口腔内扫描仪校准前后准确性的比较:一项体外研究。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mehmet Gümüş Kanmaz, Genta Agani Sabah, Melin Balcı, Müfide Bengü Erden
{"title":"口腔内扫描仪校准前后准确性的比较:一项体外研究。","authors":"Mehmet Gümüş Kanmaz, Genta Agani Sabah, Melin Balcı, Müfide Bengü Erden","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06584-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoral scanners are an essential part of modern digital dentistry, yet the influence of calibration on their accuracy remains underexplored. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of calibration on the scanning accuracy of the TRIOS 3 intraoral scanner after a noncalibrated period of 324 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Digital impressions of upper and lower full-arch phantom jaw models were obtained before and after calibration using the TRIOS 3 intraoral scanner (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark; software version 22.1.1). A total of 20 scans (five before and five after calibration for each jaw) were acquired by a single experienced operator. Reference scans were obtained with an extraoral scanner (E4, 3Shape, Denmark). Linear measurements (intermolar and interpremolar) and three-dimensional superimposition parameters (Absolute Average, Root Mean Square, and (90-10)/2) were used to assess trueness and precision. All measurements were performed using Medit Link software (version 3.3.6; Medit).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Assessment of method error demonstrated excellent intrarater reliability for all trueness and precision parameters (ICC > 0.994, P < 0.001). Statistical analyses revealed minor differences in linear measurements and three-dimensional superimposition values before and after calibration, none of which reached statistical significance (P > 0.05). Regarding trueness, the upper jaw showed slightly increased Absolute Average (0.068 ± 0.004) and (90-10)/2 values (0.093 ± 0.006) after calibration compared to before calibration (0.065 ± 0.003 and 0.087 ± 0.006, respectively), while the lower jaw exhibited higher Root Mean Square values after calibration (0.088 ± 0.008) than before (0.076 ± 0.006). Precision results showed a slightly increased Absolute Average (0.029 ± 0.003), Root Mean Square (0.064 ± 0.006) and (90 - 10)/2 (0.036 ± 0.006) values in the upper jaw, and Root Mean Square (0.095 ± 0.010) values in the lower jaw after calibration. Trueness and precision of linear measurements also showed a general decrease after calibration in both jaws, though the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study show that the TRIOS 3 intraoral scanner maintained its accuracy without calibration for up to 324 days, suggesting that occasional deviations from manufacturer-recommended calibration intervals may not compromise scan quality. However, adherence to routine calibration is recommended until further evidence is available.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of intraoral scanner accuracy before and after calibration: an in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Gümüş Kanmaz, Genta Agani Sabah, Melin Balcı, Müfide Bengü Erden\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12903-025-06584-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoral scanners are an essential part of modern digital dentistry, yet the influence of calibration on their accuracy remains underexplored. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of calibration on the scanning accuracy of the TRIOS 3 intraoral scanner after a noncalibrated period of 324 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Digital impressions of upper and lower full-arch phantom jaw models were obtained before and after calibration using the TRIOS 3 intraoral scanner (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark; software version 22.1.1). A total of 20 scans (five before and five after calibration for each jaw) were acquired by a single experienced operator. Reference scans were obtained with an extraoral scanner (E4, 3Shape, Denmark). Linear measurements (intermolar and interpremolar) and three-dimensional superimposition parameters (Absolute Average, Root Mean Square, and (90-10)/2) were used to assess trueness and precision. All measurements were performed using Medit Link software (version 3.3.6; Medit).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Assessment of method error demonstrated excellent intrarater reliability for all trueness and precision parameters (ICC > 0.994, P < 0.001). Statistical analyses revealed minor differences in linear measurements and three-dimensional superimposition values before and after calibration, none of which reached statistical significance (P > 0.05). Regarding trueness, the upper jaw showed slightly increased Absolute Average (0.068 ± 0.004) and (90-10)/2 values (0.093 ± 0.006) after calibration compared to before calibration (0.065 ± 0.003 and 0.087 ± 0.006, respectively), while the lower jaw exhibited higher Root Mean Square values after calibration (0.088 ± 0.008) than before (0.076 ± 0.006). Precision results showed a slightly increased Absolute Average (0.029 ± 0.003), Root Mean Square (0.064 ± 0.006) and (90 - 10)/2 (0.036 ± 0.006) values in the upper jaw, and Root Mean Square (0.095 ± 0.010) values in the lower jaw after calibration. Trueness and precision of linear measurements also showed a general decrease after calibration in both jaws, though the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study show that the TRIOS 3 intraoral scanner maintained its accuracy without calibration for up to 324 days, suggesting that occasional deviations from manufacturer-recommended calibration intervals may not compromise scan quality. However, adherence to routine calibration is recommended until further evidence is available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06584-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06584-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:口腔内扫描仪是现代数字牙科的重要组成部分,但校准对其准确性的影响仍未得到充分探讨。本体外研究旨在评估在324天的非校准期后,校准对TRIOS 3口内扫描仪扫描精度的影响。方法:采用TRIOS 3口腔内扫描仪(3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark;软件版本22.1.1)。由一名经验丰富的操作员获得了20次扫描(每个颌骨校准前5次,校准后5次)。参考扫描用口外扫描仪获得(E4, 3Shape,丹麦)。线性测量(臼齿间测量和解释臼齿测量)和三维叠加参数(绝对平均值、均方根和(90-10)/2)用于评估准确性和精度。所有测量均使用Medit Link软件(版本3.3.6;Medit)。结果:方法误差评估结果表明,方法的所有真实度和精密度参数具有良好的内部信度(ICC > 0.994, P 0.05)。校正后上颌的绝对平均值(Absolute Average)(0.068±0.004)和(90-10)/2值(0.093±0.006)略高于校正前(分别为0.065±0.003和0.087±0.006),下颌骨的均方根值(Root Mean Square)(0.088±0.008)略高于校正前(0.076±0.006)。精度结果显示,校正后上颌的绝对平均值(0.029±0.003)、均方根(0.064±0.006)和(90 - 10)/2(0.036±0.006)和下颌骨的均方根(0.095±0.010)值均略有升高。校正后双颌线性测量的正确率和精度也普遍下降,但差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:本研究结果表明,TRIOS 3口内扫描仪在无需校准的情况下保持其准确性长达324天,这表明偶尔偏离制造商推荐的校准间隔可能不会影响扫描质量。然而,在获得进一步证据之前,建议坚持常规校准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of intraoral scanner accuracy before and after calibration: an in vitro study.

