可再生能源社区与生态转型:博弈论议价方法

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Leonardo Becchetti , Francesco Salustri
{"title":"可再生能源社区与生态转型:博弈论议价方法","authors":"Leonardo Becchetti ,&nbsp;Francesco Salustri","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Renewable energy communities (RECs) are considered a key initiative for ecological transition by international institutions and policymakers. In our article, we analyze how RECs enhance cooperation in ecological transition with a game-theoretic approach. Depending on specific conditions, the interaction among RECs members can be modeled through a Prisoner’s Dilemma or a game where cooperation is the only equilibrium. A REC creates incentives for cooperation through three primary revenue sources: cost savings from self-produced and consumed energy, surplus energy sales, and government incentives. We identify the combination of these factors that leads to a cooperative Nash equilibrium, where the dominant strategy for prosumers is to create a REC with passive consumers.</div><div>We further include bargaining in our model to explain how revenues are distributed between prosumers and passive consumers. Our results indicate that profit-sharing dynamics are influenced by factors such as self-consumption subsidies, energy pricing, and energy storage technology. Finally, we identify key policy parameters that influence REC viability, demonstrating that well-calibrated government incentives can significantly enhance participation and cooperation. Our study fills a gap in the literature by offering a formal strategic model that explains both the coordination mechanisms enabling successful REC formation and the bargaining processes that determine revenue distribution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 102006"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renewable energy communities and the ecological transition: A game theoretic bargaining approach\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Becchetti ,&nbsp;Francesco Salustri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Renewable energy communities (RECs) are considered a key initiative for ecological transition by international institutions and policymakers. In our article, we analyze how RECs enhance cooperation in ecological transition with a game-theoretic approach. Depending on specific conditions, the interaction among RECs members can be modeled through a Prisoner’s Dilemma or a game where cooperation is the only equilibrium. A REC creates incentives for cooperation through three primary revenue sources: cost savings from self-produced and consumed energy, surplus energy sales, and government incentives. We identify the combination of these factors that leads to a cooperative Nash equilibrium, where the dominant strategy for prosumers is to create a REC with passive consumers.</div><div>We further include bargaining in our model to explain how revenues are distributed between prosumers and passive consumers. Our results indicate that profit-sharing dynamics are influenced by factors such as self-consumption subsidies, energy pricing, and energy storage technology. Finally, we identify key policy parameters that influence REC viability, demonstrating that well-calibrated government incentives can significantly enhance participation and cooperation. Our study fills a gap in the literature by offering a formal strategic model that explains both the coordination mechanisms enabling successful REC formation and the bargaining processes that determine revenue distribution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001213\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可再生能源社区(rec)被国际机构和政策制定者视为生态转型的关键举措。本文运用博弈论的方法分析了区域经济合作如何在生态转型中加强合作。根据特定条件,RECs成员之间的互动可以通过囚徒困境或合作是唯一均衡的游戏来建模。REC通过三个主要收入来源为合作创造激励:自产和自用能源的成本节约、剩余能源销售和政府奖励。我们确定了这些因素的组合导致合作纳什均衡,其中产消者的主导策略是与被动消费者创建REC。我们进一步将讨价还价纳入我们的模型,以解释收入如何在主动消费者和被动消费者之间分配。研究结果表明,利润分享动态受到自消费补贴、能源定价和储能技术等因素的影响。最后,我们确定了影响REC可行性的关键政策参数,证明了精心调整的政府激励措施可以显著提高参与和合作。我们的研究填补了文献中的空白,提供了一个正式的战略模型,该模型既解释了使REC成功形成的协调机制,也解释了决定收入分配的议价过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Renewable energy communities and the ecological transition: A game theoretic bargaining approach
Renewable energy communities (RECs) are considered a key initiative for ecological transition by international institutions and policymakers. In our article, we analyze how RECs enhance cooperation in ecological transition with a game-theoretic approach. Depending on specific conditions, the interaction among RECs members can be modeled through a Prisoner’s Dilemma or a game where cooperation is the only equilibrium. A REC creates incentives for cooperation through three primary revenue sources: cost savings from self-produced and consumed energy, surplus energy sales, and government incentives. We identify the combination of these factors that leads to a cooperative Nash equilibrium, where the dominant strategy for prosumers is to create a REC with passive consumers.
We further include bargaining in our model to explain how revenues are distributed between prosumers and passive consumers. Our results indicate that profit-sharing dynamics are influenced by factors such as self-consumption subsidies, energy pricing, and energy storage technology. Finally, we identify key policy parameters that influence REC viability, demonstrating that well-calibrated government incentives can significantly enhance participation and cooperation. Our study fills a gap in the literature by offering a formal strategic model that explains both the coordination mechanisms enabling successful REC formation and the bargaining processes that determine revenue distribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信