{"title":"德国北海地区的绿色-绿色困境:海上电力- x技术接受度的q -方法论研究","authors":"Laura Schmidt, Paul Bowyer","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green hydrogen and other power-to-X-products (PtX) have gained significance worldwide in the context of transitioning to a low-carbon society. The offshore production of such products is considered to have major potential. While major financial investments advance the technological development, questions relating to social acceptance receive scant attention. From comparable technological innovations it is known that a lack of acceptance among actors may hinder their implementation. Using the German North Sea coast as a case study, we seek to understand the aspects shaping acceptance of offshore PtX-technology among different actor groups e.g. from fisheries, nature conservation, or tourism. We conducted interviews applying Q-methodology, where interview partners were asked to sort pre-formulated statements addressing different acceptance factors indicating their degree of agreement. Results show that none of the interview partners question the need for PtX and the potential of offshore wind energy. However, we identified two groups of actors with different positions, strongly characterised by the ‘green-green’-dilemma. One group is more concerned with the environmental impacts of PtX-technology, challenging the growth paradigm, while the second group sees it as a necessity to combat climate change, and a chance for economic development in coastal regions. Our results show that the acceptance of renewable energies is less linked to the technology itself, but rather to the underlying worldviews, narratives and visions of a coastal future. Revealing and understanding these underlying values leading to polarized views, is a valuable first step for mutual understanding on a shared matter of concern.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104211"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green-green-dilemma in the German North Sea region: A Q-methodology study of the acceptance of offshore power-to-X technologies\",\"authors\":\"Laura Schmidt, Paul Bowyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Green hydrogen and other power-to-X-products (PtX) have gained significance worldwide in the context of transitioning to a low-carbon society. The offshore production of such products is considered to have major potential. While major financial investments advance the technological development, questions relating to social acceptance receive scant attention. From comparable technological innovations it is known that a lack of acceptance among actors may hinder their implementation. Using the German North Sea coast as a case study, we seek to understand the aspects shaping acceptance of offshore PtX-technology among different actor groups e.g. from fisheries, nature conservation, or tourism. We conducted interviews applying Q-methodology, where interview partners were asked to sort pre-formulated statements addressing different acceptance factors indicating their degree of agreement. Results show that none of the interview partners question the need for PtX and the potential of offshore wind energy. However, we identified two groups of actors with different positions, strongly characterised by the ‘green-green’-dilemma. One group is more concerned with the environmental impacts of PtX-technology, challenging the growth paradigm, while the second group sees it as a necessity to combat climate change, and a chance for economic development in coastal regions. Our results show that the acceptance of renewable energies is less linked to the technology itself, but rather to the underlying worldviews, narratives and visions of a coastal future. Revealing and understanding these underlying values leading to polarized views, is a valuable first step for mutual understanding on a shared matter of concern.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002920\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002920","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Green-green-dilemma in the German North Sea region: A Q-methodology study of the acceptance of offshore power-to-X technologies
Green hydrogen and other power-to-X-products (PtX) have gained significance worldwide in the context of transitioning to a low-carbon society. The offshore production of such products is considered to have major potential. While major financial investments advance the technological development, questions relating to social acceptance receive scant attention. From comparable technological innovations it is known that a lack of acceptance among actors may hinder their implementation. Using the German North Sea coast as a case study, we seek to understand the aspects shaping acceptance of offshore PtX-technology among different actor groups e.g. from fisheries, nature conservation, or tourism. We conducted interviews applying Q-methodology, where interview partners were asked to sort pre-formulated statements addressing different acceptance factors indicating their degree of agreement. Results show that none of the interview partners question the need for PtX and the potential of offshore wind energy. However, we identified two groups of actors with different positions, strongly characterised by the ‘green-green’-dilemma. One group is more concerned with the environmental impacts of PtX-technology, challenging the growth paradigm, while the second group sees it as a necessity to combat climate change, and a chance for economic development in coastal regions. Our results show that the acceptance of renewable energies is less linked to the technology itself, but rather to the underlying worldviews, narratives and visions of a coastal future. Revealing and understanding these underlying values leading to polarized views, is a valuable first step for mutual understanding on a shared matter of concern.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.