超越所有权:探索泰国新兴市场的共享经济平台

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Patcharapar Rojanakit , Rui Torres de Oliveira , Uwe Dulleck
{"title":"超越所有权:探索泰国新兴市场的共享经济平台","authors":"Patcharapar Rojanakit ,&nbsp;Rui Torres de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Uwe Dulleck","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the global rise of sharing economy platforms (SEPs), their success in emerging economies remains inconsistent—largely due to institutional voids and the lack of adaptive business models, leaving these platforms particularly vulnerable to external pressures. This study examines the institutional logics influencing SEP development in emerging economies, with Thailand as a case study. Through qualitative analysis, we identify a range of institutional forces and theorize their dynamic influence with platform development. The key insight of our study is the development of a novel integrated interactive sharing economy platform framework that reveals how these external forces act as both enablers and constraints, and how platforms can strategically leverage internal resources and capabilities to balance and contain these pressures. Our findings highlight the critical role of institutional logics in shaping platform outcomes and offer foundational guidance for future research, platform strategy, and policymaking in underexplored institutional contexts, particularly in emerging economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article e00556"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond ownership: Exploring the sharing economy platforms in Thailand’s emerging market\",\"authors\":\"Patcharapar Rojanakit ,&nbsp;Rui Torres de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Uwe Dulleck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the global rise of sharing economy platforms (SEPs), their success in emerging economies remains inconsistent—largely due to institutional voids and the lack of adaptive business models, leaving these platforms particularly vulnerable to external pressures. This study examines the institutional logics influencing SEP development in emerging economies, with Thailand as a case study. Through qualitative analysis, we identify a range of institutional forces and theorize their dynamic influence with platform development. The key insight of our study is the development of a novel integrated interactive sharing economy platform framework that reveals how these external forces act as both enablers and constraints, and how platforms can strategically leverage internal resources and capabilities to balance and contain these pressures. Our findings highlight the critical role of institutional logics in shaping platform outcomes and offer foundational guidance for future research, platform strategy, and policymaking in underexplored institutional contexts, particularly in emerging economies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Insights\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673425000435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673425000435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管共享经济平台(sep)在全球崛起,但它们在新兴经济体的成功仍然不一致——主要是由于制度空白和缺乏适应性商业模式,使这些平台特别容易受到外部压力的影响。本研究以泰国为个案,探讨影响新兴经济体SEP发展的制度逻辑。通过定性分析,我们确定了一系列制度力量,并将其与平台发展的动态影响理论化。我们研究的关键观点是开发一种新型的集成交互式共享经济平台框架,揭示这些外部力量是如何作为推动因素和制约因素的,以及平台如何战略性地利用内部资源和能力来平衡和遏制这些压力。我们的研究结果强调了制度逻辑在形成平台结果方面的关键作用,并为在未充分探索的制度背景下,特别是在新兴经济体中,未来的研究、平台战略和政策制定提供了基础指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond ownership: Exploring the sharing economy platforms in Thailand’s emerging market
Despite the global rise of sharing economy platforms (SEPs), their success in emerging economies remains inconsistent—largely due to institutional voids and the lack of adaptive business models, leaving these platforms particularly vulnerable to external pressures. This study examines the institutional logics influencing SEP development in emerging economies, with Thailand as a case study. Through qualitative analysis, we identify a range of institutional forces and theorize their dynamic influence with platform development. The key insight of our study is the development of a novel integrated interactive sharing economy platform framework that reveals how these external forces act as both enablers and constraints, and how platforms can strategically leverage internal resources and capabilities to balance and contain these pressures. Our findings highlight the critical role of institutional logics in shaping platform outcomes and offer foundational guidance for future research, platform strategy, and policymaking in underexplored institutional contexts, particularly in emerging economies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Journal of Business Venturing Insights Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
28 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信