你会在一个歧视用户的平台上购物吗?算法价格歧视对消费者购买意愿的影响研究

IF 8.3 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Jintao Lu , Yezhuo Zhang , Eunil Park , Malin Song
{"title":"你会在一个歧视用户的平台上购物吗?算法价格歧视对消费者购买意愿的影响研究","authors":"Jintao Lu ,&nbsp;Yezhuo Zhang ,&nbsp;Eunil Park ,&nbsp;Malin Song","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2025.102306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The immoral use of algorithms by platform companies has damaged to consumer rights, yet some consumers continue to spend money on platforms that discriminate against users. The existing literature does not fully understand consumers’ complete motivations for using platforms that engage in algorithmic price discrimination. To explore the intrinsic mechanism and boundary conditions of the impact of platform algorithmic price discrimination on consumer purchase intention, 494 consumers who have used online shopping in the last year in China from January 2024 to May 2024 were selected to participate in a multi-time point survey. Based on the integration perspective of the rational choice theory and the expectancy violation theory, from the perspective of the moral reasoning process and boundary conditions, the mediating mechanism between algorithmic price discrimination and consumer purchase intention was examined. Results show that algorithmic price discrimination harms consumer purchase intention; moral decoupling mediates the relationship between algorithmic price discrimination and consumer purchase intention; Competence trust and goodwill trust have significant moderating effects between algorithmic price discrimination and moral decoupling. The conclusions obtained from this study not only reveal the mechanism through which algorithmic price discrimination affects consumer purchase intention, and provide important strategic insights into how platform regulators can safeguard consumer rights, and how platform managers can effectively remedy the negative impact caused by the issue of algorithmic price discrimination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102306"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Would you shop on a platform that discriminates against users? A study on the impact of algorithmic price discrimination on consumer purchase intention\",\"authors\":\"Jintao Lu ,&nbsp;Yezhuo Zhang ,&nbsp;Eunil Park ,&nbsp;Malin Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tele.2025.102306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The immoral use of algorithms by platform companies has damaged to consumer rights, yet some consumers continue to spend money on platforms that discriminate against users. The existing literature does not fully understand consumers’ complete motivations for using platforms that engage in algorithmic price discrimination. To explore the intrinsic mechanism and boundary conditions of the impact of platform algorithmic price discrimination on consumer purchase intention, 494 consumers who have used online shopping in the last year in China from January 2024 to May 2024 were selected to participate in a multi-time point survey. Based on the integration perspective of the rational choice theory and the expectancy violation theory, from the perspective of the moral reasoning process and boundary conditions, the mediating mechanism between algorithmic price discrimination and consumer purchase intention was examined. Results show that algorithmic price discrimination harms consumer purchase intention; moral decoupling mediates the relationship between algorithmic price discrimination and consumer purchase intention; Competence trust and goodwill trust have significant moderating effects between algorithmic price discrimination and moral decoupling. The conclusions obtained from this study not only reveal the mechanism through which algorithmic price discrimination affects consumer purchase intention, and provide important strategic insights into how platform regulators can safeguard consumer rights, and how platform managers can effectively remedy the negative impact caused by the issue of algorithmic price discrimination.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585325000681\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585325000681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

平台公司对算法的不道德使用损害了消费者的权利,但一些消费者继续在歧视用户的平台上花钱。现有文献并没有完全理解消费者使用涉及算法价格歧视的平台的完整动机。为了探究平台算法价格歧视对消费者购买意愿影响的内在机制和边界条件,我们选取了在2024年1月至2024年5月期间在中国最近一年使用过网购的494名消费者进行了多时间点调查。基于理性选择理论与期望违背理论的整合视角,从道德推理过程和边界条件的角度考察了算法价格歧视对消费者购买意愿的中介机制。结果表明:算法价格歧视损害了消费者的购买意愿;道德解耦在算法价格歧视与消费者购买意愿之间起中介作用;能力信任和商誉信任在算法价格歧视和道德脱钩之间具有显著的调节作用。本研究得出的结论不仅揭示了算法价格歧视影响消费者购买意愿的机制,而且为平台监管机构如何维护消费者权益、平台管理者如何有效弥补算法价格歧视问题带来的负面影响提供了重要的战略见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Would you shop on a platform that discriminates against users? A study on the impact of algorithmic price discrimination on consumer purchase intention
The immoral use of algorithms by platform companies has damaged to consumer rights, yet some consumers continue to spend money on platforms that discriminate against users. The existing literature does not fully understand consumers’ complete motivations for using platforms that engage in algorithmic price discrimination. To explore the intrinsic mechanism and boundary conditions of the impact of platform algorithmic price discrimination on consumer purchase intention, 494 consumers who have used online shopping in the last year in China from January 2024 to May 2024 were selected to participate in a multi-time point survey. Based on the integration perspective of the rational choice theory and the expectancy violation theory, from the perspective of the moral reasoning process and boundary conditions, the mediating mechanism between algorithmic price discrimination and consumer purchase intention was examined. Results show that algorithmic price discrimination harms consumer purchase intention; moral decoupling mediates the relationship between algorithmic price discrimination and consumer purchase intention; Competence trust and goodwill trust have significant moderating effects between algorithmic price discrimination and moral decoupling. The conclusions obtained from this study not only reveal the mechanism through which algorithmic price discrimination affects consumer purchase intention, and provide important strategic insights into how platform regulators can safeguard consumer rights, and how platform managers can effectively remedy the negative impact caused by the issue of algorithmic price discrimination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信