孤独感、社会孤立和偶发性抑郁症的关系:基于英国生物银行的前瞻性研究

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Li-Peng Wan , Zhen-Yu Zhao , Bao-Peng Liu , Jia-Hui Zhu , Cun-Xian Jia , Xin-Ting Wang
{"title":"孤独感、社会孤立和偶发性抑郁症的关系:基于英国生物银行的前瞻性研究","authors":"Li-Peng Wan ,&nbsp;Zhen-Yu Zhao ,&nbsp;Bao-Peng Liu ,&nbsp;Jia-Hui Zhu ,&nbsp;Cun-Xian Jia ,&nbsp;Xin-Ting Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>In existing research on social isolation and loneliness, although both are widely recognized as independent risk factors for health, their interrelationship has not been fully explored. Therefore, clarifying whether there is an interaction between them is crucial to understanding their impact on an individual's health.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Loneliness and social isolation were assessed by means of touch-screen questionnaire. The occurrence of clinically diagnosed depression was determined based on the section of mental and behavioral disorders of the UKB's first occurrence fields. Cox proportional hazard models and additive and multiplicative models were used to assess the associations between loneliness, social isolation, and incident depression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 339,051 participants, 48.47 % were men and 13,096 depression cases were recorded during a median follow-up period of 12.45 years. Loneliness (yes vs no: adjusted HR: 1.77; 95 % CI: 1.67–1.89) and social isolation (yes vs no: adjusted HR: 1.14; 95 % CI: 1.08–1.21) were associated with an increased risk of incident depression. The association between increased risk of depression and social isolation was modified by gender (<em>P</em><sub>interaction</sub> = 0.018). The interactive effect of loneliness and social isolation was not statistically associated with incident depression (<em>P</em> = 0.124).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Loneliness and social isolation were independently associated with a higher risk of incident depression, with no interaction between the two.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"96 ","pages":"Pages 171-177"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between loneliness, social isolation and incident depression: a prospective study based on UK Biobank\",\"authors\":\"Li-Peng Wan ,&nbsp;Zhen-Yu Zhao ,&nbsp;Bao-Peng Liu ,&nbsp;Jia-Hui Zhu ,&nbsp;Cun-Xian Jia ,&nbsp;Xin-Ting Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.07.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>In existing research on social isolation and loneliness, although both are widely recognized as independent risk factors for health, their interrelationship has not been fully explored. Therefore, clarifying whether there is an interaction between them is crucial to understanding their impact on an individual's health.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Loneliness and social isolation were assessed by means of touch-screen questionnaire. The occurrence of clinically diagnosed depression was determined based on the section of mental and behavioral disorders of the UKB's first occurrence fields. Cox proportional hazard models and additive and multiplicative models were used to assess the associations between loneliness, social isolation, and incident depression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 339,051 participants, 48.47 % were men and 13,096 depression cases were recorded during a median follow-up period of 12.45 years. Loneliness (yes vs no: adjusted HR: 1.77; 95 % CI: 1.67–1.89) and social isolation (yes vs no: adjusted HR: 1.14; 95 % CI: 1.08–1.21) were associated with an increased risk of incident depression. The association between increased risk of depression and social isolation was modified by gender (<em>P</em><sub>interaction</sub> = 0.018). The interactive effect of loneliness and social isolation was not statistically associated with incident depression (<em>P</em> = 0.124).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Loneliness and social isolation were independently associated with a higher risk of incident depression, with no interaction between the two.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 171-177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325001434\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325001434","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在现有的社会隔离和孤独研究中,虽然两者都被广泛认为是健康的独立危险因素,但它们之间的相互关系尚未得到充分探讨。因此,弄清两者之间是否存在相互作用对于了解它们对个人健康的影响至关重要。方法采用触屏问卷法对患者进行孤独感和社会隔离评价。临床诊断抑郁症的发生是根据UKB首发场的精神和行为障碍部分来确定的。使用Cox比例风险模型和加性和乘性模型来评估孤独、社会隔离和事件性抑郁之间的关系。结果在339,051名参与者中,48.47%为男性,在中位随访12.45年期间记录了13,096例抑郁症病例。孤独(是vs否:调整后HR: 1.77;95% CI: 1.67-1.89)和社会隔离(是vs否:调整后的HR: 1.14;95% CI: 1.08-1.21)与抑郁症发生率增加相关。抑郁风险增加与社会孤立之间的关联受性别影响(p交互作用= 0.018)。孤独感和社会隔离的交互效应与抑郁事件无统计学相关性(P = 0.124)。结论孤独感和社会隔离与抑郁症发生风险独立相关,两者之间无交互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between loneliness, social isolation and incident depression: a prospective study based on UK Biobank

Purpose

In existing research on social isolation and loneliness, although both are widely recognized as independent risk factors for health, their interrelationship has not been fully explored. Therefore, clarifying whether there is an interaction between them is crucial to understanding their impact on an individual's health.

Methods

Loneliness and social isolation were assessed by means of touch-screen questionnaire. The occurrence of clinically diagnosed depression was determined based on the section of mental and behavioral disorders of the UKB's first occurrence fields. Cox proportional hazard models and additive and multiplicative models were used to assess the associations between loneliness, social isolation, and incident depression.

Results

Among the 339,051 participants, 48.47 % were men and 13,096 depression cases were recorded during a median follow-up period of 12.45 years. Loneliness (yes vs no: adjusted HR: 1.77; 95 % CI: 1.67–1.89) and social isolation (yes vs no: adjusted HR: 1.14; 95 % CI: 1.08–1.21) were associated with an increased risk of incident depression. The association between increased risk of depression and social isolation was modified by gender (Pinteraction = 0.018). The interactive effect of loneliness and social isolation was not statistically associated with incident depression (P = 0.124).

Conclusions

Loneliness and social isolation were independently associated with a higher risk of incident depression, with no interaction between the two.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信