帕金森病深部脑刺激的成本和收益:综述和社会网络分析。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-17 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1809996
Carlos Zúñiga-Ramírez, Katia Carmina Farías-Moreno, Gabriel Moreno, Enrique Gómez-Figueroa, Hernando Efraín Caicedo-Ortíz, José Damián Carrillo-Ruíz
{"title":"帕金森病深部脑刺激的成本和收益:综述和社会网络分析。","authors":"Carlos Zúñiga-Ramírez, Katia Carmina Farías-Moreno, Gabriel Moreno, Enrique Gómez-Figueroa, Hernando Efraín Caicedo-Ortíz, José Damián Carrillo-Ruíz","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1809996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. Levodopa has been considered the best treatment option. However, deep brain stimulation (DBS) use has increased over time, mostly when levodopa-related complications arise.To review the current evidence regarding economic evaluations assessing costs and benefits comparing pharmacological versus surgical treatment among subjects with PD.We searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar) for studies comparing levodopa treatment and DBS among subjects with PD in terms of costs and benefits from therapy.Out of the 107 studies identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the published studies were from Europe. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios have shown variable results, from -€979 to €6,729 per change of 1 point in the score on part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III), while incremental cost-utility ratios depict values as low as €6,700 and as high as $704,906.03 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY).We observed a higher cost during the 1<sup>st</sup> year of DBS implantation due to the surgical procedure itself, subsequently, there was a trend for a lower cost over the following years, with no loss of benefit. Overall, the studies showed DBS as a cost-effective measure at 5-years after implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8694,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","volume":"83 7","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12270636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The costs and benefits of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a review and social network analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Zúñiga-Ramírez, Katia Carmina Farías-Moreno, Gabriel Moreno, Enrique Gómez-Figueroa, Hernando Efraín Caicedo-Ortíz, José Damián Carrillo-Ruíz\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0045-1809996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. Levodopa has been considered the best treatment option. However, deep brain stimulation (DBS) use has increased over time, mostly when levodopa-related complications arise.To review the current evidence regarding economic evaluations assessing costs and benefits comparing pharmacological versus surgical treatment among subjects with PD.We searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar) for studies comparing levodopa treatment and DBS among subjects with PD in terms of costs and benefits from therapy.Out of the 107 studies identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the published studies were from Europe. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios have shown variable results, from -€979 to €6,729 per change of 1 point in the score on part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III), while incremental cost-utility ratios depict values as low as €6,700 and as high as $704,906.03 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY).We observed a higher cost during the 1<sup>st</sup> year of DBS implantation due to the surgical procedure itself, subsequently, there was a trend for a lower cost over the following years, with no loss of benefit. Overall, the studies showed DBS as a cost-effective measure at 5-years after implantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria\",\"volume\":\"83 7\",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12270636/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809996\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

帕金森氏病(PD)是世界上第二常见的神经退行性疾病。左旋多巴被认为是最好的治疗选择。然而,脑深部刺激(DBS)的使用随着时间的推移而增加,主要是在左旋多巴相关并发症出现时。回顾目前关于经济评估的证据,比较PD患者的药物治疗与手术治疗的成本和收益。我们检索了三个数据库(PubMed, Embase和谷歌Scholar),以比较PD患者中左旋多巴治疗和DBS治疗的成本和收益。在确定的107项研究中,有14项符合纳入标准。大多数发表的研究都来自欧洲。增量成本效益比显示出不同的结果,统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS III)第三部分得分每变化1分,从- 979欧元到6,729欧元不等,而增量成本效用比描述的价值低至每质量调整生命年(QALY) 6,700欧元,高至704,906.03美元。我们观察到,由于手术本身的原因,DBS植入第一年的成本较高,随后,在接下来的几年里,成本有降低的趋势,但没有损失效益。总的来说,研究表明DBS在植入后5年是一种具有成本效益的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The costs and benefits of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a review and social network analysis.

The costs and benefits of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a review and social network analysis.

The costs and benefits of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a review and social network analysis.

The costs and benefits of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a review and social network analysis.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. Levodopa has been considered the best treatment option. However, deep brain stimulation (DBS) use has increased over time, mostly when levodopa-related complications arise.To review the current evidence regarding economic evaluations assessing costs and benefits comparing pharmacological versus surgical treatment among subjects with PD.We searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar) for studies comparing levodopa treatment and DBS among subjects with PD in terms of costs and benefits from therapy.Out of the 107 studies identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the published studies were from Europe. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios have shown variable results, from -€979 to €6,729 per change of 1 point in the score on part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III), while incremental cost-utility ratios depict values as low as €6,700 and as high as $704,906.03 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY).We observed a higher cost during the 1st year of DBS implantation due to the surgical procedure itself, subsequently, there was a trend for a lower cost over the following years, with no loss of benefit. Overall, the studies showed DBS as a cost-effective measure at 5-years after implantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
262
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the official journal of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The mission of the journal is to provide neurologists, specialists and researchers in Neurology and related fields with open access to original articles (clinical and translational research), editorials, reviews, historical papers, neuroimages and letters about published manuscripts. It also publishes the consensus and guidelines on Neurology, as well as educational and scientific material from the different scientific departments of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The ultimate goals of the journal are to contribute to advance knowledge in the areas of Neurology and Neuroscience, and to provide valuable material for training and continuing education for neurologists and other health professionals working in the area. These goals might contribute to improving care for patients with neurological diseases. We aim to be the best Neuroscience journal in Latin America within the peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信