聚酰胺胺和生物活性玻璃改性的玻璃离聚体水泥的抗菌活性评价:体外研究。

IF 2.7 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dalia Mohamed Elbahi, Rania El-Saady Badawy, Saber Ahmed Mohamed Ibrahim, Mariam Hassan, Nour Ahmed Habib
{"title":"聚酰胺胺和生物活性玻璃改性的玻璃离聚体水泥的抗菌活性评价:体外研究。","authors":"Dalia Mohamed Elbahi, Rania El-Saady Badawy, Saber Ahmed Mohamed Ibrahim, Mariam Hassan, Nour Ahmed Habib","doi":"10.17219/dmp/166140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Secondary caries is one of the main reasons for the clinical failure in dental restorations. Therefore, it is preferable for restorative materials to possess antibacterial properties, which support a longlasting restoration.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of both the polyamidoamine (PAMAM) liquid and bioactive glass (BAG) powder added to glass ionomer cements (GICs) on their antibacterial properties.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Polyamidoamine was prepared and characterized. Four groups were distinguished, as follows: GI - samples of commercially available GIC (control); GII - samples of GIC mixed with PAMAM; GIII - samples of GIC mixed with BAG; and GIV - samples of GIC mixed with PAMAM and BAG.The biofilm assessment test was conducted using a colony forming unit (CFU) count, and the ion release test was used to quantify the amount of released silica (Si), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (Ph), and sodium (Na) ions in mg/L. Thirty-six samples were prepared for each test. Furthermore, the pH of the soaking solution was measured for each sample in the ion release test. The parametric data was examined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post-hoc test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The biofilm assessment test revealed a significant reduction in the recovered Streptococcus mutans counts in all modified groups compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Also, the ion release test demonstrated a significant increase in the release of Si and Na ions for all modified groups compared to the control group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modification of GICs with PAMAM and BAG enhances their antibacterial properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the antibacterial activity of glass ionomer cements modified by polyamidoamine and bioactive glass: An in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Dalia Mohamed Elbahi, Rania El-Saady Badawy, Saber Ahmed Mohamed Ibrahim, Mariam Hassan, Nour Ahmed Habib\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/dmp/166140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Secondary caries is one of the main reasons for the clinical failure in dental restorations. Therefore, it is preferable for restorative materials to possess antibacterial properties, which support a longlasting restoration.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of both the polyamidoamine (PAMAM) liquid and bioactive glass (BAG) powder added to glass ionomer cements (GICs) on their antibacterial properties.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Polyamidoamine was prepared and characterized. Four groups were distinguished, as follows: GI - samples of commercially available GIC (control); GII - samples of GIC mixed with PAMAM; GIII - samples of GIC mixed with BAG; and GIV - samples of GIC mixed with PAMAM and BAG.The biofilm assessment test was conducted using a colony forming unit (CFU) count, and the ion release test was used to quantify the amount of released silica (Si), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (Ph), and sodium (Na) ions in mg/L. Thirty-six samples were prepared for each test. Furthermore, the pH of the soaking solution was measured for each sample in the ion release test. The parametric data was examined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post-hoc test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The biofilm assessment test revealed a significant reduction in the recovered Streptococcus mutans counts in all modified groups compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Also, the ion release test demonstrated a significant increase in the release of Si and Na ions for all modified groups compared to the control group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modification of GICs with PAMAM and BAG enhances their antibacterial properties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/166140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/166140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:继发性龋病是临床牙体修复失败的主要原因之一。因此,修复材料最好具有抗菌特性,从而支持持久的修复。目的:通过体外实验研究在玻璃离子水结剂(gic)中添加聚酰胺胺(PAMAM)液体和生物活性玻璃(BAG)粉末对其抗菌性能的影响。材料和方法:制备了聚酰胺胺并对其进行了表征。分为四组:GI -市售GIC样品(对照组);GII -与PAMAM混合的GIC样品;GIII - GIC与BAG混合样品;与PAMAM和BAG混合的GIC样品。采用菌落形成单位(CFU)计数法进行生物膜评价试验,采用离子释放试验定量测定硅(Si)、钙(Ca)、磷(Ph)、钠(Na)离子的释放量(mg/L)。每次试验准备36个样品。此外,在离子释放试验中测量了每个样品的浸泡溶液的pH值。参数数据采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验进行检验。结果:生物膜评估试验显示,与对照组相比,所有修饰组的变形链球菌恢复计数均显著降低(p < 0.05)。离子释放试验显示,与对照组相比,各修饰组的Si和Na离子释放量均显著增加(p < 0.05)。结论:PAMAM和BAG对GICs进行改性,增强了GICs的抗菌性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the antibacterial activity of glass ionomer cements modified by polyamidoamine and bioactive glass: An in vitro study.

Background: Secondary caries is one of the main reasons for the clinical failure in dental restorations. Therefore, it is preferable for restorative materials to possess antibacterial properties, which support a longlasting restoration.

Objectives: The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of both the polyamidoamine (PAMAM) liquid and bioactive glass (BAG) powder added to glass ionomer cements (GICs) on their antibacterial properties.

Material and methods: Polyamidoamine was prepared and characterized. Four groups were distinguished, as follows: GI - samples of commercially available GIC (control); GII - samples of GIC mixed with PAMAM; GIII - samples of GIC mixed with BAG; and GIV - samples of GIC mixed with PAMAM and BAG.The biofilm assessment test was conducted using a colony forming unit (CFU) count, and the ion release test was used to quantify the amount of released silica (Si), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (Ph), and sodium (Na) ions in mg/L. Thirty-six samples were prepared for each test. Furthermore, the pH of the soaking solution was measured for each sample in the ion release test. The parametric data was examined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post-hoc test.

Results: The biofilm assessment test revealed a significant reduction in the recovered Streptococcus mutans counts in all modified groups compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Also, the ion release test demonstrated a significant increase in the release of Si and Na ions for all modified groups compared to the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The modification of GICs with PAMAM and BAG enhances their antibacterial properties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信