优化陆上地质碳封存地点的土壤气体监测

IF 5.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Kexin Zhang , Svetlana Stevanovic , William Howcroft , Wendy Timms
{"title":"优化陆上地质碳封存地点的土壤气体监测","authors":"Kexin Zhang ,&nbsp;Svetlana Stevanovic ,&nbsp;William Howcroft ,&nbsp;Wendy Timms","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil gas sampling provides valuable insights for environmental assurance monitoring at carbon capture and storage (CCS) sites. Being a point-source sampling technique, soil gas samples are subject to natural temporal and spatial variabilities. CCS-related soil gas monitoring strategies have evolved over the past decades from intensive sampling to a risk-based approach targeting specific areas. This paper outlines the evolution of monitoring and explores options to optimise monitoring strategies at different spatial resolutions. Sampling approaches were trialled using one year of data collected from an Australian CCS demonstration site, the Otway International Test Centre (OITC), where soil gas was monitored at 124 grid-based locations (100–200 m apart) to achieve multiple monitoring objectives. Results of soil gas CO<sub>2</sub> concentration from the 2022 annual sampling campaign ranged over tenfold (0.04 % to 8.07 %), providing a reasonable characterisation of the natural variability of soil gas composition. This systematic approach was compared with random selections of sampling locations at reduced sampling densities, grid-based sampling at reduced sampling densities, and risk-based monitoring. The combined approach with systematic monitoring and a risk-based approach, depending on the stages of the project, are recommended. Strategy-specific baselines extracted from a comprehensive baseline are recommended to take into consideration spatial variability based on the design and potential changes in long-term monitoring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104437"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising soil gas monitoring at an on-shore geological carbon sequestration site\",\"authors\":\"Kexin Zhang ,&nbsp;Svetlana Stevanovic ,&nbsp;William Howcroft ,&nbsp;Wendy Timms\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Soil gas sampling provides valuable insights for environmental assurance monitoring at carbon capture and storage (CCS) sites. Being a point-source sampling technique, soil gas samples are subject to natural temporal and spatial variabilities. CCS-related soil gas monitoring strategies have evolved over the past decades from intensive sampling to a risk-based approach targeting specific areas. This paper outlines the evolution of monitoring and explores options to optimise monitoring strategies at different spatial resolutions. Sampling approaches were trialled using one year of data collected from an Australian CCS demonstration site, the Otway International Test Centre (OITC), where soil gas was monitored at 124 grid-based locations (100–200 m apart) to achieve multiple monitoring objectives. Results of soil gas CO<sub>2</sub> concentration from the 2022 annual sampling campaign ranged over tenfold (0.04 % to 8.07 %), providing a reasonable characterisation of the natural variability of soil gas composition. This systematic approach was compared with random selections of sampling locations at reduced sampling densities, grid-based sampling at reduced sampling densities, and risk-based monitoring. The combined approach with systematic monitoring and a risk-based approach, depending on the stages of the project, are recommended. Strategy-specific baselines extracted from a comprehensive baseline are recommended to take into consideration spatial variability based on the design and potential changes in long-term monitoring.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583625001355\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583625001355","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤气体采样为碳捕获和储存(CCS)站点的环境保证监测提供了有价值的见解。土壤气体样品是一种点源采样技术,具有自然的时空变异性。在过去的几十年里,与ccs相关的土壤气体监测策略已经从密集采样发展到针对特定区域的基于风险的方法。本文概述了监测的演变,并探讨了在不同空间分辨率下优化监测策略的选择。取样方法使用从澳大利亚CCS示范点Otway国际测试中心(OITC)收集的一年数据进行了试验,该中心在124个基于电网的地点(相距100-200米)监测土壤气体,以实现多个监测目标。2022年年度采样活动的土壤气体CO2浓度范围超过10倍(0.04%至8.07%),提供了土壤气体成分自然变异性的合理表征。将这种系统方法与降低采样密度时随机选择的采样地点、降低采样密度时基于网格的采样以及基于风险的监测进行了比较。建议根据项目的各个阶段,采用系统监测和基于风险的方法相结合的方法。建议从综合基线中提取特定策略的基线,以考虑基于设计和长期监测的潜在变化的空间变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimising soil gas monitoring at an on-shore geological carbon sequestration site
Soil gas sampling provides valuable insights for environmental assurance monitoring at carbon capture and storage (CCS) sites. Being a point-source sampling technique, soil gas samples are subject to natural temporal and spatial variabilities. CCS-related soil gas monitoring strategies have evolved over the past decades from intensive sampling to a risk-based approach targeting specific areas. This paper outlines the evolution of monitoring and explores options to optimise monitoring strategies at different spatial resolutions. Sampling approaches were trialled using one year of data collected from an Australian CCS demonstration site, the Otway International Test Centre (OITC), where soil gas was monitored at 124 grid-based locations (100–200 m apart) to achieve multiple monitoring objectives. Results of soil gas CO2 concentration from the 2022 annual sampling campaign ranged over tenfold (0.04 % to 8.07 %), providing a reasonable characterisation of the natural variability of soil gas composition. This systematic approach was compared with random selections of sampling locations at reduced sampling densities, grid-based sampling at reduced sampling densities, and risk-based monitoring. The combined approach with systematic monitoring and a risk-based approach, depending on the stages of the project, are recommended. Strategy-specific baselines extracted from a comprehensive baseline are recommended to take into consideration spatial variability based on the design and potential changes in long-term monitoring.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信