全髋关节置换术中深度与中度神经肌肉阻断对术后恢复和免疫功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Veerle Bijkerk,Lotte M C Jacobs,Wim H C Rijnen,Christiaan Keijzer,Michiel C Warlé,Jetze Visser
{"title":"全髋关节置换术中深度与中度神经肌肉阻断对术后恢复和免疫功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Veerle Bijkerk,Lotte M C Jacobs,Wim H C Rijnen,Christiaan Keijzer,Michiel C Warlé,Jetze Visser","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nDeep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) enhances surgical working conditions in laparoscopic surgery. Whether this accounts for nonlaparoscopic surgery is not known. Additionally, the effect on clinical and patient-reported outcomes remains debated. In this study, the effect of deep NMB compared to moderate NMB during total hip arthroplasty (THA) on quality of recovery and postoperative inflammation is investigated.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis single-center randomized controlled blinded trial comprised 100 patients undergoing THA treated with deep NMB (posttetanic count 1-2) or moderate NMB (train-of-four 1-2). Continuous or bolus administration of rocuronium was used. The primary end point was quality of recovery on postoperative day 1 (POD1), measured by the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire. The secondary end points were innate immune function and pain scores on POD1, measured by ex vivo production capacity of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-1β on whole blood stimulation with lipopolysaccharide and postoperative pain as rated by the numeric rating scale.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThere was no difference in QoR-40 score on POD1 (mean difference -4.1, 95% confidence interval -10.9 to 2.8, P = .241). On POD 1, there was no difference in ex vivo production capacity of TNF (moderate NMB median [quartiles] 890 [532-1605] pg/mL, deep NMB 1113 [651-1716] pg/mL, P = .34, Mann-Whitney U test, median difference -125, 95% confidence interval [CI], -440 to 155) and IL-1β (moderate NMB 1148 [545-1970] pg/mL, deep NMB median 1386 [826-1940] pg/mL, P = .36, median difference [MD] -135, 95% CI, -470 to 191) on lipopolysaccharide stimulation. On POD1, there was no statistically significant difference in pain scores at rest (MD 1.10, 99.6% CI, -0.53 to 2.74, P = .049) and on movement (MD 0.94, 99.6% CI, -0.63 to 2.50, P = .080).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nNo evidence was found for a beneficial effect of deep NMB compared to moderate NMB in THA regarding quality of recovery or postoperative inflammation.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade During Total Hip Replacement Surgery on Postoperative Recovery and Immune Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Veerle Bijkerk,Lotte M C Jacobs,Wim H C Rijnen,Christiaan Keijzer,Michiel C Warlé,Jetze Visser\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/ane.0000000000007639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nDeep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) enhances surgical working conditions in laparoscopic surgery. Whether this accounts for nonlaparoscopic surgery is not known. Additionally, the effect on clinical and patient-reported outcomes remains debated. In this study, the effect of deep NMB compared to moderate NMB during total hip arthroplasty (THA) on quality of recovery and postoperative inflammation is investigated.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis single-center randomized controlled blinded trial comprised 100 patients undergoing THA treated with deep NMB (posttetanic count 1-2) or moderate NMB (train-of-four 1-2). Continuous or bolus administration of rocuronium was used. The primary end point was quality of recovery on postoperative day 1 (POD1), measured by the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire. The secondary end points were innate immune function and pain scores on POD1, measured by ex vivo production capacity of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-1β on whole blood stimulation with lipopolysaccharide and postoperative pain as rated by the numeric rating scale.