Emma G. Cunningham , Daphné Bavelier , C. Shawn Green
{"title":"通过游戏评估计划:探索使用小游戏来评估计划能力","authors":"Emma G. Cunningham , Daphné Bavelier , C. Shawn Green","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Planning, or the ability to generate, organize, and implement a sequence of steps toward a goal, is essential for success across a wide range of activities, from preparing a meal to developing a software program. Indeed, robust planning abilities have been found to predict math achievement in children and support independent living in older adults. However, common tasks used to measure planning often fail to correlate with one another, suggesting they may not assess the same underlying skill. To explore a novel approach to measuring planning, this study examined performance on four planning mini games, a non-planning control game, and a battery of cognitive tasks measuring related cognitive skills, including three standard planning tasks. As hypothesized, the planning mini games showed stronger intercorrelations than previously shown between traditional tasks, suggesting they may capture a more consistent and unified planning construct. Notably, two of the selected mini games emerged as particularly promising paradigms for assessing planning skills. These findings provide initial evidence that mini games such as those explored here could complement or replace traditional cognitive planning tasks, offering an appropriately complex evaluation of the multifaceted skill of planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 105252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating planning through play: Exploring the use of mini games to assess planning abilities\",\"authors\":\"Emma G. Cunningham , Daphné Bavelier , C. Shawn Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Planning, or the ability to generate, organize, and implement a sequence of steps toward a goal, is essential for success across a wide range of activities, from preparing a meal to developing a software program. Indeed, robust planning abilities have been found to predict math achievement in children and support independent living in older adults. However, common tasks used to measure planning often fail to correlate with one another, suggesting they may not assess the same underlying skill. To explore a novel approach to measuring planning, this study examined performance on four planning mini games, a non-planning control game, and a battery of cognitive tasks measuring related cognitive skills, including three standard planning tasks. As hypothesized, the planning mini games showed stronger intercorrelations than previously shown between traditional tasks, suggesting they may capture a more consistent and unified planning construct. Notably, two of the selected mini games emerged as particularly promising paradigms for assessing planning skills. These findings provide initial evidence that mini games such as those explored here could complement or replace traditional cognitive planning tasks, offering an appropriately complex evaluation of the multifaceted skill of planning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"volume\":\"259 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825005657\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825005657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating planning through play: Exploring the use of mini games to assess planning abilities
Planning, or the ability to generate, organize, and implement a sequence of steps toward a goal, is essential for success across a wide range of activities, from preparing a meal to developing a software program. Indeed, robust planning abilities have been found to predict math achievement in children and support independent living in older adults. However, common tasks used to measure planning often fail to correlate with one another, suggesting they may not assess the same underlying skill. To explore a novel approach to measuring planning, this study examined performance on four planning mini games, a non-planning control game, and a battery of cognitive tasks measuring related cognitive skills, including three standard planning tasks. As hypothesized, the planning mini games showed stronger intercorrelations than previously shown between traditional tasks, suggesting they may capture a more consistent and unified planning construct. Notably, two of the selected mini games emerged as particularly promising paradigms for assessing planning skills. These findings provide initial evidence that mini games such as those explored here could complement or replace traditional cognitive planning tasks, offering an appropriately complex evaluation of the multifaceted skill of planning.
期刊介绍:
Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.