{"title":"[支气管镜肺减容时代的肺减容手术:适应症和策略的重新评估]。","authors":"Shin Tanaka, Yasuaki Tomioka, Haruchika Yamamoto, Hidejiro Torigoe, Kazuhiko Shien, Ken Suzawa, Kentaroh Miyoshi, Mikio Okazaki, Seiichiro Sugimoto, Shinichi Toyooka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction( BLVR) and lung volume reduction surgery( LVRS) represent two complementary strategies in the management of advanced emphysema. BLVR has emerged as a minimally invasive and reversible approach, demonstrating significant clinical benefit in carefully selected patients without collateral ventilation, supported by advances in physiological assessment and imaging technologies. LVRS, by contrast, remains a well-validated surgical option offering sustained improvements in pulmonary mechanics, exercise tolerance, and quality of life, particularly in patients with heterogeneous upper-lobe predominant disease. Recent randomized trials have underscored the comparable efficacy of both modalities, highlighting the need for individualized, phenotype-driven treatment planning. A multidisciplinary, individualized approach is essential to optimize treatment selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17841,"journal":{"name":"Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery","volume":"78 7","pages":"492-496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in the Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Era:Reassessment of Indications and Strategies].\",\"authors\":\"Shin Tanaka, Yasuaki Tomioka, Haruchika Yamamoto, Hidejiro Torigoe, Kazuhiko Shien, Ken Suzawa, Kentaroh Miyoshi, Mikio Okazaki, Seiichiro Sugimoto, Shinichi Toyooka\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction( BLVR) and lung volume reduction surgery( LVRS) represent two complementary strategies in the management of advanced emphysema. BLVR has emerged as a minimally invasive and reversible approach, demonstrating significant clinical benefit in carefully selected patients without collateral ventilation, supported by advances in physiological assessment and imaging technologies. LVRS, by contrast, remains a well-validated surgical option offering sustained improvements in pulmonary mechanics, exercise tolerance, and quality of life, particularly in patients with heterogeneous upper-lobe predominant disease. Recent randomized trials have underscored the comparable efficacy of both modalities, highlighting the need for individualized, phenotype-driven treatment planning. A multidisciplinary, individualized approach is essential to optimize treatment selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery\",\"volume\":\"78 7\",\"pages\":\"492-496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in the Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Era:Reassessment of Indications and Strategies].
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction( BLVR) and lung volume reduction surgery( LVRS) represent two complementary strategies in the management of advanced emphysema. BLVR has emerged as a minimally invasive and reversible approach, demonstrating significant clinical benefit in carefully selected patients without collateral ventilation, supported by advances in physiological assessment and imaging technologies. LVRS, by contrast, remains a well-validated surgical option offering sustained improvements in pulmonary mechanics, exercise tolerance, and quality of life, particularly in patients with heterogeneous upper-lobe predominant disease. Recent randomized trials have underscored the comparable efficacy of both modalities, highlighting the need for individualized, phenotype-driven treatment planning. A multidisciplinary, individualized approach is essential to optimize treatment selection.