Sarah S Jaser, Karishma Datye, James C Slaughter, Lauren LeStourgeon, Randi Streisand
{"title":"THR1VE !:减少青少年1型糖尿病患者糖尿病困扰的随机对照试验。","authors":"Sarah S Jaser, Karishma Datye, James C Slaughter, Lauren LeStourgeon, Randi Streisand","doi":"10.1111/dme.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the effects of a positive psychology intervention to treat diabetes distress (DD) and improve glycaemic outcomes among adolescents with type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adolescents ages 13-17 with elevated DD and their caregivers from 2 sites (n = 198 dyads) were randomized to receive enhanced usual care (Diabetes Education) or a Diabetes Education + Positive Affect intervention, delivered via automated text messages. Psychosocial and glycaemic data were collected at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. The primary outcomes were changes in diabetes distress (DD) and HbA1c over 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adolescents demonstrated high levels of engagement in the trial; overall response to text messages was 91%, and retention was 90% over 12 months. Adolescents in both groups reported reductions in DD from baseline to 12 months (effect size d = 0.40), and they were significantly more likely to move from clinically relevant levels into the normal range of DD than to report increased DD (OR = 2.2, p = 0.002). Adolescents' HbA1c was stable over 12 months. We did not observe significant differences in outcomes between groups. Improvement in DD was associated with decreased HbA1c over time (β = 1.89, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant intervention effect on DD or HbA1c. Adolescents in both the Diabetes Education and Diabetes Education + Positive Affect arms reported reduced DD over 12 months. Future studies are needed to determine how to employ the least burdensome, engaging intervention for distressed adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":520603,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association","volume":" ","pages":"e70107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THR1VE!: Randomized controlled trial to reduce diabetes distress in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah S Jaser, Karishma Datye, James C Slaughter, Lauren LeStourgeon, Randi Streisand\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dme.70107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the effects of a positive psychology intervention to treat diabetes distress (DD) and improve glycaemic outcomes among adolescents with type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adolescents ages 13-17 with elevated DD and their caregivers from 2 sites (n = 198 dyads) were randomized to receive enhanced usual care (Diabetes Education) or a Diabetes Education + Positive Affect intervention, delivered via automated text messages. Psychosocial and glycaemic data were collected at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. The primary outcomes were changes in diabetes distress (DD) and HbA1c over 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adolescents demonstrated high levels of engagement in the trial; overall response to text messages was 91%, and retention was 90% over 12 months. Adolescents in both groups reported reductions in DD from baseline to 12 months (effect size d = 0.40), and they were significantly more likely to move from clinically relevant levels into the normal range of DD than to report increased DD (OR = 2.2, p = 0.002). Adolescents' HbA1c was stable over 12 months. We did not observe significant differences in outcomes between groups. Improvement in DD was associated with decreased HbA1c over time (β = 1.89, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant intervention effect on DD or HbA1c. Adolescents in both the Diabetes Education and Diabetes Education + Positive Affect arms reported reduced DD over 12 months. Future studies are needed to determine how to employ the least burdensome, engaging intervention for distressed adolescents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价积极心理干预对青少年1型糖尿病患者糖尿病困扰(DD)的治疗效果和改善血糖结局的效果。方法:来自2个地点(n = 198对)的13-17岁DD升高的青少年及其照顾者随机接受强化常规护理(糖尿病教育)或糖尿病教育+积极影响干预,通过自动短信传递。在基线、3个月、6个月和12个月时收集社会心理和血糖数据。主要结局是12个月内糖尿病窘迫(DD)和HbA1c的变化。结果:青少年在试验中表现出高水平的参与;短信的总体回复率为91%,12个月的留存率为90%。两组青少年从基线到12个月的DD均有所减少(效应值d = 0.40),并且他们从临床相关水平进入DD正常范围的可能性明显高于报告DD增加的可能性(OR = 2.2, p = 0.002)。青少年HbA1c在12个月内保持稳定。我们没有观察到组间结果的显著差异。随着时间的推移,DD的改善与HbA1c的降低相关(β = 1.89, p = 0.02)。结论:干预对DD和HbA1c无显著影响。糖尿病教育组和糖尿病教育+积极影响组的青少年在12个月内都报告了DD的减少。未来的研究需要确定如何采用负担最少的,参与干预的困扰青少年。
THR1VE!: Randomized controlled trial to reduce diabetes distress in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
Aims: To evaluate the effects of a positive psychology intervention to treat diabetes distress (DD) and improve glycaemic outcomes among adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
Methods: Adolescents ages 13-17 with elevated DD and their caregivers from 2 sites (n = 198 dyads) were randomized to receive enhanced usual care (Diabetes Education) or a Diabetes Education + Positive Affect intervention, delivered via automated text messages. Psychosocial and glycaemic data were collected at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. The primary outcomes were changes in diabetes distress (DD) and HbA1c over 12 months.
Results: Adolescents demonstrated high levels of engagement in the trial; overall response to text messages was 91%, and retention was 90% over 12 months. Adolescents in both groups reported reductions in DD from baseline to 12 months (effect size d = 0.40), and they were significantly more likely to move from clinically relevant levels into the normal range of DD than to report increased DD (OR = 2.2, p = 0.002). Adolescents' HbA1c was stable over 12 months. We did not observe significant differences in outcomes between groups. Improvement in DD was associated with decreased HbA1c over time (β = 1.89, p = 0.02).
Conclusions: There was no significant intervention effect on DD or HbA1c. Adolescents in both the Diabetes Education and Diabetes Education + Positive Affect arms reported reduced DD over 12 months. Future studies are needed to determine how to employ the least burdensome, engaging intervention for distressed adolescents.