Background: Intraoral scanners are an essential part of modern digital dentistry, yet the influence of calibration on their accuracy remains underexplored. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of calibration on the scanning accuracy of the TRIOS 3 intraoral scanner after a noncalibrated period of 324 days.

Methods: Digital impressions of upper and lower full-arch phantom jaw models were obtained before and after calibration using the TRIOS 3 intraoral scanner (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark; software version 22.1.1). A total of 20 scans (five before and five after calibration for each jaw) were acquired by a single experienced operator. Reference scans were obtained with an extraoral scanner (E4, 3Shape, Denmark). Linear measurements (intermolar and interpremolar) and three-dimensional superimposition parameters (Absolute Average, Root Mean Square, and (90-10)/2) were used to assess trueness and precision. All measurements were performed using Medit Link software (version 3.3.6; Medit).

Results: Assessment of method error demonstrated excellent intrarater reliability for all trueness and precision parameters (ICC > 0.994, P < 0.001). Statistical analyses revealed minor differences in linear measurements and three-dimensional superimposition values before and after calibration, none of which reached statistical significance (P > 0.05). Regarding trueness, the upper jaw showed slightly increased Absolute Average (0.068 ± 0.004) and (90-10)/2 values (0.093 ± 0.006) after calibration compared to before calibration (0.065 ± 0.003 and 0.087 ± 0.006, respectively), while the lower jaw exhibited higher Root Mean Square values after calibration (0.088 ± 0.008) than before (0.076 ± 0.006). Precision results showed a slightly increased Absolute Average (0.029 ± 0.003), Root Mean Square (0.064 ± 0.006) and (90 - 10)/2 (0.036 ± 0.006) values in the upper jaw, and Root Mean Square (0.095 ± 0.010) values in the lower jaw after calibration. Trueness and precision of linear measurements also showed a general decrease after calibration in both jaws, though the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: The findings of this study show that the TRIOS 3 intraoral scanner maintained its accuracy without calibration for up to 324 days, suggesting that occasional deviations from manufacturer-recommended calibration intervals may not compromise scan quality. However, adherence to routine calibration is recommended until further evidence is available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信