空中楼阁:重新审视全球甲烷承诺

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jinling Guo , Junlian Gao , Kejia Yan , Bo Zhang , He Liu
{"title":"空中楼阁:重新审视全球甲烷承诺","authors":"Jinling Guo ,&nbsp;Junlian Gao ,&nbsp;Kejia Yan ,&nbsp;Bo Zhang ,&nbsp;He Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The entry into force of the Global Methane Pledge (GMP) signifies a pivotal shift in climate governance, elevating methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) mitigation from a peripheral concern to a central global priority. While the GMP has significantly raised global ambition regarding CH<sub>4</sub> reduction, the growing number of participations has yet to close the gap between pledges and actual implementation. This discrepancy arises from interrelated challenges related to the strength of mitigation commitments, data accuracy, regulatory scope, and technological readiness. A review of CH<sub>4</sub> emissions inventories from 160 participants reveals that 77% lacked a 2020 baseline inventory, and the credibility of official data in several developed countries has also come under scrutiny. Most participants—including the European Union and the United States—have emphasized exploratory frameworks and policy rather than adopting concrete, quantitative reduction targets. Overall, CH<sub>4</sub> mitigation efforts remain in an early development phase. Their future effectiveness will hinge on progress in four key areas: stronger mitigation commitments, enhanced data transparency, more comprehensive regulatory structures, and the deployment of innovative technologies. These findings underscore the urgent need for both participants and non-participants to strengthen international cooperation and activate untapped mitigation potential. Elevating CH<sub>4</sub> reduction to a prominent position on the COP30 agenda and establishing a more binding framework for action will be crucial in the years ahead.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 114785"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Castles in the Sky: Revisiting the global methane pledge\",\"authors\":\"Jinling Guo ,&nbsp;Junlian Gao ,&nbsp;Kejia Yan ,&nbsp;Bo Zhang ,&nbsp;He Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The entry into force of the Global Methane Pledge (GMP) signifies a pivotal shift in climate governance, elevating methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) mitigation from a peripheral concern to a central global priority. While the GMP has significantly raised global ambition regarding CH<sub>4</sub> reduction, the growing number of participations has yet to close the gap between pledges and actual implementation. This discrepancy arises from interrelated challenges related to the strength of mitigation commitments, data accuracy, regulatory scope, and technological readiness. A review of CH<sub>4</sub> emissions inventories from 160 participants reveals that 77% lacked a 2020 baseline inventory, and the credibility of official data in several developed countries has also come under scrutiny. Most participants—including the European Union and the United States—have emphasized exploratory frameworks and policy rather than adopting concrete, quantitative reduction targets. Overall, CH<sub>4</sub> mitigation efforts remain in an early development phase. Their future effectiveness will hinge on progress in four key areas: stronger mitigation commitments, enhanced data transparency, more comprehensive regulatory structures, and the deployment of innovative technologies. These findings underscore the urgent need for both participants and non-participants to strengthen international cooperation and activate untapped mitigation potential. Elevating CH<sub>4</sub> reduction to a prominent position on the COP30 agenda and establishing a more binding framework for action will be crucial in the years ahead.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"206 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002927\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球甲烷承诺(GMP)的生效标志着气候治理的关键转变,将甲烷(CH4)减排从外围问题提升为全球的核心优先事项。虽然GMP大大提高了全球减少甲烷的雄心,但越来越多的参与者尚未缩小承诺与实际执行之间的差距。这种差异源于与缓解承诺力度、数据准确性、监管范围和技术准备程度有关的相互关联的挑战。对160个参与者的甲烷排放清单的审查显示,77%的参与者缺乏2020年基线清单,几个发达国家官方数据的可信度也受到了审查。大多数参与者——包括欧盟和美国——都强调探索性框架和政策,而不是采取具体的、量化的减排目标。总体而言,减缓甲烷的努力仍处于早期发展阶段。它们未来的有效性将取决于四个关键领域的进展:更强有力的缓解承诺、提高数据透明度、更全面的监管结构和创新技术的部署。这些调查结果强调,参与者和非参与者都迫切需要加强国际合作,激活尚未开发的缓解潜力。在未来几年中,将减少甲烷排放提升到COP30议程的突出位置并建立更具约束力的行动框架将至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Castles in the Sky: Revisiting the global methane pledge
The entry into force of the Global Methane Pledge (GMP) signifies a pivotal shift in climate governance, elevating methane (CH4) mitigation from a peripheral concern to a central global priority. While the GMP has significantly raised global ambition regarding CH4 reduction, the growing number of participations has yet to close the gap between pledges and actual implementation. This discrepancy arises from interrelated challenges related to the strength of mitigation commitments, data accuracy, regulatory scope, and technological readiness. A review of CH4 emissions inventories from 160 participants reveals that 77% lacked a 2020 baseline inventory, and the credibility of official data in several developed countries has also come under scrutiny. Most participants—including the European Union and the United States—have emphasized exploratory frameworks and policy rather than adopting concrete, quantitative reduction targets. Overall, CH4 mitigation efforts remain in an early development phase. Their future effectiveness will hinge on progress in four key areas: stronger mitigation commitments, enhanced data transparency, more comprehensive regulatory structures, and the deployment of innovative technologies. These findings underscore the urgent need for both participants and non-participants to strengthen international cooperation and activate untapped mitigation potential. Elevating CH4 reduction to a prominent position on the COP30 agenda and establishing a more binding framework for action will be crucial in the years ahead.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信