评估参与性组织干预对减少急诊科环境中职业压力的影响:一组前测后测设计

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hendrik Van Simaeys, Lore Mannaerts, Brecht Serraes, Els Clays
{"title":"评估参与性组织干预对减少急诊科环境中职业压力的影响:一组前测后测设计","authors":"Hendrik Van Simaeys, Lore Mannaerts, Brecht Serraes, Els Clays","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-23540-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational stress among healthcare professionals, especially those in emergency departments, is associated with high job demands and inadequate resources, impacting both service delivery and worker well-being. This study explored a participatory organizational intervention intended to reduce stress and improve working conditions among emergency department staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A one-group pretest‒posttest design was used to examine changes in outcomes among healthcare professionals (n = 59). Standardized self-report questionnaires administered before and after the intervention assessed perceived stress levels, psychosocial work factors, and general satisfaction. The nine-week intervention consisted of structured group discussions to identify stressors and co-develop solutions, followed by targeted adjustments in work processes and the environment. The primary outcome was perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10, PSS-10). Secondary outcomes included working conditions (Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire, DPQ). Paired samples t-tests compared pre- and posttest scores, and Pearson correlations assessed associations between process indicators and changes in perceived stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postintervention findings indicated a marginally significant reduction in perceived stress and improvements in several aspects of the psychosocial work environment, including work‒life balance and supervisory recognition. These results suggest that the participatory intervention may be associated with improvements in the perceived work environment. Process evaluation results indicated moderate employee engagement, with generally positive perceptions of involvement and overall satisfaction. A marginally significant negative correlation was found between employee involvement and stress reduction, suggesting that greater involvement was associated with greater decreases in perceived stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the absence of a control group limits causal inference, the study offers exploratory evidence that participatory organizational approaches may be linked to perceived improvements in staff well-being and working conditions in emergency care settings. Further research using comparative designs is needed to confirm these preliminary findings and to better understand how participatory interventions might contribute to workforce sustainability in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"2480"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the impact of a participatory organizational intervention on reducing occupational stress in an emergency department setting: a one group pretest-posttest design.\",\"authors\":\"Hendrik Van Simaeys, Lore Mannaerts, Brecht Serraes, Els Clays\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-025-23540-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational stress among healthcare professionals, especially those in emergency departments, is associated with high job demands and inadequate resources, impacting both service delivery and worker well-being. This study explored a participatory organizational intervention intended to reduce stress and improve working conditions among emergency department staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A one-group pretest‒posttest design was used to examine changes in outcomes among healthcare professionals (n = 59). Standardized self-report questionnaires administered before and after the intervention assessed perceived stress levels, psychosocial work factors, and general satisfaction. The nine-week intervention consisted of structured group discussions to identify stressors and co-develop solutions, followed by targeted adjustments in work processes and the environment. The primary outcome was perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10, PSS-10). Secondary outcomes included working conditions (Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire, DPQ). Paired samples t-tests compared pre- and posttest scores, and Pearson correlations assessed associations between process indicators and changes in perceived stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postintervention findings indicated a marginally significant reduction in perceived stress and improvements in several aspects of the psychosocial work environment, including work‒life balance and supervisory recognition. These results suggest that the participatory intervention may be associated with improvements in the perceived work environment. Process evaluation results indicated moderate employee engagement, with generally positive perceptions of involvement and overall satisfaction. A marginally significant negative correlation was found between employee involvement and stress reduction, suggesting that greater involvement was associated with greater decreases in perceived stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the absence of a control group limits causal inference, the study offers exploratory evidence that participatory organizational approaches may be linked to perceived improvements in staff well-being and working conditions in emergency care settings. Further research using comparative designs is needed to confirm these preliminary findings and to better understand how participatory interventions might contribute to workforce sustainability in healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"2480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269240/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23540-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23540-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗保健专业人员,特别是急诊科专业人员的职业压力与高工作要求和资源不足有关,影响服务提供和工人福祉。本研究探讨了一种参与式组织干预,旨在减轻急诊科员工的压力,改善工作条件。方法:采用一组前测后测设计来检查医疗保健专业人员(n = 59)的结局变化。在干预前后进行标准化的自我报告问卷,评估感知压力水平、社会心理工作因素和总体满意度。为期九周的干预包括结构化的小组讨论,以确定压力源并共同制定解决方案,然后对工作流程和环境进行有针对性的调整。主要结果是感知压力(感知压力量表-10,PSS-10)。次要结果包括工作条件(丹麦社会心理工作环境问卷,DPQ)。配对样本t检验比较了测试前和测试后的分数,Pearson相关性评估了过程指标与感知压力变化之间的关联。结果:干预后的结果表明,感知压力略有显著减少,心理社会工作环境的几个方面有所改善,包括工作与生活的平衡和主管的认可。这些结果表明,参与式干预可能与感知工作环境的改善有关。过程评估结果表明,员工敬业度适中,总体上对参与和总体满意度有积极的看法。员工投入与压力减少之间存在显著的负相关,这表明员工投入越多,感知压力的减少越多。结论:虽然没有对照组限制了因果推理,但该研究提供了探索性证据,表明参与性组织方法可能与紧急护理环境中工作人员福利和工作条件的改善有关。需要使用比较设计进行进一步研究,以证实这些初步发现,并更好地了解参与性干预措施如何有助于医疗保健劳动力的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the impact of a participatory organizational intervention on reducing occupational stress in an emergency department setting: a one group pretest-posttest design.

Background: Occupational stress among healthcare professionals, especially those in emergency departments, is associated with high job demands and inadequate resources, impacting both service delivery and worker well-being. This study explored a participatory organizational intervention intended to reduce stress and improve working conditions among emergency department staff.

Methods: A one-group pretest‒posttest design was used to examine changes in outcomes among healthcare professionals (n = 59). Standardized self-report questionnaires administered before and after the intervention assessed perceived stress levels, psychosocial work factors, and general satisfaction. The nine-week intervention consisted of structured group discussions to identify stressors and co-develop solutions, followed by targeted adjustments in work processes and the environment. The primary outcome was perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10, PSS-10). Secondary outcomes included working conditions (Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire, DPQ). Paired samples t-tests compared pre- and posttest scores, and Pearson correlations assessed associations between process indicators and changes in perceived stress.

Results: Postintervention findings indicated a marginally significant reduction in perceived stress and improvements in several aspects of the psychosocial work environment, including work‒life balance and supervisory recognition. These results suggest that the participatory intervention may be associated with improvements in the perceived work environment. Process evaluation results indicated moderate employee engagement, with generally positive perceptions of involvement and overall satisfaction. A marginally significant negative correlation was found between employee involvement and stress reduction, suggesting that greater involvement was associated with greater decreases in perceived stress.

Conclusions: While the absence of a control group limits causal inference, the study offers exploratory evidence that participatory organizational approaches may be linked to perceived improvements in staff well-being and working conditions in emergency care settings. Further research using comparative designs is needed to confirm these preliminary findings and to better understand how participatory interventions might contribute to workforce sustainability in healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信