利用激光雷达点云和无人机系统的RGB图像进行开棉铃检测

IF 4.5 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Zhe Lin , Wenxuan Guo , Nathan S. Gill , Glen Ritchie , Brendan Kelly , Xiao-Peng Song
{"title":"利用激光雷达点云和无人机系统的RGB图像进行开棉铃检测","authors":"Zhe Lin ,&nbsp;Wenxuan Guo ,&nbsp;Nathan S. Gill ,&nbsp;Glen Ritchie ,&nbsp;Brendan Kelly ,&nbsp;Xiao-Peng Song","doi":"10.1016/j.cpb.2025.100519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate quantification of open bolls and their distribution is crucial for understanding cotton growth, development, and yield in optimized crop management and enhanced plant breeding. Manual boll counting methods are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and subjective. Leveraging the potential of high-resolution images for high-throughput phenotyping offers a promising avenue for efficient trait quantification. The objectives of this study were to develop methods to detect and count open cotton bolls using LiDAR point cloud and RGB images and to compare the effectiveness of these two data sources.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A DJI Phantom 4 RTK Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) equipped with a 4 K RGB camera was used to acquire high-resolution RGB images, and a DJI Matrice 300 RTK with a Zenmuse L1 sensor was used to acquire LiDAR point cloud data. The RGB images were converted to point cloud using photogrammetry by measuring multiple points of overlapping images. The boll detection workflow involved data filtering and clustering using the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) method. Evaluation of the methods involved 48 plots representing small, medium, and large plant sizes using metrics including mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (r²).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The methods using both data sources performed well in estimating open bolls, with LiDAR point cloud data slightly outperforming those derived from RGB images. Generally, the performance of the DBSCAN method in boll detection improved with decreasing plant sizes. Specifically, LiDAR data yielded MAPE values of 5.03 %, 8.05 %, and 13.46 %, RMSE values of 7.26, 14.33, and 23.40 bolls per m², and r<sup>2</sup> values of 0.93, 0.84, and 0.84 for small, medium, and large plant sizes, respectively. RGB image-based data exhibited MAPE values of 7.21 %, 6.49 %, and 16.41 %, RMSE values of 11.05, 13.66, and 26.49 bolls per m², and r<sup>2</sup> values of 0.82, 0.74, and 0.83 for small, medium, and large plant sizes, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The method demonstrates the potential of RGB imagery and LiDAR data for estimating boll counts, offering valuable tools for enhanced plant phenotyping in plant breeding and site-specific crop management. Both data sources underestimated boll counts, with smaller plants showing less undercounting, likely due to improved light penetration and separation of bolls. These findings highlight the influence of plant structure on boll detection accuracy and the need to address challenges posed by dense canopies to enhance detection reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38090,"journal":{"name":"Current Plant Biology","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100519"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open cotton boll detection using LiDAR point clouds and RGB images from unmanned aerial systems\",\"authors\":\"Zhe Lin ,&nbsp;Wenxuan Guo ,&nbsp;Nathan S. Gill ,&nbsp;Glen Ritchie ,&nbsp;Brendan Kelly ,&nbsp;Xiao-Peng Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpb.2025.100519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate quantification of open bolls and their distribution is crucial for understanding cotton growth, development, and yield in optimized crop management and enhanced plant breeding. Manual boll counting methods are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and subjective. Leveraging the potential of high-resolution images for high-throughput phenotyping offers a promising avenue for efficient trait quantification. The objectives of this study were to develop methods to detect and count open cotton bolls using LiDAR point cloud and RGB images and to compare the effectiveness of these two data sources.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A DJI Phantom 4 RTK Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) equipped with a 4 K RGB camera was used to acquire high-resolution RGB images, and a DJI Matrice 300 RTK with a Zenmuse L1 sensor was used to acquire LiDAR point cloud data. The RGB images were converted to point cloud using photogrammetry by measuring multiple points of overlapping images. The boll detection workflow involved data filtering and clustering using the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) method. Evaluation of the methods involved 48 plots representing small, medium, and large plant sizes using metrics including mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (r²).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The methods using both data sources performed well in estimating open bolls, with LiDAR point cloud data slightly outperforming those derived from RGB images. Generally, the performance of the DBSCAN method in boll detection improved with decreasing plant sizes. Specifically, LiDAR data yielded MAPE values of 5.03 %, 8.05 %, and 13.46 %, RMSE values of 7.26, 14.33, and 23.40 bolls per m², and r<sup>2</sup> values of 0.93, 0.84, and 0.84 for small, medium, and large plant sizes, respectively. RGB image-based data exhibited MAPE values of 7.21 %, 6.49 %, and 16.41 %, RMSE values of 11.05, 13.66, and 26.49 bolls per m², and r<sup>2</sup> values of 0.82, 0.74, and 0.83 for small, medium, and large plant sizes, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The method demonstrates the potential of RGB imagery and LiDAR data for estimating boll counts, offering valuable tools for enhanced plant phenotyping in plant breeding and site-specific crop management. Both data sources underestimated boll counts, with smaller plants showing less undercounting, likely due to improved light penetration and separation of bolls. These findings highlight the influence of plant structure on boll detection accuracy and the need to address challenges posed by dense canopies to enhance detection reliability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Plant Biology\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Plant Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214662825000878\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Plant Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214662825000878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确量化开铃及其分布对了解棉花的生长发育和产量、优化作物管理和提高育种水平具有重要意义。人工计数法耗时、费力、主观。利用高分辨率图像的潜力进行高通量表型分析,为有效的性状量化提供了一条有前途的途径。本研究的目的是开发利用激光雷达点云和RGB图像检测和计数开放棉铃的方法,并比较这两种数据源的有效性。方法采用搭载4 K RGB相机的大疆Phantom 4 RTK无人机系统(UAS)获取高分辨率RGB图像,采用搭载Zenmuse L1传感器的大疆matrix 300 RTK获取LiDAR点云数据。采用摄影测量法,通过测量重叠图像的多个点,将RGB图像转换为点云。棉铃检测工作流程包括使用基于密度的空间聚类(DBSCAN)方法对数据进行过滤和聚类。采用平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和决定系数(r²)等指标对48个代表小型、中型和大型植物规模的地块进行了方法评估。结果使用两种数据源的方法在估计开铃方面表现良好,激光雷达点云数据略优于RGB图像。一般来说,DBSCAN方法在棉铃检测中的性能随着株型的减小而提高。具体来说,激光雷达数据得出的MAPE值分别为5.03 %、8.05 %和13.46 %,RMSE值分别为7.26、14.33和23.40铃/ m²,r2值分别为0.93、0.84和0.84。基于RGB图像的数据显示,小、中、大株型的MAPE值分别为7.21 %、6.49 %和16.41 %,RMSE值分别为11.05、13.66和26.49铃/ m²,r2值分别为0.82、0.74和0.83。结论该方法显示了RGB图像和激光雷达数据在估计铃数方面的潜力,为植物育种和特定地点作物管理提供了有价值的工具。这两个数据来源都低估了铃数,较小的植株显示较少的铃数,可能是由于改善了光穿透和铃的分离。这些发现强调了植物结构对棉铃检测精度的影响,以及解决密集冠层带来的挑战以提高检测可靠性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open cotton boll detection using LiDAR point clouds and RGB images from unmanned aerial systems

