{"title":"可再生能源社区与生态转型:博弈论议价方法","authors":"Leonardo Becchetti , Francesco Salustri","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Renewable energy communities (RECs) are considered a key initiative for ecological transition by international institutions and policymakers. In our article, we analyze how RECs enhance cooperation in ecological transition with a game-theoretic approach. Depending on specific conditions, the interaction among RECs members can be modeled through a Prisoner’s Dilemma or a game where cooperation is the only equilibrium. A REC creates incentives for cooperation through three primary revenue sources: cost savings from self-produced and consumed energy, surplus energy sales, and government incentives. We identify the combination of these factors that leads to a cooperative Nash equilibrium, where the dominant strategy for prosumers is to create a REC with passive consumers.</div><div>We further include bargaining in our model to explain how revenues are distributed between prosumers and passive consumers. Our results indicate that profit-sharing dynamics are influenced by factors such as self-consumption subsidies, energy pricing, and energy storage technology. Finally, we identify key policy parameters that influence REC viability, demonstrating that well-calibrated government incentives can significantly enhance participation and cooperation. Our study fills a gap in the literature by offering a formal strategic model that explains both the coordination mechanisms enabling successful REC formation and the bargaining processes that determine revenue distribution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 102006"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renewable energy communities and the ecological transition: A game theoretic bargaining approach\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Becchetti , Francesco Salustri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Renewable energy communities (RECs) are considered a key initiative for ecological transition by international institutions and policymakers. In our article, we analyze how RECs enhance cooperation in ecological transition with a game-theoretic approach. Depending on specific conditions, the interaction among RECs members can be modeled through a Prisoner’s Dilemma or a game where cooperation is the only equilibrium. A REC creates incentives for cooperation through three primary revenue sources: cost savings from self-produced and consumed energy, surplus energy sales, and government incentives. We identify the combination of these factors that leads to a cooperative Nash equilibrium, where the dominant strategy for prosumers is to create a REC with passive consumers.</div><div>We further include bargaining in our model to explain how revenues are distributed between prosumers and passive consumers. Our results indicate that profit-sharing dynamics are influenced by factors such as self-consumption subsidies, energy pricing, and energy storage technology. Finally, we identify key policy parameters that influence REC viability, demonstrating that well-calibrated government incentives can significantly enhance participation and cooperation. Our study fills a gap in the literature by offering a formal strategic model that explains both the coordination mechanisms enabling successful REC formation and the bargaining processes that determine revenue distribution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001213\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Renewable energy communities and the ecological transition: A game theoretic bargaining approach
Renewable energy communities (RECs) are considered a key initiative for ecological transition by international institutions and policymakers. In our article, we analyze how RECs enhance cooperation in ecological transition with a game-theoretic approach. Depending on specific conditions, the interaction among RECs members can be modeled through a Prisoner’s Dilemma or a game where cooperation is the only equilibrium. A REC creates incentives for cooperation through three primary revenue sources: cost savings from self-produced and consumed energy, surplus energy sales, and government incentives. We identify the combination of these factors that leads to a cooperative Nash equilibrium, where the dominant strategy for prosumers is to create a REC with passive consumers.
We further include bargaining in our model to explain how revenues are distributed between prosumers and passive consumers. Our results indicate that profit-sharing dynamics are influenced by factors such as self-consumption subsidies, energy pricing, and energy storage technology. Finally, we identify key policy parameters that influence REC viability, demonstrating that well-calibrated government incentives can significantly enhance participation and cooperation. Our study fills a gap in the literature by offering a formal strategic model that explains both the coordination mechanisms enabling successful REC formation and the bargaining processes that determine revenue distribution.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.