热带森林蒸腾估算在地理、生态和方法上存在偏差:对树液流研究的系统回顾

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Natalia de Aguiar-Campos, Will Edwards, Susan G.  W. Laurance
{"title":"热带森林蒸腾估算在地理、生态和方法上存在偏差:对树液流研究的系统回顾","authors":"Natalia de Aguiar-Campos,&nbsp;Will Edwards,&nbsp;Susan G.  W. Laurance","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tropical forest transpiration is essential for the maintenance of the water and carbon cycles and regulation of the global climate. However, recent collective efforts to compile sap flow data, which is the most widely used method for quantifying transpiration in woody stems, have revealed a large data gap in the tropics. Furthermore, accurately upscaling point measurements of sap flow to whole-plant water use (PWU) requires data inputs and corrections that may be difficult to determine in highly diverse tropical forests. This systematic review has two main goals: to assess the methodological limitations of PWU research in tropical forests and to highlight geographical and ecological gaps among current tropical forest PWU research. Our Web of Science search used terms related to ‘plant water use’ and ‘tropical forest’ and gathered all peer-reviewed studies that used sap flow sensors and upscaled point measurements to PWU in tropical forests. Based on 72 studies conducted in 85 locations, we found that drier forest types (based on Holdridge life zones) are largely underrepresented in the literature, with more than 75% of the research output concentrated in wetter forest types. We also identified a substantial knowledge gap on liana sap flow, which appeared in less than 6% of the studies. Regarding the methodological limitations, most studies omitted information regarding the number of sensors deployed per plant and the method of zero-flow determination. Other shortcomings specific to each sap flow sensor type are highlighted. Our study underscores the need for standardising key methodological aspects and identifies significant geographical and ecological gaps in tropical forest PWU research. It provides a foundation for further studies to refine estimates of the present and future contributions of tropical forest transpiration to the global water cycle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"373 ","pages":"Article 110738"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tropical forest transpiration estimates are geographically, ecologically and methodologically biased: a systematic review of sap flow research\",\"authors\":\"Natalia de Aguiar-Campos,&nbsp;Will Edwards,&nbsp;Susan G.  W. Laurance\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Tropical forest transpiration is essential for the maintenance of the water and carbon cycles and regulation of the global climate. However, recent collective efforts to compile sap flow data, which is the most widely used method for quantifying transpiration in woody stems, have revealed a large data gap in the tropics. Furthermore, accurately upscaling point measurements of sap flow to whole-plant water use (PWU) requires data inputs and corrections that may be difficult to determine in highly diverse tropical forests. This systematic review has two main goals: to assess the methodological limitations of PWU research in tropical forests and to highlight geographical and ecological gaps among current tropical forest PWU research. Our Web of Science search used terms related to ‘plant water use’ and ‘tropical forest’ and gathered all peer-reviewed studies that used sap flow sensors and upscaled point measurements to PWU in tropical forests. Based on 72 studies conducted in 85 locations, we found that drier forest types (based on Holdridge life zones) are largely underrepresented in the literature, with more than 75% of the research output concentrated in wetter forest types. We also identified a substantial knowledge gap on liana sap flow, which appeared in less than 6% of the studies. Regarding the methodological limitations, most studies omitted information regarding the number of sensors deployed per plant and the method of zero-flow determination. Other shortcomings specific to each sap flow sensor type are highlighted. Our study underscores the need for standardising key methodological aspects and identifies significant geographical and ecological gaps in tropical forest PWU research. It provides a foundation for further studies to refine estimates of the present and future contributions of tropical forest transpiration to the global water cycle.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"373 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325003570\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325003570","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

热带森林蒸腾对维持水和碳循环以及调节全球气候至关重要。然而,最近的集体努力汇编汁液流数据,这是最广泛用于量化木质茎的蒸腾作用的方法,揭示了热带地区的巨大数据缺口。此外,在高度多样化的热带森林中,准确地将树液流的点测量升级为整株水利用(PWU)需要数据输入和修正,这可能难以确定。本系统综述有两个主要目的:评估热带森林PWU研究的方法学局限性,并突出当前热带森林PWU研究的地理和生态差距。我们的Web of Science搜索使用了与“植物用水”和“热带森林”相关的术语,并收集了所有同行评审的研究,这些研究使用了树液流传感器和对热带森林PWU的升级点测量。基于在85个地点进行的72项研究,我们发现干燥森林类型(基于Holdridge生活区)在文献中的代表性很大,超过75%的研究成果集中在潮湿森林类型。我们还确定了藤本植物液流的实质性知识差距,这在不到6%的研究中出现。由于方法学上的限制,大多数研究都忽略了有关每株植物部署的传感器数量和零流量确定方法的信息。强调了每种液流传感器类型特有的其他缺点。我们的研究强调了标准化关键方法方面的必要性,并确定了热带森林PWU研究中重要的地理和生态差距。它为进一步研究提供了基础,以改进对热带森林蒸腾对全球水循环的当前和未来贡献的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tropical forest transpiration estimates are geographically, ecologically and methodologically biased: a systematic review of sap flow research
Tropical forest transpiration is essential for the maintenance of the water and carbon cycles and regulation of the global climate. However, recent collective efforts to compile sap flow data, which is the most widely used method for quantifying transpiration in woody stems, have revealed a large data gap in the tropics. Furthermore, accurately upscaling point measurements of sap flow to whole-plant water use (PWU) requires data inputs and corrections that may be difficult to determine in highly diverse tropical forests. This systematic review has two main goals: to assess the methodological limitations of PWU research in tropical forests and to highlight geographical and ecological gaps among current tropical forest PWU research. Our Web of Science search used terms related to ‘plant water use’ and ‘tropical forest’ and gathered all peer-reviewed studies that used sap flow sensors and upscaled point measurements to PWU in tropical forests. Based on 72 studies conducted in 85 locations, we found that drier forest types (based on Holdridge life zones) are largely underrepresented in the literature, with more than 75% of the research output concentrated in wetter forest types. We also identified a substantial knowledge gap on liana sap flow, which appeared in less than 6% of the studies. Regarding the methodological limitations, most studies omitted information regarding the number of sensors deployed per plant and the method of zero-flow determination. Other shortcomings specific to each sap flow sensor type are highlighted. Our study underscores the need for standardising key methodological aspects and identifies significant geographical and ecological gaps in tropical forest PWU research. It provides a foundation for further studies to refine estimates of the present and future contributions of tropical forest transpiration to the global water cycle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信