德国北海地区的绿色-绿色困境:海上电力- x技术接受度的q -方法论研究

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Laura Schmidt, Paul Bowyer
{"title":"德国北海地区的绿色-绿色困境:海上电力- x技术接受度的q -方法论研究","authors":"Laura Schmidt,&nbsp;Paul Bowyer","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green hydrogen and other power-to-X-products (PtX) have gained significance worldwide in the context of transitioning to a low-carbon society. The offshore production of such products is considered to have major potential. While major financial investments advance the technological development, questions relating to social acceptance receive scant attention. From comparable technological innovations it is known that a lack of acceptance among actors may hinder their implementation. Using the German North Sea coast as a case study, we seek to understand the aspects shaping acceptance of offshore PtX-technology among different actor groups e.g. from fisheries, nature conservation, or tourism. We conducted interviews applying Q-methodology, where interview partners were asked to sort pre-formulated statements addressing different acceptance factors indicating their degree of agreement. Results show that none of the interview partners question the need for PtX and the potential of offshore wind energy. However, we identified two groups of actors with different positions, strongly characterised by the ‘green-green’-dilemma. One group is more concerned with the environmental impacts of PtX-technology, challenging the growth paradigm, while the second group sees it as a necessity to combat climate change, and a chance for economic development in coastal regions. Our results show that the acceptance of renewable energies is less linked to the technology itself, but rather to the underlying worldviews, narratives and visions of a coastal future. Revealing and understanding these underlying values leading to polarized views, is a valuable first step for mutual understanding on a shared matter of concern.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104211"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green-green-dilemma in the German North Sea region: A Q-methodology study of the acceptance of offshore power-to-X technologies\",\"authors\":\"Laura Schmidt,&nbsp;Paul Bowyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Green hydrogen and other power-to-X-products (PtX) have gained significance worldwide in the context of transitioning to a low-carbon society. The offshore production of such products is considered to have major potential. While major financial investments advance the technological development, questions relating to social acceptance receive scant attention. From comparable technological innovations it is known that a lack of acceptance among actors may hinder their implementation. Using the German North Sea coast as a case study, we seek to understand the aspects shaping acceptance of offshore PtX-technology among different actor groups e.g. from fisheries, nature conservation, or tourism. We conducted interviews applying Q-methodology, where interview partners were asked to sort pre-formulated statements addressing different acceptance factors indicating their degree of agreement. Results show that none of the interview partners question the need for PtX and the potential of offshore wind energy. However, we identified two groups of actors with different positions, strongly characterised by the ‘green-green’-dilemma. One group is more concerned with the environmental impacts of PtX-technology, challenging the growth paradigm, while the second group sees it as a necessity to combat climate change, and a chance for economic development in coastal regions. Our results show that the acceptance of renewable energies is less linked to the technology itself, but rather to the underlying worldviews, narratives and visions of a coastal future. Revealing and understanding these underlying values leading to polarized views, is a valuable first step for mutual understanding on a shared matter of concern.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002920\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002920","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在向低碳社会转型的背景下,绿色氢和其他电力到x产品(PtX)在全球范围内具有重要意义。这些产品的海上生产被认为具有很大的潜力。虽然主要的金融投资推动了技术的发展,但与社会接受度有关的问题却很少受到关注。从可比的技术创新中可以知道,行动者之间缺乏接受可能会阻碍其实施。以德国北海海岸为例,我们试图了解不同参与者群体(如渔业、自然保护或旅游业)对海上ptx技术接受程度的影响。我们运用q -方法论进行了访谈,在访谈中,访谈伙伴被要求对预先制定的陈述进行分类,以解决不同的接受因素,表明他们的同意程度。结果表明,没有一个访谈伙伴质疑PtX的需求和海上风能的潜力。然而,我们确定了两组立场不同的参与者,他们的特点是“绿-绿”困境。一组人更关注ptx技术对环境的影响,挑战增长模式,而另一组人则认为它是应对气候变化的必要条件,也是沿海地区经济发展的机会。我们的研究结果表明,接受可再生能源与技术本身的关系不大,而是与潜在的世界观、叙事和对沿海未来的愿景有关。揭示和理解这些导致观点两极分化的潜在价值,是在共同关心的问题上相互理解的有价值的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green-green-dilemma in the German North Sea region: A Q-methodology study of the acceptance of offshore power-to-X technologies
Green hydrogen and other power-to-X-products (PtX) have gained significance worldwide in the context of transitioning to a low-carbon society. The offshore production of such products is considered to have major potential. While major financial investments advance the technological development, questions relating to social acceptance receive scant attention. From comparable technological innovations it is known that a lack of acceptance among actors may hinder their implementation. Using the German North Sea coast as a case study, we seek to understand the aspects shaping acceptance of offshore PtX-technology among different actor groups e.g. from fisheries, nature conservation, or tourism. We conducted interviews applying Q-methodology, where interview partners were asked to sort pre-formulated statements addressing different acceptance factors indicating their degree of agreement. Results show that none of the interview partners question the need for PtX and the potential of offshore wind energy. However, we identified two groups of actors with different positions, strongly characterised by the ‘green-green’-dilemma. One group is more concerned with the environmental impacts of PtX-technology, challenging the growth paradigm, while the second group sees it as a necessity to combat climate change, and a chance for economic development in coastal regions. Our results show that the acceptance of renewable energies is less linked to the technology itself, but rather to the underlying worldviews, narratives and visions of a coastal future. Revealing and understanding these underlying values leading to polarized views, is a valuable first step for mutual understanding on a shared matter of concern.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信