Michele R Wilson, Pablo Mendez, Cheryl L McDade, Laura Vidal Barrientos, Juan E Megías-Vericat, Gines Escolar, Korinna Karampampa, Marco Panebianco, Songkai Yan
{"title":"西班牙血液- p作为血管性血友病长期预防和按需治疗的预算影响分析","authors":"Michele R Wilson, Pablo Mendez, Cheryl L McDade, Laura Vidal Barrientos, Juan E Megías-Vericat, Gines Escolar, Korinna Karampampa, Marco Panebianco, Songkai Yan","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2535232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A decision-analytic model was developed to assess the Spanish healthcare system budget impact associated with increased use of Haemate-<i>P</i> in individuals with von Willebrand disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model considered long-term prophylaxis and on-demand treatment with each of three von Willebrand factor (vWF) replacement products (Haemate-<i>P</i>, Fanhdi, and Wilate). Two budget scenarios were considered: a status quo scenario (no changes in uptake of products/strategy) and an alternative scenario (increased Haemate-<i>P</i> uptake). The model estimated total product costs and other medical costs for each budget scenario annually over 3 years. Total budget impact was estimated by subtracting the costs for the status quo scenario from the costs for the alternative scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The alternative Haemate-<i>P</i> uptake scenario was estimated to save the Spanish healthcare system €5.64 million over 3 years. Cost savings were driven primarily by a reduction in vWF product costs (-€5.62 million) resulting from a reduction in vWF product use (-€4.80 million) and bleed reductions (-€0.82 million). In univariate and multiway deterministic sensitivity analyses, the alternative scenario remained cost-saving.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Haemate-<i>P</i> was found to be a cost-saving strategy, and increased use of Haemate-<i>P</i> over Fanhdi, and Wilate is expected to reduce overall costs to the healthcare system in Spain.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1183-1190"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Budget impact analysis of Haemate-<i>P</i> as long-term prophylaxis and on-demand therapy for von Willebrand disease in Spain.\",\"authors\":\"Michele R Wilson, Pablo Mendez, Cheryl L McDade, Laura Vidal Barrientos, Juan E Megías-Vericat, Gines Escolar, Korinna Karampampa, Marco Panebianco, Songkai Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2025.2535232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A decision-analytic model was developed to assess the Spanish healthcare system budget impact associated with increased use of Haemate-<i>P</i> in individuals with von Willebrand disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model considered long-term prophylaxis and on-demand treatment with each of three von Willebrand factor (vWF) replacement products (Haemate-<i>P</i>, Fanhdi, and Wilate). Two budget scenarios were considered: a status quo scenario (no changes in uptake of products/strategy) and an alternative scenario (increased Haemate-<i>P</i> uptake). The model estimated total product costs and other medical costs for each budget scenario annually over 3 years. Total budget impact was estimated by subtracting the costs for the status quo scenario from the costs for the alternative scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The alternative Haemate-<i>P</i> uptake scenario was estimated to save the Spanish healthcare system €5.64 million over 3 years. Cost savings were driven primarily by a reduction in vWF product costs (-€5.62 million) resulting from a reduction in vWF product use (-€4.80 million) and bleed reductions (-€0.82 million). In univariate and multiway deterministic sensitivity analyses, the alternative scenario remained cost-saving.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Haemate-<i>P</i> was found to be a cost-saving strategy, and increased use of Haemate-<i>P</i> over Fanhdi, and Wilate is expected to reduce overall costs to the healthcare system in Spain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1183-1190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2535232\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2535232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Budget impact analysis of Haemate-P as long-term prophylaxis and on-demand therapy for von Willebrand disease in Spain.
Objectives: A decision-analytic model was developed to assess the Spanish healthcare system budget impact associated with increased use of Haemate-P in individuals with von Willebrand disease.
Methods: The model considered long-term prophylaxis and on-demand treatment with each of three von Willebrand factor (vWF) replacement products (Haemate-P, Fanhdi, and Wilate). Two budget scenarios were considered: a status quo scenario (no changes in uptake of products/strategy) and an alternative scenario (increased Haemate-P uptake). The model estimated total product costs and other medical costs for each budget scenario annually over 3 years. Total budget impact was estimated by subtracting the costs for the status quo scenario from the costs for the alternative scenario.
Results: The alternative Haemate-P uptake scenario was estimated to save the Spanish healthcare system €5.64 million over 3 years. Cost savings were driven primarily by a reduction in vWF product costs (-€5.62 million) resulting from a reduction in vWF product use (-€4.80 million) and bleed reductions (-€0.82 million). In univariate and multiway deterministic sensitivity analyses, the alternative scenario remained cost-saving.
Conclusion: Haemate-P was found to be a cost-saving strategy, and increased use of Haemate-P over Fanhdi, and Wilate is expected to reduce overall costs to the healthcare system in Spain.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication.
Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience