Thomas Larssen, Ole J Glesaaen, Jo Bruusgaard, Martin F Strand, John M Kalhovde, Espen Tønnessen, Thomas Haugen
{"title":"乳酸阈值测试结果的比较研究:步行与跑步。","authors":"Thomas Larssen, Ole J Glesaaen, Jo Bruusgaard, Martin F Strand, John M Kalhovde, Espen Tønnessen, Thomas Haugen","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.25.17054-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although lactate threshold (LT) tests are widely used by athletes to evaluate endurance performance, such tests are not commonly applied in health controls among recreationally active subjects. This study aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability of walking as an exercise modality during LT testing and compare the test outcomes with those obtained during running.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three male and female participants (25±3 year, 172±8 cm, 70±13 kg, and maximal oxygen consumption [VO<inf>2max</inf>] 51±5 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) performed four LT tests within 2-3 weeks, either using walking or running (two tests in each condition) protocols. The running tests were performed on a flat treadmill, and the pace increased by 1 km·h<sup>-1</sup> for each stage. During the walking tests, the pace was set to 6.5 km·h<sup>-1</sup>, and the incline increased by 2.5% for each stage. LT was determined based on a fixed blood lactate concentration of 4.0 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similar reliability values were observed for the walking and running protocol, and all between-trial differences were trivial or small. Significantly lower heart rate at LT was observed for the walking vs. running condition, but all between-modality differences were trivial or small. Analysis revealed that LT occurred at a slightly lower workload in walking than running (11.4±1.4 vs. 12.0±1.3 metabolic equivalents [METs]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the trivial to small differences in LT variables observed between running and walking, these two protocols cannot be used interchangeably. However, the present study shows that walking represents an alternative exercise modality during LT testing in recreationally active subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":"1330-1336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of lactate threshold testing outcomes: walking vs. running.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Larssen, Ole J Glesaaen, Jo Bruusgaard, Martin F Strand, John M Kalhovde, Espen Tønnessen, Thomas Haugen\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0022-4707.25.17054-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although lactate threshold (LT) tests are widely used by athletes to evaluate endurance performance, such tests are not commonly applied in health controls among recreationally active subjects. This study aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability of walking as an exercise modality during LT testing and compare the test outcomes with those obtained during running.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three male and female participants (25±3 year, 172±8 cm, 70±13 kg, and maximal oxygen consumption [VO<inf>2max</inf>] 51±5 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) performed four LT tests within 2-3 weeks, either using walking or running (two tests in each condition) protocols. The running tests were performed on a flat treadmill, and the pace increased by 1 km·h<sup>-1</sup> for each stage. During the walking tests, the pace was set to 6.5 km·h<sup>-1</sup>, and the incline increased by 2.5% for each stage. LT was determined based on a fixed blood lactate concentration of 4.0 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similar reliability values were observed for the walking and running protocol, and all between-trial differences were trivial or small. Significantly lower heart rate at LT was observed for the walking vs. running condition, but all between-modality differences were trivial or small. Analysis revealed that LT occurred at a slightly lower workload in walking than running (11.4±1.4 vs. 12.0±1.3 metabolic equivalents [METs]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the trivial to small differences in LT variables observed between running and walking, these two protocols cannot be used interchangeably. However, the present study shows that walking represents an alternative exercise modality during LT testing in recreationally active subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1330-1336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.25.17054-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.25.17054-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管乳酸门槛(LT)测试被运动员广泛用于评估耐力表现,但这种测试通常不应用于娱乐性活动受试者的健康对照。本研究旨在调查在LT测试中步行作为一种运动方式的测试-重测信度,并将测试结果与跑步测试结果进行比较。方法:23名男性和女性参与者(25±3岁,172±8 cm, 70±13 kg,最大耗氧量[VO2max] 51±5 mL·kg-1·min-1)在2-3周内进行了4次LT测试,采用步行或跑步(每种情况下两次测试)方案。跑步试验在平板跑步机上进行,每段速度增加1 km·h-1。在步行测试中,速度设定为6.5 km·h-1,坡度每段增加2.5%。以固定血乳酸浓度4.0 mmol·L-1测定乳酸浓度。结果:在步行和跑步方案中观察到相似的可靠性值,所有试验之间的差异都是微不足道或很小的。在慢行状态下,步行与跑步的心率明显较低,但所有模式之间的差异都微不足道或很小。分析显示,与跑步相比,步行的负荷稍低(11.4±1.4 vs. 12.0±1.3代谢当量[METs])时发生了LT。结论:考虑到在跑步和步行之间观察到的LT变量的微小差异,这两种方案不能互换使用。然而,目前的研究表明,在娱乐性活动的受试者中,步行是另一种运动方式。
A comparative study of lactate threshold testing outcomes: walking vs. running.
Background: Although lactate threshold (LT) tests are widely used by athletes to evaluate endurance performance, such tests are not commonly applied in health controls among recreationally active subjects. This study aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability of walking as an exercise modality during LT testing and compare the test outcomes with those obtained during running.
Methods: Twenty-three male and female participants (25±3 year, 172±8 cm, 70±13 kg, and maximal oxygen consumption [VO2max] 51±5 mL·kg-1·min-1) performed four LT tests within 2-3 weeks, either using walking or running (two tests in each condition) protocols. The running tests were performed on a flat treadmill, and the pace increased by 1 km·h-1 for each stage. During the walking tests, the pace was set to 6.5 km·h-1, and the incline increased by 2.5% for each stage. LT was determined based on a fixed blood lactate concentration of 4.0 mmol·L-1.
Results: Similar reliability values were observed for the walking and running protocol, and all between-trial differences were trivial or small. Significantly lower heart rate at LT was observed for the walking vs. running condition, but all between-modality differences were trivial or small. Analysis revealed that LT occurred at a slightly lower workload in walking than running (11.4±1.4 vs. 12.0±1.3 metabolic equivalents [METs]).
Conclusions: Given the trivial to small differences in LT variables observed between running and walking, these two protocols cannot be used interchangeably. However, the present study shows that walking represents an alternative exercise modality during LT testing in recreationally active subjects.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.