Ben Abdelouahab Nouhaila , Olivier Jean-Christophe , Bourguet Salvy , Auvity Bruno
{"title":"优化远程海上应用的氢系统:综合分析","authors":"Ben Abdelouahab Nouhaila , Olivier Jean-Christophe , Bourguet Salvy , Auvity Bruno","doi":"10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Large-scale energy storage is one of the major challenges facing the energy transition. Hydrogen is considered to be a promising solution. This paper proposes a decision-support tool for optimizing hydrogen system sizing in offshore applications. A techno-economic model of the hydrogen production and storage chain is proposed. A hybridization with batteries is considered to smooth the intermittences, and the energy management is done using a separation frequency method. The feasibility of using a battery as buffer storage is evaluated from both technical and economic perspectives. A bi-objective optimization using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) is conducted to minimize the annual cost while maximizing hydrogen production. Optimization Results show that the lowest Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) of 11.26 €/kgH<sub>2</sub>, is obtained without battery storage using an electrolyzer size close to the maximum power capacity of the renewable source. In this configuration, electricity cost accounts for 48% of the LCOH, electrolyzer CAPEX 24%, tank 22%, and compressor 6%. Although batteries are traditionally expected to smooth intermittent power and improve system efficiency, the optimization results reveal that their integration offers no economic benefit. The presented techno economic analysis of the optimal solutions describes how the hydrogen system sizing affects the LCOH, the hydrogen production, and other performance indicators. A sensitive analysis is investigated to assess the influence of key technical and economic parameters on the optimization outcomes. The result demonstrates that LCOH is mainly driven by electricity cost and electrolyzer CAPEX. Overall, the optimal sizing showed a consistent robustness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37131,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 101146"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing hydrogen systems for far offshore applications: a comprehensive analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ben Abdelouahab Nouhaila , Olivier Jean-Christophe , Bourguet Salvy , Auvity Bruno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Large-scale energy storage is one of the major challenges facing the energy transition. Hydrogen is considered to be a promising solution. This paper proposes a decision-support tool for optimizing hydrogen system sizing in offshore applications. A techno-economic model of the hydrogen production and storage chain is proposed. A hybridization with batteries is considered to smooth the intermittences, and the energy management is done using a separation frequency method. The feasibility of using a battery as buffer storage is evaluated from both technical and economic perspectives. A bi-objective optimization using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) is conducted to minimize the annual cost while maximizing hydrogen production. Optimization Results show that the lowest Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) of 11.26 €/kgH<sub>2</sub>, is obtained without battery storage using an electrolyzer size close to the maximum power capacity of the renewable source. In this configuration, electricity cost accounts for 48% of the LCOH, electrolyzer CAPEX 24%, tank 22%, and compressor 6%. Although batteries are traditionally expected to smooth intermittent power and improve system efficiency, the optimization results reveal that their integration offers no economic benefit. The presented techno economic analysis of the optimal solutions describes how the hydrogen system sizing affects the LCOH, the hydrogen production, and other performance indicators. A sensitive analysis is investigated to assess the influence of key technical and economic parameters on the optimization outcomes. The result demonstrates that LCOH is mainly driven by electricity cost and electrolyzer CAPEX. Overall, the optimal sizing showed a consistent robustness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management-X\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management-X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174525002788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174525002788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing hydrogen systems for far offshore applications: a comprehensive analysis
Large-scale energy storage is one of the major challenges facing the energy transition. Hydrogen is considered to be a promising solution. This paper proposes a decision-support tool for optimizing hydrogen system sizing in offshore applications. A techno-economic model of the hydrogen production and storage chain is proposed. A hybridization with batteries is considered to smooth the intermittences, and the energy management is done using a separation frequency method. The feasibility of using a battery as buffer storage is evaluated from both technical and economic perspectives. A bi-objective optimization using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) is conducted to minimize the annual cost while maximizing hydrogen production. Optimization Results show that the lowest Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) of 11.26 €/kgH2, is obtained without battery storage using an electrolyzer size close to the maximum power capacity of the renewable source. In this configuration, electricity cost accounts for 48% of the LCOH, electrolyzer CAPEX 24%, tank 22%, and compressor 6%. Although batteries are traditionally expected to smooth intermittent power and improve system efficiency, the optimization results reveal that their integration offers no economic benefit. The presented techno economic analysis of the optimal solutions describes how the hydrogen system sizing affects the LCOH, the hydrogen production, and other performance indicators. A sensitive analysis is investigated to assess the influence of key technical and economic parameters on the optimization outcomes. The result demonstrates that LCOH is mainly driven by electricity cost and electrolyzer CAPEX. Overall, the optimal sizing showed a consistent robustness.
期刊介绍:
Energy Conversion and Management: X is the open access extension of the reputable journal Energy Conversion and Management, serving as a platform for interdisciplinary research on a wide array of critical energy subjects. The journal is dedicated to publishing original contributions and in-depth technical review articles that present groundbreaking research on topics spanning energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management, and sustainability.
The scope of Energy Conversion and Management: X encompasses various forms of energy, including mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic, and electric energy. It addresses all known energy resources, highlighting both conventional sources like fossil fuels and nuclear power, as well as renewable resources such as solar, biomass, hydro, wind, geothermal, and ocean energy.