Background

Accurate quantification of open bolls and their distribution is crucial for understanding cotton growth, development, and yield in optimized crop management and enhanced plant breeding. Manual boll counting methods are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and subjective. Leveraging the potential of high-resolution images for high-throughput phenotyping offers a promising avenue for efficient trait quantification. The objectives of this study were to develop methods to detect and count open cotton bolls using LiDAR point cloud and RGB images and to compare the effectiveness of these two data sources.

Methods

A DJI Phantom 4 RTK Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) equipped with a 4 K RGB camera was used to acquire high-resolution RGB images, and a DJI Matrice 300 RTK with a Zenmuse L1 sensor was used to acquire LiDAR point cloud data. The RGB images were converted to point cloud using photogrammetry by measuring multiple points of overlapping images. The boll detection workflow involved data filtering and clustering using the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) method. Evaluation of the methods involved 48 plots representing small, medium, and large plant sizes using metrics including mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (r²).

Results

The methods using both data sources performed well in estimating open bolls, with LiDAR point cloud data slightly outperforming those derived from RGB images. Generally, the performance of the DBSCAN method in boll detection improved with decreasing plant sizes. Specifically, LiDAR data yielded MAPE values of 5.03 %, 8.05 %, and 13.46 %, RMSE values of 7.26, 14.33, and 23.40 bolls per m², and r2 values of 0.93, 0.84, and 0.84 for small, medium, and large plant sizes, respectively. RGB image-based data exhibited MAPE values of 7.21 %, 6.49 %, and 16.41 %, RMSE values of 11.05, 13.66, and 26.49 bolls per m², and r2 values of 0.82, 0.74, and 0.83 for small, medium, and large plant sizes, respectively.

Conclusions

The method demonstrates the potential of RGB imagery and LiDAR data for estimating boll counts, offering valuable tools for enhanced plant phenotyping in plant breeding and site-specific crop management. Both data sources underestimated boll counts, with smaller plants showing less undercounting, likely due to improved light penetration and separation of bolls. These findings highlight the influence of plant structure on boll detection accuracy and the need to address challenges posed by dense canopies to enhance detection reliability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Plant Biology
Current Plant Biology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
32
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Current Plant Biology aims to acknowledge and encourage interdisciplinary research in fundamental plant sciences with scope to address crop improvement, biodiversity, nutrition and human health. It publishes review articles, original research papers, method papers and short articles in plant research fields, such as systems biology, cell biology, genetics, epigenetics, mathematical modeling, signal transduction, plant-microbe interactions, synthetic biology, developmental biology, biochemistry, molecular biology, physiology, biotechnologies, bioinformatics and plant genomic resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信