Emily Huanke Liu, Daniel Carrion, Mohamed Khaldoun Badawy
{"title":"使用卷积神经网络对次优胸片进行分类。","authors":"Emily Huanke Liu, Daniel Carrion, Mohamed Khaldoun Badawy","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chest X-rays (CXR) rank among the most conducted X-ray examinations. They often require repeat imaging due to inadequate quality, leading to increased radiation exposure and delays in patient care and diagnosis. This research assesses the efficacy of DenseNet121 and YOLOv8 neural networks in detecting suboptimal CXRs, which may minimise delays and enhance patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included 3587 patients with a median age of 67 (0-102). It utilised an initial dataset comprising 10,000 CXRs randomly divided into a training subset (4000 optimal and 4000 suboptimal) and a validation subset (400 optimal and 400 suboptimal). The test subset (25 optimal and 25 suboptimal) was curated from the remaining images to provide adequate variation. Neural networks DenseNet121 and YOLOv8 were chosen due to their capabilities in image classification. DenseNet121 is a robust, well-tested model in the medical industry with high accuracy in object recognition. YOLOv8 is a cutting-edge commercial model targeted at all industries. Their performance was assessed via the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and compared to radiologist classification, utilising the chi-squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DenseNet121 attained an AUROC of 0.97, while YOLOv8 recorded a score of 0.95, indicating a strong capability in differentiating between optimal and suboptimal CXRs. The alignment between radiologists and models exhibited variability, partly due to the lack of clinical indications. However, the performance was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both AI models effectively classified chest X-ray quality, demonstrating the potential for providing radiographers with feedback to improve image quality. Notably, this was the first study to include both PA and lateral CXRs as well as paediatric cases and the first to evaluate YOLOv8 for this application.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Convolutional Neural Networks for the Classification of Suboptimal Chest Radiographs.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Huanke Liu, Daniel Carrion, Mohamed Khaldoun Badawy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmrs.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chest X-rays (CXR) rank among the most conducted X-ray examinations. They often require repeat imaging due to inadequate quality, leading to increased radiation exposure and delays in patient care and diagnosis. This research assesses the efficacy of DenseNet121 and YOLOv8 neural networks in detecting suboptimal CXRs, which may minimise delays and enhance patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included 3587 patients with a median age of 67 (0-102). It utilised an initial dataset comprising 10,000 CXRs randomly divided into a training subset (4000 optimal and 4000 suboptimal) and a validation subset (400 optimal and 400 suboptimal). The test subset (25 optimal and 25 suboptimal) was curated from the remaining images to provide adequate variation. Neural networks DenseNet121 and YOLOv8 were chosen due to their capabilities in image classification. DenseNet121 is a robust, well-tested model in the medical industry with high accuracy in object recognition. YOLOv8 is a cutting-edge commercial model targeted at all industries. Their performance was assessed via the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and compared to radiologist classification, utilising the chi-squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DenseNet121 attained an AUROC of 0.97, while YOLOv8 recorded a score of 0.95, indicating a strong capability in differentiating between optimal and suboptimal CXRs. The alignment between radiologists and models exhibited variability, partly due to the lack of clinical indications. However, the performance was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both AI models effectively classified chest X-ray quality, demonstrating the potential for providing radiographers with feedback to improve image quality. Notably, this was the first study to include both PA and lateral CXRs as well as paediatric cases and the first to evaluate YOLOv8 for this application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using Convolutional Neural Networks for the Classification of Suboptimal Chest Radiographs.
Introduction: Chest X-rays (CXR) rank among the most conducted X-ray examinations. They often require repeat imaging due to inadequate quality, leading to increased radiation exposure and delays in patient care and diagnosis. This research assesses the efficacy of DenseNet121 and YOLOv8 neural networks in detecting suboptimal CXRs, which may minimise delays and enhance patient outcomes.
Method: The study included 3587 patients with a median age of 67 (0-102). It utilised an initial dataset comprising 10,000 CXRs randomly divided into a training subset (4000 optimal and 4000 suboptimal) and a validation subset (400 optimal and 400 suboptimal). The test subset (25 optimal and 25 suboptimal) was curated from the remaining images to provide adequate variation. Neural networks DenseNet121 and YOLOv8 were chosen due to their capabilities in image classification. DenseNet121 is a robust, well-tested model in the medical industry with high accuracy in object recognition. YOLOv8 is a cutting-edge commercial model targeted at all industries. Their performance was assessed via the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and compared to radiologist classification, utilising the chi-squared test.
Results: DenseNet121 attained an AUROC of 0.97, while YOLOv8 recorded a score of 0.95, indicating a strong capability in differentiating between optimal and suboptimal CXRs. The alignment between radiologists and models exhibited variability, partly due to the lack of clinical indications. However, the performance was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Both AI models effectively classified chest X-ray quality, demonstrating the potential for providing radiographers with feedback to improve image quality. Notably, this was the first study to include both PA and lateral CXRs as well as paediatric cases and the first to evaluate YOLOv8 for this application.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).