Javier Tejedor-Tejada, Laura Sanchez-Sanmamed, Benito Hermida, Deepak Madhu, Rui Morais, Sónia Barros, Krzysztof Kurek, Ulrike Beilenhoff, Abdelaleem Helal, Alan Ovalle, Jose M Pérez-Pariente
{"title":"内窥镜医师和内窥镜护士的人体工程学和内窥镜相关伤害。国际多中心调查结果。","authors":"Javier Tejedor-Tejada, Laura Sanchez-Sanmamed, Benito Hermida, Deepak Madhu, Rui Morais, Sónia Barros, Krzysztof Kurek, Ulrike Beilenhoff, Abdelaleem Helal, Alan Ovalle, Jose M Pérez-Pariente","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The aim was to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and patterns of endoscopy-related injury (ERI) and the knowledge of ergonomics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, international, cross-sectional study was conducted using a 21-item electronic survey to investigate ERI. The study included 484 (67.8%) endoscopists and 230 (32.2%) endoscopy nurses from 91 centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 714 respondents (60.5% women, 93% right-handed, median age 40 years [IQR 33-48 years]) from 36 countries participated. Among them, 42.1% of endoscopists and 27.8% of nurses had > 10 years of experience performing endoscopy. ERI affecting at least one anatomic location was reported frequently by 70.1% of endoscopists and 87.8% of nurses (p < 0.001). Additionally, 87.1% of participants experienced pain in multiple areas. ERI was most common in the lower back (70% vs. 85.7%, p < 0.001) and the neck (62.4% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.001) among symptomatic endoscopists and nurses, respectively. Twenty-three percent of symptomatic respondents had modified their endoscopic practice. Among symptomatic respondents, 33% had sought a medical consultation, and 12% had required sick leave. However, only 12.7% of participants reported previous formal ergonomics education. Female gender, level of experience, number of endoscopic procedures, use of one-piece lead aprons, and the profession of endoscopy nursing were identified as factors associated with the development of ERI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of ERI among endoscopists and nurses was very high. The pattern and risk factors for ERI were similar between the two groups. Ergonomics and educational measures for the prevention and management of ERIs are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ergonomics and Endoscopy-Related Injuries Among Endoscopists and Endoscopy Nurses. Results of International Multicenter Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Javier Tejedor-Tejada, Laura Sanchez-Sanmamed, Benito Hermida, Deepak Madhu, Rui Morais, Sónia Barros, Krzysztof Kurek, Ulrike Beilenhoff, Abdelaleem Helal, Alan Ovalle, Jose M Pérez-Pariente\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgh.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The aim was to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and patterns of endoscopy-related injury (ERI) and the knowledge of ergonomics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, international, cross-sectional study was conducted using a 21-item electronic survey to investigate ERI. The study included 484 (67.8%) endoscopists and 230 (32.2%) endoscopy nurses from 91 centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 714 respondents (60.5% women, 93% right-handed, median age 40 years [IQR 33-48 years]) from 36 countries participated. Among them, 42.1% of endoscopists and 27.8% of nurses had > 10 years of experience performing endoscopy. ERI affecting at least one anatomic location was reported frequently by 70.1% of endoscopists and 87.8% of nurses (p < 0.001). Additionally, 87.1% of participants experienced pain in multiple areas. ERI was most common in the lower back (70% vs. 85.7%, p < 0.001) and the neck (62.4% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.001) among symptomatic endoscopists and nurses, respectively. Twenty-three percent of symptomatic respondents had modified their endoscopic practice. Among symptomatic respondents, 33% had sought a medical consultation, and 12% had required sick leave. However, only 12.7% of participants reported previous formal ergonomics education. Female gender, level of experience, number of endoscopic procedures, use of one-piece lead aprons, and the profession of endoscopy nursing were identified as factors associated with the development of ERI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of ERI among endoscopists and nurses was very high. The pattern and risk factors for ERI were similar between the two groups. Ergonomics and educational measures for the prevention and management of ERIs are necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ergonomics and Endoscopy-Related Injuries Among Endoscopists and Endoscopy Nurses. Results of International Multicenter Survey.
Background and aim: The aim was to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and patterns of endoscopy-related injury (ERI) and the knowledge of ergonomics.
Methods: A multicenter, international, cross-sectional study was conducted using a 21-item electronic survey to investigate ERI. The study included 484 (67.8%) endoscopists and 230 (32.2%) endoscopy nurses from 91 centers.
Results: A total of 714 respondents (60.5% women, 93% right-handed, median age 40 years [IQR 33-48 years]) from 36 countries participated. Among them, 42.1% of endoscopists and 27.8% of nurses had > 10 years of experience performing endoscopy. ERI affecting at least one anatomic location was reported frequently by 70.1% of endoscopists and 87.8% of nurses (p < 0.001). Additionally, 87.1% of participants experienced pain in multiple areas. ERI was most common in the lower back (70% vs. 85.7%, p < 0.001) and the neck (62.4% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.001) among symptomatic endoscopists and nurses, respectively. Twenty-three percent of symptomatic respondents had modified their endoscopic practice. Among symptomatic respondents, 33% had sought a medical consultation, and 12% had required sick leave. However, only 12.7% of participants reported previous formal ergonomics education. Female gender, level of experience, number of endoscopic procedures, use of one-piece lead aprons, and the profession of endoscopy nursing were identified as factors associated with the development of ERI.
Conclusions: The prevalence of ERI among endoscopists and nurses was very high. The pattern and risk factors for ERI were similar between the two groups. Ergonomics and educational measures for the prevention and management of ERIs are necessary.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.