Emrah Işıktekin, Burçin Acuner, Merve Torun Karadere, Banu Doğan Gün, Ahmet Eksal Kargı
{"title":"缝合材料对硅胶植入物囊挛缩发展的影响。","authors":"Emrah Işıktekin, Burçin Acuner, Merve Torun Karadere, Banu Doğan Gün, Ahmet Eksal Kargı","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Capsular contracture leads to undesirable outcomes when using breast prostheses. While implant characteristics and surgical techniques have been studied extensively, the impact of suture materials on capsule formation remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of different suture materials on capsular contracture development in a rat model with silicone implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The rats were divided into five groups. Silicone measuring 1.0x1.0x0.5 cm was implanted in the thoracodorsal region. The incisions were closed using poly(glycolide-co-lactide), polypropylene, polydioxanone, glycomer 631, and polyglycolide-co-caprolactone in Groups 1 to 5, respectively. The capsule surrounding the implant was examined in histopathological specimens collected during the 12th week after implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Capsule thickness varied significantly among groups, with Group 1 exhibiting the highest mean thickness and Group 4 the lowest. Inflammation levels also differed, with Group 3 showing the highest proportion of moderate to severe inflammation, whereas Group 4 primarily exhibited mild inflammation. The type of inflammation varied, with Groups 3, 4, and 5 predominantly showing mixed-type inflammation. The presence of foreign body giant cells was highest in Groups 1 and 2, while Group 4 had the lowest. No significant differences were observed in hemosiderin presence, collagen organization, or myofibroblast density.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In terms of the type and degree of inflammation, presence of foreign body giant cells, and average capsule thickness, Group 4 (glycomer 631) suture had the best overall performance, and Group 1 (poly(glycolide-co-lactide) performed the worst. Glycomer 631 sutures may reduce capsular contracture in silicone implant surgeries compared to other suture materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Suture Materials on the Development of Capsular Contracture in Silicone Implants.\",\"authors\":\"Emrah Işıktekin, Burçin Acuner, Merve Torun Karadere, Banu Doğan Gün, Ahmet Eksal Kargı\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjaf140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Capsular contracture leads to undesirable outcomes when using breast prostheses. While implant characteristics and surgical techniques have been studied extensively, the impact of suture materials on capsule formation remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of different suture materials on capsular contracture development in a rat model with silicone implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The rats were divided into five groups. Silicone measuring 1.0x1.0x0.5 cm was implanted in the thoracodorsal region. The incisions were closed using poly(glycolide-co-lactide), polypropylene, polydioxanone, glycomer 631, and polyglycolide-co-caprolactone in Groups 1 to 5, respectively. The capsule surrounding the implant was examined in histopathological specimens collected during the 12th week after implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Capsule thickness varied significantly among groups, with Group 1 exhibiting the highest mean thickness and Group 4 the lowest. Inflammation levels also differed, with Group 3 showing the highest proportion of moderate to severe inflammation, whereas Group 4 primarily exhibited mild inflammation. The type of inflammation varied, with Groups 3, 4, and 5 predominantly showing mixed-type inflammation. The presence of foreign body giant cells was highest in Groups 1 and 2, while Group 4 had the lowest. No significant differences were observed in hemosiderin presence, collagen organization, or myofibroblast density.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In terms of the type and degree of inflammation, presence of foreign body giant cells, and average capsule thickness, Group 4 (glycomer 631) suture had the best overall performance, and Group 1 (poly(glycolide-co-lactide) performed the worst. Glycomer 631 sutures may reduce capsular contracture in silicone implant surgeries compared to other suture materials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf140\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effect of Suture Materials on the Development of Capsular Contracture in Silicone Implants.
Background: Capsular contracture leads to undesirable outcomes when using breast prostheses. While implant characteristics and surgical techniques have been studied extensively, the impact of suture materials on capsule formation remains unclear.
Objectives: To evaluate the effects of different suture materials on capsular contracture development in a rat model with silicone implants.
Methods: The rats were divided into five groups. Silicone measuring 1.0x1.0x0.5 cm was implanted in the thoracodorsal region. The incisions were closed using poly(glycolide-co-lactide), polypropylene, polydioxanone, glycomer 631, and polyglycolide-co-caprolactone in Groups 1 to 5, respectively. The capsule surrounding the implant was examined in histopathological specimens collected during the 12th week after implantation.
Results: Capsule thickness varied significantly among groups, with Group 1 exhibiting the highest mean thickness and Group 4 the lowest. Inflammation levels also differed, with Group 3 showing the highest proportion of moderate to severe inflammation, whereas Group 4 primarily exhibited mild inflammation. The type of inflammation varied, with Groups 3, 4, and 5 predominantly showing mixed-type inflammation. The presence of foreign body giant cells was highest in Groups 1 and 2, while Group 4 had the lowest. No significant differences were observed in hemosiderin presence, collagen organization, or myofibroblast density.
Conclusions: In terms of the type and degree of inflammation, presence of foreign body giant cells, and average capsule thickness, Group 4 (glycomer 631) suture had the best overall performance, and Group 1 (poly(glycolide-co-lactide) performed the worst. Glycomer 631 sutures may reduce capsular contracture in silicone implant surgeries compared to other suture materials.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.