Zhomart Orman, Jia Wei Koh, Caroline Trin, Zanfina Ademi, Ella Zomer, Sally Green, Danielle Berkovic, Jenni Ilomaki, J Simon Bell, Danny Liew, Christopher M Reid, Sean Lybrand, Brittany Schoeninger, Stella Talic
{"title":"停用脂质调节剂和未能达到心血管危险人群的目标LDL胆固醇水平","authors":"Zhomart Orman, Jia Wei Koh, Caroline Trin, Zanfina Ademi, Ella Zomer, Sally Green, Danielle Berkovic, Jenni Ilomaki, J Simon Bell, Danny Liew, Christopher M Reid, Sean Lybrand, Brittany Schoeninger, Stella Talic","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control remains suboptimal, with limited evidence on how adherence to lipid-modifying agents (LMAs) varies by atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between LDL-C levels, adherence to LMAs, and ASCVD risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults (n = 4,262) prescribed LMAs between 2013 and 2023 (median age 60 years, 49% male) were categorised into low (<5%), borderline (5% to <7.5%), intermediate (7.5% to <20%), and high (≥20%) 10-year ASCVD risk groups. Adherence was defined as having ≥1 prescription of LMA every 6 months, with adherence trajectories identified over 5 years using group-based trajectory analysis: gradual decline, rapid decline, and early discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average LDL-C decreased from 3.6 ± 1.1 mmol/L (139.2 ± 42.5 mg/dL) to 2.7 ± 1.1 mmol/L (104.4 ± 42.5 mg/dL) across all risk groups, with only 23% achieving <1.8 mmol/L (69.6 mg/dL) and 18% achieving ≥50% reduction. LDL-C was highest in the early discontinuation trajectory, across all ASCVD risk groups, averaging 2.9 mmol/L (112.1 mg/dL) in the low ASCVD risk group (42%), 2.8 mmol/L (108.3 mg/dL) in the borderline (13%), 2.5 mmol/L (96.7 mg/dL) in the intermediate (33%), and 2.3 mmol/L (88.9 mg/dL) in the high-risk group (11%). Higher LDL-C was associated with younger age, being male, non-smoking status, absence of diabetes, untreated blood pressure, early LMA discontinuation, higher total cholesterol ratio, and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term adherence to LMAs remains a challenge, particularly in low-risk. Target achievement was poor, highlighting gaps in therapeutic optimization, patient engagement, and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discontinuation of lipid-modifying agents and failure to achieve target LDL cholesterol levels across cardiovascular risk groups.\",\"authors\":\"Zhomart Orman, Jia Wei Koh, Caroline Trin, Zanfina Ademi, Ella Zomer, Sally Green, Danielle Berkovic, Jenni Ilomaki, J Simon Bell, Danny Liew, Christopher M Reid, Sean Lybrand, Brittany Schoeninger, Stella Talic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.06.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control remains suboptimal, with limited evidence on how adherence to lipid-modifying agents (LMAs) varies by atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between LDL-C levels, adherence to LMAs, and ASCVD risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults (n = 4,262) prescribed LMAs between 2013 and 2023 (median age 60 years, 49% male) were categorised into low (<5%), borderline (5% to <7.5%), intermediate (7.5% to <20%), and high (≥20%) 10-year ASCVD risk groups. Adherence was defined as having ≥1 prescription of LMA every 6 months, with adherence trajectories identified over 5 years using group-based trajectory analysis: gradual decline, rapid decline, and early discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average LDL-C decreased from 3.6 ± 1.1 mmol/L (139.2 ± 42.5 mg/dL) to 2.7 ± 1.1 mmol/L (104.4 ± 42.5 mg/dL) across all risk groups, with only 23% achieving <1.8 mmol/L (69.6 mg/dL) and 18% achieving ≥50% reduction. LDL-C was highest in the early discontinuation trajectory, across all ASCVD risk groups, averaging 2.9 mmol/L (112.1 mg/dL) in the low ASCVD risk group (42%), 2.8 mmol/L (108.3 mg/dL) in the borderline (13%), 2.5 mmol/L (96.7 mg/dL) in the intermediate (33%), and 2.3 mmol/L (88.9 mg/dL) in the high-risk group (11%). Higher LDL-C was associated with younger age, being male, non-smoking status, absence of diabetes, untreated blood pressure, early LMA discontinuation, higher total cholesterol ratio, and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term adherence to LMAs remains a challenge, particularly in low-risk. Target achievement was poor, highlighting gaps in therapeutic optimization, patient engagement, and monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical lipidology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical lipidology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.06.010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.06.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discontinuation of lipid-modifying agents and failure to achieve target LDL cholesterol levels across cardiovascular risk groups.
Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control remains suboptimal, with limited evidence on how adherence to lipid-modifying agents (LMAs) varies by atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk.
Objective: To examine the relationship between LDL-C levels, adherence to LMAs, and ASCVD risk.
Methods: Adults (n = 4,262) prescribed LMAs between 2013 and 2023 (median age 60 years, 49% male) were categorised into low (<5%), borderline (5% to <7.5%), intermediate (7.5% to <20%), and high (≥20%) 10-year ASCVD risk groups. Adherence was defined as having ≥1 prescription of LMA every 6 months, with adherence trajectories identified over 5 years using group-based trajectory analysis: gradual decline, rapid decline, and early discontinuation.
Results: Average LDL-C decreased from 3.6 ± 1.1 mmol/L (139.2 ± 42.5 mg/dL) to 2.7 ± 1.1 mmol/L (104.4 ± 42.5 mg/dL) across all risk groups, with only 23% achieving <1.8 mmol/L (69.6 mg/dL) and 18% achieving ≥50% reduction. LDL-C was highest in the early discontinuation trajectory, across all ASCVD risk groups, averaging 2.9 mmol/L (112.1 mg/dL) in the low ASCVD risk group (42%), 2.8 mmol/L (108.3 mg/dL) in the borderline (13%), 2.5 mmol/L (96.7 mg/dL) in the intermediate (33%), and 2.3 mmol/L (88.9 mg/dL) in the high-risk group (11%). Higher LDL-C was associated with younger age, being male, non-smoking status, absence of diabetes, untreated blood pressure, early LMA discontinuation, higher total cholesterol ratio, and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Conclusion: Long-term adherence to LMAs remains a challenge, particularly in low-risk. Target achievement was poor, highlighting gaps in therapeutic optimization, patient engagement, and monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner.
Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.