Sebastian Scherr , Bolin Cao , Li Crystal Jiang , Tetsuro Kobayashi
{"title":"将AI聊天机器人的使用解释为上下文对齐:跨上下文和文化使用AI聊天机器人背后的动机","authors":"Sebastian Scherr , Bolin Cao , Li Crystal Jiang , Tetsuro Kobayashi","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drawing from the affordances concept in communication and the advertising research principle of context alignment, this study develops a typology of affordances associated with AI chatbot use across diverse contexts and cultures. We argue that the congruence between perceived affordances and the context of use significantly shapes users’ expectations and engagement with AI chatbots. As a first step, we developed a comprehensive set of AI chatbot affordances. Subsequently, we investigated the predictive value of these affordances for chatbot use across five different contexts, including at home, at work, in public spaces, during commuting, and at school. In a total sample of <em>N</em> = 5096 AI chatbot users from mainland China, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States, parallel analysis identified seven general (<em>private social presence</em>, <em>accessibility</em>, <em>persistence</em>, <em>anonymity</em>, <em>bandwidth</em>, <em>editability</em>, and <em>conversation control</em>) and five specific affordances (<em>writing assistance</em>, <em>emotional assistance</em>, <em>coding assistance</em>, <em>personal assistance, translation assistance</em>) for the use of AI chatbots. These affordances consistently predicted context-specific AI chatbot use across cultural boundaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 108738"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining the use of AI chatbots as context alignment: Motivations behind the use of AI chatbots across contexts and culture\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Scherr , Bolin Cao , Li Crystal Jiang , Tetsuro Kobayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Drawing from the affordances concept in communication and the advertising research principle of context alignment, this study develops a typology of affordances associated with AI chatbot use across diverse contexts and cultures. We argue that the congruence between perceived affordances and the context of use significantly shapes users’ expectations and engagement with AI chatbots. As a first step, we developed a comprehensive set of AI chatbot affordances. Subsequently, we investigated the predictive value of these affordances for chatbot use across five different contexts, including at home, at work, in public spaces, during commuting, and at school. In a total sample of <em>N</em> = 5096 AI chatbot users from mainland China, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States, parallel analysis identified seven general (<em>private social presence</em>, <em>accessibility</em>, <em>persistence</em>, <em>anonymity</em>, <em>bandwidth</em>, <em>editability</em>, and <em>conversation control</em>) and five specific affordances (<em>writing assistance</em>, <em>emotional assistance</em>, <em>coding assistance</em>, <em>personal assistance, translation assistance</em>) for the use of AI chatbots. These affordances consistently predicted context-specific AI chatbot use across cultural boundaries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"172 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225001852\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225001852","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Explaining the use of AI chatbots as context alignment: Motivations behind the use of AI chatbots across contexts and culture
Drawing from the affordances concept in communication and the advertising research principle of context alignment, this study develops a typology of affordances associated with AI chatbot use across diverse contexts and cultures. We argue that the congruence between perceived affordances and the context of use significantly shapes users’ expectations and engagement with AI chatbots. As a first step, we developed a comprehensive set of AI chatbot affordances. Subsequently, we investigated the predictive value of these affordances for chatbot use across five different contexts, including at home, at work, in public spaces, during commuting, and at school. In a total sample of N = 5096 AI chatbot users from mainland China, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States, parallel analysis identified seven general (private social presence, accessibility, persistence, anonymity, bandwidth, editability, and conversation control) and five specific affordances (writing assistance, emotional assistance, coding assistance, personal assistance, translation assistance) for the use of AI chatbots. These affordances consistently predicted context-specific AI chatbot use across cultural boundaries.
期刊介绍:
Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.