{"title":"特征协同增强检测,但不能从纹理线索识别形状","authors":"Cordula Hunt-Radej, Anna-Lena Schubert, Günter Meinhardt","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2025.108660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Texture regions that differ from their surroundings in more than one local feature are more easily detected. Recent findings show that a low-level summary statistic, net contrast energy, predicts this double-cue advantage, suggesting early-stage integration during image analysis. We investigated whether this advantage also applies to more complex, texture-defined shape discrimination beyond figure-ground segregation. Using both a figure detection task and a more demanding shape identification task, we calibrated <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>′</mo></mrow></msup></math></span> sensitivity to fixed baseline levels with single-cue targets defined by orientation or spatial frequency contrast. We then measured performance for double-cue targets at these baselines. Contrary to earlier results reported for simpler shape discriminations, we found a reduced double-cue advantage in the shape identification task. Specifically, double-cue sensitivity was notably lower than the algebraic sum of the single-cue sensitivities, a level achieved consistently in the detection task. Control tests with high feature contrast showed perfect detection performance for both single and combined cues. However, shape identification saturated at levels between <span><math><mrow><mn>83</mn><mtext>%–</mtext><mn>90</mn><mtext>%</mtext></mrow></math></span> accuracy, while gray-shaded figures yielded perfect performance, suggesting that unique shape representations could not be built from single or combined texture cues. These findings suggest that texture cue summation enhances texture segregation and segmentation but does not improve higher-level recognition of 2D texture shapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 108660"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feature synergy enhances detection but not recognition of shape from texture cues\",\"authors\":\"Cordula Hunt-Radej, Anna-Lena Schubert, Günter Meinhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.visres.2025.108660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Texture regions that differ from their surroundings in more than one local feature are more easily detected. Recent findings show that a low-level summary statistic, net contrast energy, predicts this double-cue advantage, suggesting early-stage integration during image analysis. We investigated whether this advantage also applies to more complex, texture-defined shape discrimination beyond figure-ground segregation. Using both a figure detection task and a more demanding shape identification task, we calibrated <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>′</mo></mrow></msup></math></span> sensitivity to fixed baseline levels with single-cue targets defined by orientation or spatial frequency contrast. We then measured performance for double-cue targets at these baselines. Contrary to earlier results reported for simpler shape discriminations, we found a reduced double-cue advantage in the shape identification task. Specifically, double-cue sensitivity was notably lower than the algebraic sum of the single-cue sensitivities, a level achieved consistently in the detection task. Control tests with high feature contrast showed perfect detection performance for both single and combined cues. However, shape identification saturated at levels between <span><math><mrow><mn>83</mn><mtext>%–</mtext><mn>90</mn><mtext>%</mtext></mrow></math></span> accuracy, while gray-shaded figures yielded perfect performance, suggesting that unique shape representations could not be built from single or combined texture cues. These findings suggest that texture cue summation enhances texture segregation and segmentation but does not improve higher-level recognition of 2D texture shapes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"235 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108660\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004269892500121X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004269892500121X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feature synergy enhances detection but not recognition of shape from texture cues
Texture regions that differ from their surroundings in more than one local feature are more easily detected. Recent findings show that a low-level summary statistic, net contrast energy, predicts this double-cue advantage, suggesting early-stage integration during image analysis. We investigated whether this advantage also applies to more complex, texture-defined shape discrimination beyond figure-ground segregation. Using both a figure detection task and a more demanding shape identification task, we calibrated sensitivity to fixed baseline levels with single-cue targets defined by orientation or spatial frequency contrast. We then measured performance for double-cue targets at these baselines. Contrary to earlier results reported for simpler shape discriminations, we found a reduced double-cue advantage in the shape identification task. Specifically, double-cue sensitivity was notably lower than the algebraic sum of the single-cue sensitivities, a level achieved consistently in the detection task. Control tests with high feature contrast showed perfect detection performance for both single and combined cues. However, shape identification saturated at levels between accuracy, while gray-shaded figures yielded perfect performance, suggesting that unique shape representations could not be built from single or combined texture cues. These findings suggest that texture cue summation enhances texture segregation and segmentation but does not improve higher-level recognition of 2D texture shapes.
期刊介绍:
Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.