AA1100铝合金搅拌摩擦焊中筒子刀与一步双作用刀的对比分析

Q1 Engineering
Yudha Eko Widyantono , Yoshihiko Uematsu , Ilhamdi , Sulardjaka , Jos Istiyanto , Muizuddin Azka , Nurul Muhayat , Triyono
{"title":"AA1100铝合金搅拌摩擦焊中筒子刀与一步双作用刀的对比分析","authors":"Yudha Eko Widyantono ,&nbsp;Yoshihiko Uematsu ,&nbsp;Ilhamdi ,&nbsp;Sulardjaka ,&nbsp;Jos Istiyanto ,&nbsp;Muizuddin Azka ,&nbsp;Nurul Muhayat ,&nbsp;Triyono","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlmm.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aluminum's lightweight nature and corrosion resistance make it a preferred material across various industries, including marine, automotive, railway, and aerospace sectors. However, traditional fusion welding of aluminum often leads to significant defects such as porosity and distortion. Friction Stir Welding (FSW), a solid-state welding technique, addresses many of these challenges but has limitations when welding thick plates, which can be alleviated through the use of a bobbin tool. This study presents a comparative analysis of a novel one-step double-acting tool, which operates dual tools simultaneously on both surfaces of the workpiece, against the bobbin tool. Aluminum AA1100 sheets measuring 200 × 240 mm and 8 mm thick were welded using both methods under standardized parameters: a tool rotation speed of 1500 rpm, a plunge depth of 0.2 mm, a travel speed of 25 mm/min, and a tilt angle of 2°. By varying the offset of the one-step double-acting tool between 0 mm and 2 mm, the impact on bead appearance and mechanical properties was assessed. Results indicated that the bobbin tool produced rougher beads and tear defects due to its design, while the one-step double-acting tool, particularly at a 2 mm offset, yielded cleaner, more uniform welds with fewer defects and enhanced material control. Microstructural analysis showed that the stir zone exhibited uniform grain refinement, and the Heat-Affected Zone (HAZ) benefited from finer grain structures due to improved heat management. Hardness testing revealed a characteristic W-shaped distribution, and tensile strength evaluations demonstrated the superior joint quality of the 2 mm offset, outperforming the bobbin tool in tensile strength and defect reduction. Although the bobbin tool showed slightly higher average strength in bending tests, the one-step double-acting tool proved to be more consistent and reliable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52306,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 577-594"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of bobbin tool and one-step double-acting tool in friction stir welding of aluminum AA1100\",\"authors\":\"Yudha Eko Widyantono ,&nbsp;Yoshihiko Uematsu ,&nbsp;Ilhamdi ,&nbsp;Sulardjaka ,&nbsp;Jos Istiyanto ,&nbsp;Muizuddin Azka ,&nbsp;Nurul Muhayat ,&nbsp;Triyono\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijlmm.2025.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Aluminum's lightweight nature and corrosion resistance make it a preferred material across various industries, including marine, automotive, railway, and aerospace sectors. However, traditional fusion welding of aluminum often leads to significant defects such as porosity and distortion. Friction Stir Welding (FSW), a solid-state welding technique, addresses many of these challenges but has limitations when welding thick plates, which can be alleviated through the use of a bobbin tool. This study presents a comparative analysis of a novel one-step double-acting tool, which operates dual tools simultaneously on both surfaces of the workpiece, against the bobbin tool. Aluminum AA1100 sheets measuring 200 × 240 mm and 8 mm thick were welded using both methods under standardized parameters: a tool rotation speed of 1500 rpm, a plunge depth of 0.2 mm, a travel speed of 25 mm/min, and a tilt angle of 2°. By varying the offset of the one-step double-acting tool between 0 mm and 2 mm, the impact on bead appearance and mechanical properties was assessed. Results indicated that the bobbin tool produced rougher beads and tear defects due to its design, while the one-step double-acting tool, particularly at a 2 mm offset, yielded cleaner, more uniform welds with fewer defects and enhanced material control. Microstructural analysis showed that the stir zone exhibited uniform grain refinement, and the Heat-Affected Zone (HAZ) benefited from finer grain structures due to improved heat management. Hardness testing revealed a characteristic W-shaped distribution, and tensile strength evaluations demonstrated the superior joint quality of the 2 mm offset, outperforming the bobbin tool in tensile strength and defect reduction. Although the bobbin tool showed slightly higher average strength in bending tests, the one-step double-acting tool proved to be more consistent and reliable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 577-594\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840425000411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840425000411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

铝的轻质特性和耐腐蚀性使其成为各种行业的首选材料,包括船舶,汽车,铁路和航空航天部门。然而,传统的铝熔焊常常导致气孔和变形等严重缺陷。搅拌摩擦焊(FSW)是一种固态焊接技术,它解决了许多这些挑战,但在焊接厚板时存在局限性,这可以通过使用线轴工具来缓解。本研究提出了一种新型的一步双作用刀具的比较分析,该刀具在工件的两个表面上同时操作两个刀具,对筒管刀具。焊接尺寸为200 × 240 mm,厚度为8 mm的AA1100铝板,焊接时采用两种焊接方法,焊接参数为:刀具转速1500转/分,插入深度0.2 mm,移动速度25 mm/min,倾斜角度2°。通过改变一步双作用工具的偏移量在0 mm和2 mm之间,评估了对头外观和机械性能的影响。结果表明,由于其设计,筒管工具产生了更粗糙的珠子和撕裂缺陷,而一步双作用工具,特别是在2mm偏移处,产生了更清洁,更均匀的焊缝,缺陷更少,并加强了材料控制。显微组织分析表明,搅拌区晶粒细化均匀,热影响区由于热管理的改善晶粒细化而受益。硬度测试显示出典型的w形分布,抗拉强度评估表明2mm偏移的接头质量更好,在抗拉强度和减少缺陷方面优于线轴工具。虽然在弯曲测试中,筒管工具的平均强度略高,但单步双作用工具的一致性和可靠性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of bobbin tool and one-step double-acting tool in friction stir welding of aluminum AA1100
Aluminum's lightweight nature and corrosion resistance make it a preferred material across various industries, including marine, automotive, railway, and aerospace sectors. However, traditional fusion welding of aluminum often leads to significant defects such as porosity and distortion. Friction Stir Welding (FSW), a solid-state welding technique, addresses many of these challenges but has limitations when welding thick plates, which can be alleviated through the use of a bobbin tool. This study presents a comparative analysis of a novel one-step double-acting tool, which operates dual tools simultaneously on both surfaces of the workpiece, against the bobbin tool. Aluminum AA1100 sheets measuring 200 × 240 mm and 8 mm thick were welded using both methods under standardized parameters: a tool rotation speed of 1500 rpm, a plunge depth of 0.2 mm, a travel speed of 25 mm/min, and a tilt angle of 2°. By varying the offset of the one-step double-acting tool between 0 mm and 2 mm, the impact on bead appearance and mechanical properties was assessed. Results indicated that the bobbin tool produced rougher beads and tear defects due to its design, while the one-step double-acting tool, particularly at a 2 mm offset, yielded cleaner, more uniform welds with fewer defects and enhanced material control. Microstructural analysis showed that the stir zone exhibited uniform grain refinement, and the Heat-Affected Zone (HAZ) benefited from finer grain structures due to improved heat management. Hardness testing revealed a characteristic W-shaped distribution, and tensile strength evaluations demonstrated the superior joint quality of the 2 mm offset, outperforming the bobbin tool in tensile strength and defect reduction. Although the bobbin tool showed slightly higher average strength in bending tests, the one-step double-acting tool proved to be more consistent and reliable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture
International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信