Marlene Fischer, Josephine Küllmei, Linda Krause, Peipei Wei, Ursula Kahl, Elena Kainz, Caspar Mewes, Markus Graefen, Alexander Haese, Christian Zöllner, Lili Plümer
{"title":"根治性前列腺切除术后自我报告的恢复质量——一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Marlene Fischer, Josephine Küllmei, Linda Krause, Peipei Wei, Ursula Kahl, Elena Kainz, Caspar Mewes, Markus Graefen, Alexander Haese, Christian Zöllner, Lili Plümer","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04026-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15) has been developed to assess patient-reported recovery 24 h after non-cardiac surgery. This prospective cohort study sought to analyze patient-reported recovery throughout day five after open radical retropubic prostatectomy (ORP) and robot-assisted radical retropubic prostatectomy (RARP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June 2022 and February 2023 adult patients, who were scheduled for elective radical prostatectomy, completed the German version of the QoR-15 (QoR-15GE) preoperatively to establish a baseline value. Between postoperative day one and day five, patients completed the QoR-15GE daily until the day of discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 523 patients completed the questionnaires. On postoperative day one QoR-15GE scores were significantly lower after RARP compared with ORP (ORP: 113 ± 22 vs. RARP: 107 ± 24; p = 0.006) with a higher decline in postoperative QoR-15GE scores in RARP compared with ORP patients (ORP: 27 ± 20 vs. RARP: 32 ± 23; p = 0.006). The multivariable analysis confirmed an influence of surgical technique (Estimate: 4.39; 95% CI [0.27; 8.50], p = 0.037) on postoperative quality of recovery after adjusting for clinically relevant variables. Irrespective of surgical technique, we observed a consistent increase in QoR-15GE scores with similar recovery scores on postoperative days three, four, and five.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who undergo RARP experience poorer postoperative recovery at postoperative days one and two compared to those undergoing ORP. However, recovery scores align from postoperative day three, indicating a similar level of patient-reported recovery before hospital discharge. These findings suggest that the QoR-15GE may be appropriate for serial assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-reported quality of recovery after radical prostatectomy-a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Marlene Fischer, Josephine Küllmei, Linda Krause, Peipei Wei, Ursula Kahl, Elena Kainz, Caspar Mewes, Markus Graefen, Alexander Haese, Christian Zöllner, Lili Plümer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11136-025-04026-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15) has been developed to assess patient-reported recovery 24 h after non-cardiac surgery. This prospective cohort study sought to analyze patient-reported recovery throughout day five after open radical retropubic prostatectomy (ORP) and robot-assisted radical retropubic prostatectomy (RARP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June 2022 and February 2023 adult patients, who were scheduled for elective radical prostatectomy, completed the German version of the QoR-15 (QoR-15GE) preoperatively to establish a baseline value. Between postoperative day one and day five, patients completed the QoR-15GE daily until the day of discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 523 patients completed the questionnaires. On postoperative day one QoR-15GE scores were significantly lower after RARP compared with ORP (ORP: 113 ± 22 vs. RARP: 107 ± 24; p = 0.006) with a higher decline in postoperative QoR-15GE scores in RARP compared with ORP patients (ORP: 27 ± 20 vs. RARP: 32 ± 23; p = 0.006). The multivariable analysis confirmed an influence of surgical technique (Estimate: 4.39; 95% CI [0.27; 8.50], p = 0.037) on postoperative quality of recovery after adjusting for clinically relevant variables. Irrespective of surgical technique, we observed a consistent increase in QoR-15GE scores with similar recovery scores on postoperative days three, four, and five.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who undergo RARP experience poorer postoperative recovery at postoperative days one and two compared to those undergoing ORP. However, recovery scores align from postoperative day three, indicating a similar level of patient-reported recovery before hospital discharge. These findings suggest that the QoR-15GE may be appropriate for serial assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04026-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04026-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:制定了恢复质量-15问卷(QoR-15),以评估非心脏手术后24小时患者报告的恢复情况。这项前瞻性队列研究旨在分析开放性根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术(ORP)和机器人辅助根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术(RARP)后第5天患者报告的恢复情况。方法:在2022年6月至2023年2月期间,计划进行选择性根治性前列腺切除术的成年患者术前完成德国版QoR-15 (QoR-15GE)以建立基线值。术后第1天至第5天,患者每天完成QoR-15GE直至出院。结果:共523例患者完成问卷调查。术后第一天,RARP组QoR-15GE评分明显低于ORP组(ORP: 113±22 vs. RARP: 107±24;p = 0.006),与ORP患者相比,RARP患者术后QoR-15GE评分下降更高(ORP: 27±20 vs RARP: 32±23;p = 0.006)。多变量分析证实了手术技术的影响(估计值:4.39;95% ci [0.27;8.50], p = 0.037)对术后恢复质量的影响。无论手术技术如何,我们观察到QoR-15GE评分在术后第3、4和5天持续增加,恢复评分相似。结论:与ORP相比,RARP患者术后1天和2天的术后恢复较差。然而,术后第三天的恢复评分一致,表明出院前患者报告的恢复水平相似。这些发现表明QoR-15GE可能适用于系列评估。
Self-reported quality of recovery after radical prostatectomy-a prospective cohort study.
Purpose: The Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15) has been developed to assess patient-reported recovery 24 h after non-cardiac surgery. This prospective cohort study sought to analyze patient-reported recovery throughout day five after open radical retropubic prostatectomy (ORP) and robot-assisted radical retropubic prostatectomy (RARP).
Methods: Between June 2022 and February 2023 adult patients, who were scheduled for elective radical prostatectomy, completed the German version of the QoR-15 (QoR-15GE) preoperatively to establish a baseline value. Between postoperative day one and day five, patients completed the QoR-15GE daily until the day of discharge.
Results: A total of 523 patients completed the questionnaires. On postoperative day one QoR-15GE scores were significantly lower after RARP compared with ORP (ORP: 113 ± 22 vs. RARP: 107 ± 24; p = 0.006) with a higher decline in postoperative QoR-15GE scores in RARP compared with ORP patients (ORP: 27 ± 20 vs. RARP: 32 ± 23; p = 0.006). The multivariable analysis confirmed an influence of surgical technique (Estimate: 4.39; 95% CI [0.27; 8.50], p = 0.037) on postoperative quality of recovery after adjusting for clinically relevant variables. Irrespective of surgical technique, we observed a consistent increase in QoR-15GE scores with similar recovery scores on postoperative days three, four, and five.
Conclusion: Patients who undergo RARP experience poorer postoperative recovery at postoperative days one and two compared to those undergoing ORP. However, recovery scores align from postoperative day three, indicating a similar level of patient-reported recovery before hospital discharge. These findings suggest that the QoR-15GE may be appropriate for serial assessments.
期刊介绍:
Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences.
Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership.
This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.