西班牙血液- p作为血管性血友病长期预防和按需治疗的预算影响分析

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2535232
Michele R Wilson, Pablo Mendez, Cheryl L McDade, Laura Vidal Barrientos, Juan E Megías-Vericat, Gines Escolar, Korinna Karampampa, Marco Panebianco, Songkai Yan
{"title":"西班牙血液- p作为血管性血友病长期预防和按需治疗的预算影响分析","authors":"Michele R Wilson, Pablo Mendez, Cheryl L McDade, Laura Vidal Barrientos, Juan E Megías-Vericat, Gines Escolar, Korinna Karampampa, Marco Panebianco, Songkai Yan","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2535232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A decision-analytic model was developed to assess the Spanish healthcare system budget impact associated with increased use of Haemate-<i>P</i> in individuals with von Willebrand disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model considered long-term prophylaxis and on-demand treatment with each of three von Willebrand factor (vWF) replacement products (Haemate-<i>P</i>, Fanhdi, and Wilate). Two budget scenarios were considered: a status quo scenario (no changes in uptake of products/strategy) and an alternative scenario (increased Haemate-<i>P</i> uptake). The model estimated total product costs and other medical costs for each budget scenario annually over 3 years. Total budget impact was estimated by subtracting the costs for the status quo scenario from the costs for the alternative scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The alternative Haemate-<i>P</i> uptake scenario was estimated to save the Spanish healthcare system €5.64 million over 3 years. Cost savings were driven primarily by a reduction in vWF product costs (-€5.62 million) resulting from a reduction in vWF product use (-€4.80 million) and bleed reductions (-€0.82 million). In univariate and multiway deterministic sensitivity analyses, the alternative scenario remained cost-saving.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Haemate-<i>P</i> was found to be a cost-saving strategy, and increased use of Haemate-<i>P</i> over Fanhdi, and Wilate is expected to reduce overall costs to the healthcare system in Spain.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1183-1190"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Budget impact analysis of Haemate-<i>P</i> as long-term prophylaxis and on-demand therapy for von Willebrand disease in Spain.\",\"authors\":\"Michele R Wilson, Pablo Mendez, Cheryl L McDade, Laura Vidal Barrientos, Juan E Megías-Vericat, Gines Escolar, Korinna Karampampa, Marco Panebianco, Songkai Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2025.2535232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A decision-analytic model was developed to assess the Spanish healthcare system budget impact associated with increased use of Haemate-<i>P</i> in individuals with von Willebrand disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model considered long-term prophylaxis and on-demand treatment with each of three von Willebrand factor (vWF) replacement products (Haemate-<i>P</i>, Fanhdi, and Wilate). Two budget scenarios were considered: a status quo scenario (no changes in uptake of products/strategy) and an alternative scenario (increased Haemate-<i>P</i> uptake). The model estimated total product costs and other medical costs for each budget scenario annually over 3 years. Total budget impact was estimated by subtracting the costs for the status quo scenario from the costs for the alternative scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The alternative Haemate-<i>P</i> uptake scenario was estimated to save the Spanish healthcare system €5.64 million over 3 years. Cost savings were driven primarily by a reduction in vWF product costs (-€5.62 million) resulting from a reduction in vWF product use (-€4.80 million) and bleed reductions (-€0.82 million). In univariate and multiway deterministic sensitivity analyses, the alternative scenario remained cost-saving.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Haemate-<i>P</i> was found to be a cost-saving strategy, and increased use of Haemate-<i>P</i> over Fanhdi, and Wilate is expected to reduce overall costs to the healthcare system in Spain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1183-1190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2535232\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2535232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立一个决策分析模型来评估西班牙医疗保健系统预算影响与血管性血友病患者血红蛋白- p使用增加相关。方法:该模型考虑了三种血管性血友病因子(vWF)替代产品(Haemate-P、Fanhdi和Wilate)的长期预防和按需治疗。考虑了两种预算情景:一种是现状情景(产品/策略的摄取没有变化),另一种是替代情景(血红蛋白- p的摄取增加)。该模型在3年内每年对每个预算方案的产品总成本和其他医疗成本进行估算。总预算影响是通过从备选方案的费用中减去现状方案的费用来估计的。结果:替代血红蛋白- p摄取方案估计在3年内节省西班牙医疗保健系统564万欧元。成本节约主要得益于vWF产品使用减少(- 480万欧元)和放血减少(- 82万欧元),从而降低了vWF产品成本(- 562万欧元)。在单变量和多方向确定性敏感性分析中,替代方案仍然节省成本。结论:发现Haemate-P是一种节省成本的策略,并且在Fanhdi和Wilate的基础上增加了Haemate-P的使用,预计将降低西班牙医疗保健系统的总体成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Budget impact analysis of Haemate-P as long-term prophylaxis and on-demand therapy for von Willebrand disease in Spain.

Objectives: A decision-analytic model was developed to assess the Spanish healthcare system budget impact associated with increased use of Haemate-P in individuals with von Willebrand disease.

Methods: The model considered long-term prophylaxis and on-demand treatment with each of three von Willebrand factor (vWF) replacement products (Haemate-P, Fanhdi, and Wilate). Two budget scenarios were considered: a status quo scenario (no changes in uptake of products/strategy) and an alternative scenario (increased Haemate-P uptake). The model estimated total product costs and other medical costs for each budget scenario annually over 3 years. Total budget impact was estimated by subtracting the costs for the status quo scenario from the costs for the alternative scenario.

Results: The alternative Haemate-P uptake scenario was estimated to save the Spanish healthcare system €5.64 million over 3 years. Cost savings were driven primarily by a reduction in vWF product costs (-€5.62 million) resulting from a reduction in vWF product use (-€4.80 million) and bleed reductions (-€0.82 million). In univariate and multiway deterministic sensitivity analyses, the alternative scenario remained cost-saving.

Conclusion: Haemate-P was found to be a cost-saving strategy, and increased use of Haemate-P over Fanhdi, and Wilate is expected to reduce overall costs to the healthcare system in Spain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信