基于体外人类蛋白质组的DIA-NN无库搜索错误发现率评估。

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of Proteome Research Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-18 DOI:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00036
Kongxin Gu, Masanaga Kenko, Koji Ogawa, Naoki Goshima, Takeshi Masuda, Shingo Ito, Sumio Ohtsuki
{"title":"基于体外人类蛋白质组的DIA-NN无库搜索错误发现率评估。","authors":"Kongxin Gu, Masanaga Kenko, Koji Ogawa, Naoki Goshima, Takeshi Masuda, Shingo Ito, Sumio Ohtsuki","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, deep-learning-based <i>in silico</i> spectral libraries have gained increasing attention. Several data-independent acquisition (DIA) software tools have integrated this feature, known as a library-free search, thereby making DIA analysis more accessible. However, controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) is challenging owing to the vast amount of peptide information in <i>in silico</i> libraries. In this study, we introduced a stringent method to evaluate FDR control using DIA software. Recombinant proteins were synthesized from full-length human cDNA libraries and analyzed by using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and DIA software. The results were compared with known protein sequences to calculate the FDR. Notably, we compared the identification performance of DIA-NN versions 1.8.1, 1.9.2, and 2.1.0. Versions 1.9.2 and 2.10 identified more peptides than version 1.8.1, and versions 1.9.2 and 2.1.0 used a more conservative identification approach, thus significantly improving the FDR control. Across the synthesized recombinant protein mixtures, the average FDR at the precursor level was 0.538% for version 1.8.1, 0.389% for version 1.9.2, and 0.385% for version 2.1.0; at the protein level, the FDRs were 2.85%, 1.81%, and 1.81%, respectively. Collectively, our data set provides valuable insights for comparing FDR controls across DIA software and aiding bioinformaticians in enhancing their tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":" ","pages":"3874-3883"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the False Discovery Rate in Library-Free Search by DIA-NN Using <i>In Vitro</i> Human Proteome.\",\"authors\":\"Kongxin Gu, Masanaga Kenko, Koji Ogawa, Naoki Goshima, Takeshi Masuda, Shingo Ito, Sumio Ohtsuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recently, deep-learning-based <i>in silico</i> spectral libraries have gained increasing attention. Several data-independent acquisition (DIA) software tools have integrated this feature, known as a library-free search, thereby making DIA analysis more accessible. However, controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) is challenging owing to the vast amount of peptide information in <i>in silico</i> libraries. In this study, we introduced a stringent method to evaluate FDR control using DIA software. Recombinant proteins were synthesized from full-length human cDNA libraries and analyzed by using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and DIA software. The results were compared with known protein sequences to calculate the FDR. Notably, we compared the identification performance of DIA-NN versions 1.8.1, 1.9.2, and 2.1.0. Versions 1.9.2 and 2.10 identified more peptides than version 1.8.1, and versions 1.9.2 and 2.1.0 used a more conservative identification approach, thus significantly improving the FDR control. Across the synthesized recombinant protein mixtures, the average FDR at the precursor level was 0.538% for version 1.8.1, 0.389% for version 1.9.2, and 0.385% for version 2.1.0; at the protein level, the FDRs were 2.85%, 1.81%, and 1.81%, respectively. Collectively, our data set provides valuable insights for comparing FDR controls across DIA software and aiding bioinformaticians in enhancing their tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Proteome Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3874-3883\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Proteome Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00036\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,基于深度学习的硅谱库越来越受到人们的关注。一些数据独立获取(DIA)软件工具已经集成了这一特性,称为无库搜索,从而使DIA分析更易于访问。然而,由于芯片文库中含有大量的肽信息,控制错误发现率(FDR)是一项挑战。在这项研究中,我们介绍了一个严格的方法来评估FDR控制使用DIA软件。从全长人cDNA文库中合成重组蛋白,采用液相色谱-质谱联用技术和DIA软件进行分析。将结果与已知的蛋白序列进行比较,计算FDR。值得注意的是,我们比较了1.8.1、1.9.2和2.1.0版本的DIA-NN识别性能。版本1.9.2和2.10比版本1.8.1鉴定出更多的多肽,版本1.9.2和2.1.0采用了更保守的鉴定方法,从而显著改善了FDR控制。在合成的重组蛋白混合物中,版本1.8.1、版本1.9.2和版本2.1.0在前体水平上的平均FDR分别为0.538%、0.389%和0.385%;在蛋白质水平上,fdr分别为2.85%、1.81%和1.81%。总的来说,我们的数据集为比较跨DIA软件的FDR控制提供了有价值的见解,并帮助生物信息学家改进他们的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the False Discovery Rate in Library-Free Search by DIA-NN Using In Vitro Human Proteome.

Recently, deep-learning-based in silico spectral libraries have gained increasing attention. Several data-independent acquisition (DIA) software tools have integrated this feature, known as a library-free search, thereby making DIA analysis more accessible. However, controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) is challenging owing to the vast amount of peptide information in in silico libraries. In this study, we introduced a stringent method to evaluate FDR control using DIA software. Recombinant proteins were synthesized from full-length human cDNA libraries and analyzed by using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and DIA software. The results were compared with known protein sequences to calculate the FDR. Notably, we compared the identification performance of DIA-NN versions 1.8.1, 1.9.2, and 2.1.0. Versions 1.9.2 and 2.10 identified more peptides than version 1.8.1, and versions 1.9.2 and 2.1.0 used a more conservative identification approach, thus significantly improving the FDR control. Across the synthesized recombinant protein mixtures, the average FDR at the precursor level was 0.538% for version 1.8.1, 0.389% for version 1.9.2, and 0.385% for version 2.1.0; at the protein level, the FDRs were 2.85%, 1.81%, and 1.81%, respectively. Collectively, our data set provides valuable insights for comparing FDR controls across DIA software and aiding bioinformaticians in enhancing their tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信