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm birth, or neonatal birth weight. However, more patients in the letrozole group received single-drug luteal support (53.16% vs. 16.67%, P < 0.05). A subgroup analysis of 108 women involving patients who underwent single blastocyst transfer revealed no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rates (66.67% vs. 73.33%, P > 0.05) or live birth rates (58.73% vs. 55.56%, P > 0.05) between the two groups. A higher proportion of women in the letrozole ovulation regimen group received single-drug luteal support compared to those in the programmed regimen group (58.73% vs. 22.22%, P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of fertilization method, abortion rate, or obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

Conclusions: The letrozole ovulation regimen demonstrated comparable clinical pregnancy rates to the programmed regimen in PCOS patients undergoing FET, while requiring only simple luteal support. These findings suggest that the letrozole regimen may be a favourable alternative for endometrial preparation in this population.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200062244 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn ). Registered on 31 July 2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology publishes and disseminates high-quality results from excellent research in the reproductive sciences. The journal publishes on topics covering gametogenesis, fertilization, early embryonic development, embryo-uterus interaction, reproductive development, pregnancy, uterine biology, endocrinology of reproduction, control of reproduction, reproductive immunology, neuroendocrinology, and veterinary and human reproductive medicine, including all vertebrate species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信