{"title":"验证悲痛信心工具的跨专业死亡通知教育","authors":"Adrienne Galbraith MSN, RN, CHSE , Elizabeth Roe PhD, RN , Suzan Kardong-Edgren PhD, RN, ANEF, CHSE, FSSH, FAAN","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Healthcare professionals lack training in death notification, highlighting a need for education to build confidence. To measure impact, the GRIEV_ING Self-Efficacy Survey, originally for medical residents, was adapted for nursing and social work students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Content validity was assessed using Lawshe’s method. Nine experts rated ten items in Round 1. Revised items were evaluated by sixteen experts in Round 2.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Round 1 CVI was 0.87, with five of ten items retained. Round 2 CVI was 0.75, with seven items retained.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The modified instrument was validated to assess confidence in death notification and support simulation-based education for nursing and social work students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101784"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating the GRIEV_ING confidence instrument for interprofessional death notification education\",\"authors\":\"Adrienne Galbraith MSN, RN, CHSE , Elizabeth Roe PhD, RN , Suzan Kardong-Edgren PhD, RN, ANEF, CHSE, FSSH, FAAN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Healthcare professionals lack training in death notification, highlighting a need for education to build confidence. To measure impact, the GRIEV_ING Self-Efficacy Survey, originally for medical residents, was adapted for nursing and social work students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Content validity was assessed using Lawshe’s method. Nine experts rated ten items in Round 1. Revised items were evaluated by sixteen experts in Round 2.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Round 1 CVI was 0.87, with five of ten items retained. Round 2 CVI was 0.75, with seven items retained.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The modified instrument was validated to assess confidence in death notification and support simulation-based education for nursing and social work students.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187613992500101X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187613992500101X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validating the GRIEV_ING confidence instrument for interprofessional death notification education
Background
Healthcare professionals lack training in death notification, highlighting a need for education to build confidence. To measure impact, the GRIEV_ING Self-Efficacy Survey, originally for medical residents, was adapted for nursing and social work students.
Methods
Content validity was assessed using Lawshe’s method. Nine experts rated ten items in Round 1. Revised items were evaluated by sixteen experts in Round 2.
Results
Round 1 CVI was 0.87, with five of ten items retained. Round 2 CVI was 0.75, with seven items retained.
Conclusion
The modified instrument was validated to assess confidence in death notification and support simulation-based education for nursing and social work students.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation.
We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria:
Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation
Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation
Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation
Leadership for simulation
Simulation operations
Clinical and academic uses of simulation.