通过游戏评估计划:探索使用小游戏来评估计划能力

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Emma G. Cunningham , Daphné Bavelier , C. Shawn Green
{"title":"通过游戏评估计划:探索使用小游戏来评估计划能力","authors":"Emma G. Cunningham ,&nbsp;Daphné Bavelier ,&nbsp;C. Shawn Green","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Planning, or the ability to generate, organize, and implement a sequence of steps toward a goal, is essential for success across a wide range of activities, from preparing a meal to developing a software program. Indeed, robust planning abilities have been found to predict math achievement in children and support independent living in older adults. However, common tasks used to measure planning often fail to correlate with one another, suggesting they may not assess the same underlying skill. To explore a novel approach to measuring planning, this study examined performance on four planning mini games, a non-planning control game, and a battery of cognitive tasks measuring related cognitive skills, including three standard planning tasks. As hypothesized, the planning mini games showed stronger intercorrelations than previously shown between traditional tasks, suggesting they may capture a more consistent and unified planning construct. Notably, two of the selected mini games emerged as particularly promising paradigms for assessing planning skills. These findings provide initial evidence that mini games such as those explored here could complement or replace traditional cognitive planning tasks, offering an appropriately complex evaluation of the multifaceted skill of planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 105252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating planning through play: Exploring the use of mini games to assess planning abilities\",\"authors\":\"Emma G. Cunningham ,&nbsp;Daphné Bavelier ,&nbsp;C. Shawn Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Planning, or the ability to generate, organize, and implement a sequence of steps toward a goal, is essential for success across a wide range of activities, from preparing a meal to developing a software program. Indeed, robust planning abilities have been found to predict math achievement in children and support independent living in older adults. However, common tasks used to measure planning often fail to correlate with one another, suggesting they may not assess the same underlying skill. To explore a novel approach to measuring planning, this study examined performance on four planning mini games, a non-planning control game, and a battery of cognitive tasks measuring related cognitive skills, including three standard planning tasks. As hypothesized, the planning mini games showed stronger intercorrelations than previously shown between traditional tasks, suggesting they may capture a more consistent and unified planning construct. Notably, two of the selected mini games emerged as particularly promising paradigms for assessing planning skills. These findings provide initial evidence that mini games such as those explored here could complement or replace traditional cognitive planning tasks, offering an appropriately complex evaluation of the multifaceted skill of planning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"volume\":\"259 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825005657\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825005657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从准备一顿饭到开发一个软件程序,计划,或者是产生、组织和实现一个目标的一系列步骤的能力,对于在广泛的活动中取得成功是必不可少的。事实上,人们发现,强大的计划能力可以预测儿童的数学成绩,也可以帮助老年人独立生活。然而,用于衡量计划的常见任务往往无法相互关联,这表明它们可能无法评估相同的潜在技能。为了探索一种测量计划的新方法,本研究考察了四个计划小游戏、一个非计划控制游戏和一系列测量相关认知技能的认知任务的表现,其中包括三个标准计划任务。正如假设的那样,计划小游戏在传统任务之间表现出比之前更强的相互关联,这表明它们可能捕捉到更一致和统一的计划结构。值得注意的是,其中两个迷你游戏成为了评估计划技能的典范。这些发现提供了初步证据,表明迷你游戏可以补充或取代传统的认知计划任务,为规划的多方面技能提供适当的复杂评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating planning through play: Exploring the use of mini games to assess planning abilities
Planning, or the ability to generate, organize, and implement a sequence of steps toward a goal, is essential for success across a wide range of activities, from preparing a meal to developing a software program. Indeed, robust planning abilities have been found to predict math achievement in children and support independent living in older adults. However, common tasks used to measure planning often fail to correlate with one another, suggesting they may not assess the same underlying skill. To explore a novel approach to measuring planning, this study examined performance on four planning mini games, a non-planning control game, and a battery of cognitive tasks measuring related cognitive skills, including three standard planning tasks. As hypothesized, the planning mini games showed stronger intercorrelations than previously shown between traditional tasks, suggesting they may capture a more consistent and unified planning construct. Notably, two of the selected mini games emerged as particularly promising paradigms for assessing planning skills. These findings provide initial evidence that mini games such as those explored here could complement or replace traditional cognitive planning tasks, offering an appropriately complex evaluation of the multifaceted skill of planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信