亚太地区骨髓纤维化管理的临床实践建议:APAC-MF联盟。

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Keita Kirito, Chul Won Choi, Than Hein, Hsin-An Hou, Chul Won Jung, Yok-Lam Kwong, Garret M K Leung, Melissa G M Ooi, Ponlapat Rojnuckarin, David M Ross, Lee-Yung Shih, Katsuto Takenaka, Winnie Z Y Teo, Harinder Gill
{"title":"亚太地区骨髓纤维化管理的临床实践建议:APAC-MF联盟。","authors":"Keita Kirito, Chul Won Choi, Than Hein, Hsin-An Hou, Chul Won Jung, Yok-Lam Kwong, Garret M K Leung, Melissa G M Ooi, Ponlapat Rojnuckarin, David M Ross, Lee-Yung Shih, Katsuto Takenaka, Winnie Z Y Teo, Harinder Gill","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Myelofibrosis (MF) is a complex and clinically heterogeneous myeloproliferative neoplasm, presenting significant challenges for patient care and clinical decision making. Although global guidelines exist for MF management and continue to evolve with the advent of novel therapies, they do not consider regional variations in drug accessibility nor the availability of diagnostic tools and resources. The notable gap in regional guidance for managing patients with MF in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region has led to regional disparities in patient care practices. To bridge this gap, a steering committee (SC) of 14 expert hematologists from the APAC region collaborated to develop evidence- and consensus-based consensus statements (CSs) for MF management in the APAC region.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>On the basis of evidence from a systematic literature review and their own clinical experience, the SC drafted 13 clinical practice recommendations across four consensus themes: (1) defining the thresholds for anemia and when to initiate or modify treatment; (2) defining when to initiate or modify treatment for thrombocytopenia; (3) defining Janus kinase inhibitor failure and what would warrant switching treatment; and (4) defining the most appropriate risk stratification model for MF in the APAC region. The SC and an extended faculty (EF) of 47 hematologists and two patients voted on the CSs in a modified Delphi process using a 9-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 9 = strongly agree), with consensus achieved when 75% agreed within the range of 7-9.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following amendments to align with EF feedback, consensus was achieved for all 13 CSs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These CSs offer pragmatic guidance tailored to the MF landscape in the APAC region, which aims to enhance the quality of patient care and outcomes. The CSs in this study are formally endorsed by the Asian Myeloid Working Group.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400916"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Practice Recommendations for Myelofibrosis Management in the Asia-Pacific Region: The APAC-MF Alliance.\",\"authors\":\"Keita Kirito, Chul Won Choi, Than Hein, Hsin-An Hou, Chul Won Jung, Yok-Lam Kwong, Garret M K Leung, Melissa G M Ooi, Ponlapat Rojnuckarin, David M Ross, Lee-Yung Shih, Katsuto Takenaka, Winnie Z Y Teo, Harinder Gill\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP-24-00916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Myelofibrosis (MF) is a complex and clinically heterogeneous myeloproliferative neoplasm, presenting significant challenges for patient care and clinical decision making. Although global guidelines exist for MF management and continue to evolve with the advent of novel therapies, they do not consider regional variations in drug accessibility nor the availability of diagnostic tools and resources. The notable gap in regional guidance for managing patients with MF in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region has led to regional disparities in patient care practices. To bridge this gap, a steering committee (SC) of 14 expert hematologists from the APAC region collaborated to develop evidence- and consensus-based consensus statements (CSs) for MF management in the APAC region.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>On the basis of evidence from a systematic literature review and their own clinical experience, the SC drafted 13 clinical practice recommendations across four consensus themes: (1) defining the thresholds for anemia and when to initiate or modify treatment; (2) defining when to initiate or modify treatment for thrombocytopenia; (3) defining Janus kinase inhibitor failure and what would warrant switching treatment; and (4) defining the most appropriate risk stratification model for MF in the APAC region. The SC and an extended faculty (EF) of 47 hematologists and two patients voted on the CSs in a modified Delphi process using a 9-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 9 = strongly agree), with consensus achieved when 75% agreed within the range of 7-9.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following amendments to align with EF feedback, consensus was achieved for all 13 CSs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These CSs offer pragmatic guidance tailored to the MF landscape in the APAC region, which aims to enhance the quality of patient care and outcomes. The CSs in this study are formally endorsed by the Asian Myeloid Working Group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"OP2400916\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00916\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:骨髓纤维化(MF)是一种复杂的、临床异质性的骨髓增生性肿瘤,对患者护理和临床决策提出了重大挑战。尽管存在MF管理的全球指南,并随着新疗法的出现而不断发展,但它们没有考虑到药物可及性的区域差异,也没有考虑到诊断工具和资源的可获得性。亚太(APAC)地区MF患者管理区域指导的显著差距导致了患者护理实践的区域差异。为了弥补这一差距,来自亚太地区的14名血液专家组成的指导委员会(SC)合作制定了亚太地区MF管理的基于证据和共识的共识声明(CSs)。材料和方法:基于系统文献综述的证据和他们自己的临床经验,SC起草了13项临床实践建议,涉及四个共识主题:(1)定义贫血的阈值以及何时开始或修改治疗;(2)确定何时开始或修改血小板减少的治疗;(3)定义Janus激酶抑制剂失效,以及什么需要转换治疗;(4)确定亚太地区MF最适合的风险分层模型。SC和由47名血液学家和两名患者组成的扩展教师(EF)使用9分制(1 =非常不同意,9 =非常同意)在修改后的德尔菲过程中对CSs进行投票,当75%的人同意在7-9的范围内达成共识。结果:根据EF反馈进行修订后,所有13个CSs都达成了共识。结论:这些CSs提供了针对亚太地区MF情况量身定制的实用指南,旨在提高患者护理质量和结果。本研究的CSs得到了亚洲髓细胞工作组的正式认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Practice Recommendations for Myelofibrosis Management in the Asia-Pacific Region: The APAC-MF Alliance.

Purpose: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a complex and clinically heterogeneous myeloproliferative neoplasm, presenting significant challenges for patient care and clinical decision making. Although global guidelines exist for MF management and continue to evolve with the advent of novel therapies, they do not consider regional variations in drug accessibility nor the availability of diagnostic tools and resources. The notable gap in regional guidance for managing patients with MF in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region has led to regional disparities in patient care practices. To bridge this gap, a steering committee (SC) of 14 expert hematologists from the APAC region collaborated to develop evidence- and consensus-based consensus statements (CSs) for MF management in the APAC region.

Materials and methods: On the basis of evidence from a systematic literature review and their own clinical experience, the SC drafted 13 clinical practice recommendations across four consensus themes: (1) defining the thresholds for anemia and when to initiate or modify treatment; (2) defining when to initiate or modify treatment for thrombocytopenia; (3) defining Janus kinase inhibitor failure and what would warrant switching treatment; and (4) defining the most appropriate risk stratification model for MF in the APAC region. The SC and an extended faculty (EF) of 47 hematologists and two patients voted on the CSs in a modified Delphi process using a 9-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 9 = strongly agree), with consensus achieved when 75% agreed within the range of 7-9.

Results: Following amendments to align with EF feedback, consensus was achieved for all 13 CSs.

Conclusion: These CSs offer pragmatic guidance tailored to the MF landscape in the APAC region, which aims to enhance the quality of patient care and outcomes. The CSs in this study are formally endorsed by the Asian Myeloid Working Group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信