坦桑尼亚中学数学大班教学与评估策略:系统回顾

Honorata Kihaga , Bettina Dahl , Septimi Kitta , Morwo Likinjiye
{"title":"坦桑尼亚中学数学大班教学与评估策略:系统回顾","authors":"Honorata Kihaga ,&nbsp;Bettina Dahl ,&nbsp;Septimi Kitta ,&nbsp;Morwo Likinjiye","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores strategies for teaching and assessing students in large mathematics classes in secondary schools. Specifically, the study answers the following questions: “What are the recommended strategies for teaching large mathematics classes? And what are the recommended strategies for assessing students’ learning in large mathematics classes?” The study employed a systematic literature review approach whereby 40 documents were retrieved from various databases and analysed using thematic analysis with the help of MAXQDA software. The findings reveal that group discussion, peer instruction, think-pair-share, participatory lecture, question and answer, problem-based learning, team teaching, projects, flipped classroom, inquiry-based teaching, and jigsaw methods are recommended for teaching students in large classes. The most recommended strategy is teaching by combining more than one teaching strategy, such as lecture combined with discussion, lecture combined with questions and answers, think-pair-share combined with group discussion or problem-based learning combined with a case study. Regarding assessment, the literature recommends the use of group assignments, short examinations, oral assessment, pair assessment activities, portfolios, question-response sessions and short quizzes or tests. Additionally, peer grading and peer or audio feedback are highly encouraged to minimise the marking load. The study recommends an interventional study to determine whether teaching by combining lecture with discussion or lecture with think-pair-share and similar strategies could yield positive results on students’ engagement and, hence, academic achievement in a large class context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 101744"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for teaching and assessing students in large mathematics classes in secondary schools in Tanzania: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Honorata Kihaga ,&nbsp;Bettina Dahl ,&nbsp;Septimi Kitta ,&nbsp;Morwo Likinjiye\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores strategies for teaching and assessing students in large mathematics classes in secondary schools. Specifically, the study answers the following questions: “What are the recommended strategies for teaching large mathematics classes? And what are the recommended strategies for assessing students’ learning in large mathematics classes?” The study employed a systematic literature review approach whereby 40 documents were retrieved from various databases and analysed using thematic analysis with the help of MAXQDA software. The findings reveal that group discussion, peer instruction, think-pair-share, participatory lecture, question and answer, problem-based learning, team teaching, projects, flipped classroom, inquiry-based teaching, and jigsaw methods are recommended for teaching students in large classes. The most recommended strategy is teaching by combining more than one teaching strategy, such as lecture combined with discussion, lecture combined with questions and answers, think-pair-share combined with group discussion or problem-based learning combined with a case study. Regarding assessment, the literature recommends the use of group assignments, short examinations, oral assessment, pair assessment activities, portfolios, question-response sessions and short quizzes or tests. Additionally, peer grading and peer or audio feedback are highly encouraged to minimise the marking load. The study recommends an interventional study to determine whether teaching by combining lecture with discussion or lecture with think-pair-share and similar strategies could yield positive results on students’ engagement and, hence, academic achievement in a large class context.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social sciences & humanities open\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101744\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social sciences & humanities open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125004723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125004723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨中学数学大班教学与评量策略。具体来说,该研究回答了以下问题:“推荐的大型数学课教学策略是什么?在大型数学课上评估学生学习情况的推荐策略是什么?”本研究采用系统文献综述法,从不同数据库中检索40篇文献,并借助MAXQDA软件进行专题分析。研究结果显示,小组讨论、同伴指导、思考-结对分享、参与式讲座、问答、基于问题的学习、团队教学、项目、翻转课堂、探究式教学和拼图方法被推荐用于大班教学。最推荐的策略是将多种教学策略结合起来进行教学,例如讲座与讨论相结合,讲座与问答相结合,思考-配对-分享与小组讨论相结合,或者基于问题的学习与案例研究相结合。关于评估,文献建议使用小组作业、简短考试、口头评估、结对评估活动、作品集、问答环节和简短测验或测试。此外,我们强烈鼓励同学评分和同学或音频反馈,以尽量减少评分负担。该研究建议进行一项介入性研究,以确定授课与讨论或授课与思考-配对-分享及类似策略相结合的教学方式是否能对学生的参与度产生积极影响,从而在大班环境中提高学业成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies for teaching and assessing students in large mathematics classes in secondary schools in Tanzania: A systematic review
This study explores strategies for teaching and assessing students in large mathematics classes in secondary schools. Specifically, the study answers the following questions: “What are the recommended strategies for teaching large mathematics classes? And what are the recommended strategies for assessing students’ learning in large mathematics classes?” The study employed a systematic literature review approach whereby 40 documents were retrieved from various databases and analysed using thematic analysis with the help of MAXQDA software. The findings reveal that group discussion, peer instruction, think-pair-share, participatory lecture, question and answer, problem-based learning, team teaching, projects, flipped classroom, inquiry-based teaching, and jigsaw methods are recommended for teaching students in large classes. The most recommended strategy is teaching by combining more than one teaching strategy, such as lecture combined with discussion, lecture combined with questions and answers, think-pair-share combined with group discussion or problem-based learning combined with a case study. Regarding assessment, the literature recommends the use of group assignments, short examinations, oral assessment, pair assessment activities, portfolios, question-response sessions and short quizzes or tests. Additionally, peer grading and peer or audio feedback are highly encouraged to minimise the marking load. The study recommends an interventional study to determine whether teaching by combining lecture with discussion or lecture with think-pair-share and similar strategies could yield positive results on students’ engagement and, hence, academic achievement in a large class context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social sciences & humanities open
Social sciences & humanities open Psychology (General), Decision Sciences (General), Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
159 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信