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThere was no difference in QoR-40 score on POD1 (mean difference -4.1, 95% confidence interval -10.9 to 2.8, P = .241). On POD 1, there was no difference in ex vivo production capacity of TNF (moderate NMB median [quartiles] 890 [532-1605] pg/mL, deep NMB 1113 [651-1716] pg/mL, P = .34, Mann-Whitney U test, median difference -125, 95% confidence interval [CI], -440 to 155) and IL-1β (moderate NMB 1148 [545-1970] pg/mL, deep NMB median 1386 [826-1940] pg/mL, P = .36, median difference [MD] -135, 95% CI, -470 to 191) on lipopolysaccharide stimulation. On POD1, there was no statistically significant difference in pain scores at rest (MD 1.10, 99.6% CI, -0.53 to 2.74, P = .049) and on movement (MD 0.94, 99.6% CI, -0.63 to 2.50, P = .080).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nNo evidence was found for a beneficial effect of deep NMB compared to moderate NMB in THA regarding quality of recovery or postoperative inflammation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在腹腔镜手术中,深度神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)改善手术工作条件。这是否能解释非腹腔镜手术尚不清楚。此外,对临床和患者报告结果的影响仍存在争议。在本研究中,研究了全髋关节置换术(THA)中深度NMB与中度NMB对恢复质量和术后炎症的影响。方法该单中心随机对照盲法试验纳入100例接受深度NMB(破伤风后计数1-2)或中度NMB(4组1-2)治疗的THA患者。使用罗库溴铵连续或大剂量给药。主要终点是术后第1天的恢复质量(POD1),通过恢复质量-40 (QoR-40)问卷测量。次要终点是先天性免疫功能和POD1疼痛评分,通过脂多糖刺激全血时肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)和白细胞介素(IL)-1β的体外生产能力和术后疼痛的数值评定量表来衡量。结果两组患者POD1的QoR-40评分差异无统计学意义(平均差异为-4.1,95%可信区间为-10.9 ~ 2.8,P = 0.241)。在POD 1上,在脂多糖刺激下,TNF(中度NMB中位数[四分位数]890 [532-1605]pg/mL,深部NMB中位数[651-1716]1113 [651-1716]pg/mL, P = 0.34, man - whitney U检验,中位数差异-125,95%可信区间[CI], -440至155)和IL-1β(中度NMB 1148 [545-1970] pg/mL,深部NMB中位数1386 [826-1940]pg/mL, P = 0.36,中位数差异[MD] -135, 95% CI, -470至191)的体外生产能力无差异。在POD1上,休息时疼痛评分(MD 1.10, 99.6% CI, -0.53 ~ 2.74, P = 0.049)和运动时疼痛评分(MD 0.94, 99.6% CI, -0.63 ~ 2.50, P = 0.080)差异无统计学意义。结论在THA术后恢复质量和术后炎症方面,没有证据表明深度NMB比中度NMB有更好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade During Total Hip Replacement Surgery on Postoperative Recovery and Immune Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
BACKGROUND Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) enhances surgical working conditions in laparoscopic surgery. Whether this accounts for nonlaparoscopic surgery is not known. Additionally, the effect on clinical and patient-reported outcomes remains debated. In this study, the effect of deep NMB compared to moderate NMB during total hip arthroplasty (THA) on quality of recovery and postoperative inflammation is investigated. METHODS This single-center randomized controlled blinded trial comprised 100 patients undergoing THA treated with deep NMB (posttetanic count 1-2) or moderate NMB (train-of-four 1-2). Continuous or bolus administration of rocuronium was used. The primary end point was quality of recovery on postoperative day 1 (POD1), measured by the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire. The secondary end points were innate immune function and pain scores on POD1, measured by ex vivo production capacity of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-1β on whole blood stimulation with lipopolysaccharide and postoperative pain as rated by the numeric rating scale. RESULTS There was no difference in QoR-40 score on POD1 (mean difference -4.1, 95% confidence interval -10.9 to 2.8, P = .241). On POD 1, there was no difference in ex vivo production capacity of TNF (moderate NMB median [quartiles] 890 [532-1605] pg/mL, deep NMB 1113 [651-1716] pg/mL, P = .34, Mann-Whitney U test, median difference -125, 95% confidence interval [CI], -440 to 155) and IL-1β (moderate NMB 1148 [545-1970] pg/mL, deep NMB median 1386 [826-1940] pg/mL, P = .36, median difference [MD] -135, 95% CI, -470 to 191) on lipopolysaccharide stimulation. On POD1, there was no statistically significant difference in pain scores at rest (MD 1.10, 99.6% CI, -0.53 to 2.74, P = .049) and on movement (MD 0.94, 99.6% CI, -0.63 to 2.50, P = .080). CONCLUSIONS No evidence was found for a beneficial effect of deep NMB compared to moderate NMB in THA regarding quality of recovery or postoperative inflammation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信