环境税、环境政策的严格性和政策的互补性:欧盟经济和环境目标的综合分析

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Muhammad Usman , Alexandra Horobet , Magdalena Radulescu , Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente
{"title":"环境税、环境政策的严格性和政策的互补性:欧盟经济和环境目标的综合分析","authors":"Muhammad Usman ,&nbsp;Alexandra Horobet ,&nbsp;Magdalena Radulescu ,&nbsp;Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2025.104358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Triple dividend is an important concept which connects socio-economic targets, such as economic growth and employment, with ambitious environmental targets for achieving sustainable development. In this framework, this paper investigates the efficiency of using monetary and fiscal tools for supporting economic growth and reducing unemployment and greenhouse gas (GHG) in the European Union based on 1995–2022 data. The results of the Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MMQR) analysis show that financial development, trade openness and environmental policy stringency reduce unemployment, promote economic growth, and protect environmental goals. In comparison, inflation is not efficient for fighting against unemployment increases and is not significant for achieving a robust economic growth rate. Total environmental, energy and transport taxes are efficient only for reducing unemployment and increasing gross domestic product (GDP) growth. However, at a high level of environmental taxation, GDP decreases. Total environmental taxes are not efficient for reducing GHGs on a solid basis. The results suggest that neither fiscal instruments, such as environmental taxation, nor monetary policy tools, such as interest rate adjustments, are independently sufficient to achieve the environmental, economic, and employment objectives outlined in the triple dividend theory, highlighting the need for a more integrated and comprehensive policy approach. In contrast, strict environmental regulations, along with well-developed financial systems and robust international trade performance have proven more effective. Therefore, policymakers should prioritize these three areas to promote long-term sustainable development within the EU region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 104358"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental taxes, environmental policy stringency and policy complementarity: A comprehensive analysis of EU economic and environmental goals\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Usman ,&nbsp;Alexandra Horobet ,&nbsp;Magdalena Radulescu ,&nbsp;Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iref.2025.104358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Triple dividend is an important concept which connects socio-economic targets, such as economic growth and employment, with ambitious environmental targets for achieving sustainable development. In this framework, this paper investigates the efficiency of using monetary and fiscal tools for supporting economic growth and reducing unemployment and greenhouse gas (GHG) in the European Union based on 1995–2022 data. The results of the Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MMQR) analysis show that financial development, trade openness and environmental policy stringency reduce unemployment, promote economic growth, and protect environmental goals. In comparison, inflation is not efficient for fighting against unemployment increases and is not significant for achieving a robust economic growth rate. Total environmental, energy and transport taxes are efficient only for reducing unemployment and increasing gross domestic product (GDP) growth. However, at a high level of environmental taxation, GDP decreases. Total environmental taxes are not efficient for reducing GHGs on a solid basis. The results suggest that neither fiscal instruments, such as environmental taxation, nor monetary policy tools, such as interest rate adjustments, are independently sufficient to achieve the environmental, economic, and employment objectives outlined in the triple dividend theory, highlighting the need for a more integrated and comprehensive policy approach. In contrast, strict environmental regulations, along with well-developed financial systems and robust international trade performance have proven more effective. Therefore, policymakers should prioritize these three areas to promote long-term sustainable development within the EU region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"volume\":\"103 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025005210\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025005210","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

三重红利是一个重要的概念,它将经济增长和就业等社会经济目标与实现可持续发展的雄心勃勃的环境目标联系起来。在此框架下,本文基于1995-2022年的数据,研究了欧盟使用货币和财政工具支持经济增长、减少失业和温室气体(GHG)的效率。矩分位数回归(MMQR)分析结果表明,金融发展、贸易开放和环境政策严格降低了失业率,促进了经济增长,并保护了环境目标。相比之下,通货膨胀在对抗失业率上升方面效率不高,对实现强劲的经济增长率也不重要。总的环境、能源和运输税只有在减少失业和提高国内生产总值(GDP)增长方面才有效。然而,在高水平的环境税收下,GDP会下降。总的环境税在减少温室气体排放的坚实基础上是无效的。结果表明,无论是财政工具,如环境税收,还是货币政策工具,如利率调整,都不足以独立实现三重红利理论中概述的环境、经济和就业目标,这突出了需要一个更加综合和全面的政策方法。相比之下,严格的环境法规、发达的金融体系和强劲的国际贸易表现已被证明更为有效。因此,政策制定者应优先考虑这三个领域,以促进欧盟地区的长期可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental taxes, environmental policy stringency and policy complementarity: A comprehensive analysis of EU economic and environmental goals
Triple dividend is an important concept which connects socio-economic targets, such as economic growth and employment, with ambitious environmental targets for achieving sustainable development. In this framework, this paper investigates the efficiency of using monetary and fiscal tools for supporting economic growth and reducing unemployment and greenhouse gas (GHG) in the European Union based on 1995–2022 data. The results of the Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MMQR) analysis show that financial development, trade openness and environmental policy stringency reduce unemployment, promote economic growth, and protect environmental goals. In comparison, inflation is not efficient for fighting against unemployment increases and is not significant for achieving a robust economic growth rate. Total environmental, energy and transport taxes are efficient only for reducing unemployment and increasing gross domestic product (GDP) growth. However, at a high level of environmental taxation, GDP decreases. Total environmental taxes are not efficient for reducing GHGs on a solid basis. The results suggest that neither fiscal instruments, such as environmental taxation, nor monetary policy tools, such as interest rate adjustments, are independently sufficient to achieve the environmental, economic, and employment objectives outlined in the triple dividend theory, highlighting the need for a more integrated and comprehensive policy approach. In contrast, strict environmental regulations, along with well-developed financial systems and robust international trade performance have proven more effective. Therefore, policymakers should prioritize these three areas to promote long-term sustainable development within the EU region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信