ipad在写作课堂上的应用:新自由主义、代理和获取

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Todd Ruecker , Tristan Beach , Emily Sawan
{"title":"ipad在写作课堂上的应用:新自由主义、代理和获取","authors":"Todd Ruecker ,&nbsp;Tristan Beach ,&nbsp;Emily Sawan","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The past few decades have seen a variety of technologies enter the writing classroom, although questions over access and digital divides have persisted, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this article, we explore the experiences of students and instructors during the implementation of a universal iPad initiative at an R1 research university aimed in part to alleviate technological divides among students and allow for more seamless integration of technology in instruction. Data are drawn from surveys of 360 students and 35 instructors and interviews with a subset of 6 students and 7 instructors. We explore issues such as the affordances and limitations of the iPad in writing classrooms, how well iPads were integrated into the teaching of reading and writing, and how iPad access enhances or limits student and instructor agency. We conclude by raising questions about the value of universal initiatives that take a one-size-fits-all approach in writing classrooms that prioritize student agency and choice as well as cost concerns in an era of neoliberal budget austerity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 102948"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"iPads in the writing classroom: Neoliberalism, agency, and access\",\"authors\":\"Todd Ruecker ,&nbsp;Tristan Beach ,&nbsp;Emily Sawan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The past few decades have seen a variety of technologies enter the writing classroom, although questions over access and digital divides have persisted, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this article, we explore the experiences of students and instructors during the implementation of a universal iPad initiative at an R1 research university aimed in part to alleviate technological divides among students and allow for more seamless integration of technology in instruction. Data are drawn from surveys of 360 students and 35 instructors and interviews with a subset of 6 students and 7 instructors. We explore issues such as the affordances and limitations of the iPad in writing classrooms, how well iPads were integrated into the teaching of reading and writing, and how iPad access enhances or limits student and instructor agency. We conclude by raising questions about the value of universal initiatives that take a one-size-fits-all approach in writing classrooms that prioritize student agency and choice as well as cost concerns in an era of neoliberal budget austerity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102948\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461525000350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Composition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461525000350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,各种各样的技术进入了写作课堂,尽管关于获取和数字鸿沟的问题仍然存在,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间。在本文中,我们探讨了在R1研究型大学实施通用iPad计划期间学生和教师的经验,该计划的部分目的是减轻学生之间的技术鸿沟,并允许技术在教学中的更无缝集成。数据来自对360名学生和35名教师的调查,以及对6名学生和7名教师的访谈。我们探讨了iPad在写作课堂上的优势和局限性,iPad如何很好地融入阅读和写作教学,以及iPad的使用如何增强或限制学生和教师的能动性。最后,我们提出了一些关于普遍倡议的价值的问题,这些倡议在写作课堂中采取一刀切的方法,优先考虑学生的代理和选择,以及在新自由主义预算紧缩时代的成本问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
iPads in the writing classroom: Neoliberalism, agency, and access
The past few decades have seen a variety of technologies enter the writing classroom, although questions over access and digital divides have persisted, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this article, we explore the experiences of students and instructors during the implementation of a universal iPad initiative at an R1 research university aimed in part to alleviate technological divides among students and allow for more seamless integration of technology in instruction. Data are drawn from surveys of 360 students and 35 instructors and interviews with a subset of 6 students and 7 instructors. We explore issues such as the affordances and limitations of the iPad in writing classrooms, how well iPads were integrated into the teaching of reading and writing, and how iPad access enhances or limits student and instructor agency. We conclude by raising questions about the value of universal initiatives that take a one-size-fits-all approach in writing classrooms that prioritize student agency and choice as well as cost concerns in an era of neoliberal budget austerity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Composition
Computers and Composition Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Composition: An International Journal is devoted to exploring the use of computers in writing classes, writing programs, and writing research. It provides a forum for discussing issues connected with writing and computer use. It also offers information about integrating computers into writing programs on the basis of sound theoretical and pedagogical decisions, and empirical evidence. It welcomes articles, reviews, and letters to the Editors that may be of interest to readers, including descriptions of computer-aided writing and/or reading instruction, discussions of topics related to computer use of software development; explorations of controversial ethical, legal, or social issues related to the use of computers in writing programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信