添加益生菌可通过调节肠道菌群调节猪的生长性能、粪臭减少和胴体特性。

IF 4.4 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Yung-Tsung Chen, Yu-Ting Sun, Herng-Fu Lee, Yu-Chun Lin, Ming-Ju Chen
{"title":"添加益生菌可通过调节肠道菌群调节猪的生长性能、粪臭减少和胴体特性。","authors":"Yung-Tsung Chen, Yu-Ting Sun, Herng-Fu Lee, Yu-Chun Lin, Ming-Ju Chen","doi":"10.1186/s42523-025-00441-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using probiotics as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoters and reducing odor has received increasing attention in animal science. Despite the extensive investigation into the effects of probiotic administration on swine growth performance and odor reduction by short study durations, the analysis of carcass characteristics and potential mechanistic insights involving gut microbiota and downstream pathways is still few.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 48 crossbred LYD [(Landrace x Yorkshire) x Duroc] piglets (equal numbers of males and females) were randomly assigned to one of four dietary treatments: control (CON), Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens M1 (M1), M1 + Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S20 (SA group) and M1 + S20 + Bacillus subtilis S14 (SAM group). During the nursery phase (4-8 weeks), pigs were pair-housed and monitored for diarrhea. From 8 to 19 weeks of age, pigs were individually housed and fed grower-finisher diets. Growth performance, blood biochemistry, fecal enzyme activity, and odor-related metabolites were assessed at multiple time points. At market weight (~ 110 kg), six pigs per group were slaughtered for carcass and cecal microbiota analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated that administration of the probiotics led to increased body weight and average daily weight gain, particularly notable during the weaning and finishing periods. Additionally, the SA and SAM groups significantly reduced skatole concentration in feces. Furthermore, probiotic supplementation was associated with increased carcass weight, with the SAM group exhibiting significantly higher tenderloin weight than the CON group. Microbiota analysis revealed taxa exhibiting significant differences in abundance among groups, with corresponding LEfSe findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administering Bacillus subtilis S14 and B. amyloliquefaciens S20 (SA group) impacted growth performance, reduced fecal odor, and enhanced pig carcass quality. The identified probiotic strains hold promise as feed additives, offering a potential solution to challenges encountered by the swine industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":72201,"journal":{"name":"Animal microbiome","volume":"7 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probiotic supplementation regulated swine growth performance, fecal odor reduction and carcass characteristics by modulating intestinal microbiome.\",\"authors\":\"Yung-Tsung Chen, Yu-Ting Sun, Herng-Fu Lee, Yu-Chun Lin, Ming-Ju Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42523-025-00441-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using probiotics as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoters and reducing odor has received increasing attention in animal science. Despite the extensive investigation into the effects of probiotic administration on swine growth performance and odor reduction by short study durations, the analysis of carcass characteristics and potential mechanistic insights involving gut microbiota and downstream pathways is still few.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 48 crossbred LYD [(Landrace x Yorkshire) x Duroc] piglets (equal numbers of males and females) were randomly assigned to one of four dietary treatments: control (CON), Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens M1 (M1), M1 + Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S20 (SA group) and M1 + S20 + Bacillus subtilis S14 (SAM group). During the nursery phase (4-8 weeks), pigs were pair-housed and monitored for diarrhea. From 8 to 19 weeks of age, pigs were individually housed and fed grower-finisher diets. Growth performance, blood biochemistry, fecal enzyme activity, and odor-related metabolites were assessed at multiple time points. At market weight (~ 110 kg), six pigs per group were slaughtered for carcass and cecal microbiota analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated that administration of the probiotics led to increased body weight and average daily weight gain, particularly notable during the weaning and finishing periods. Additionally, the SA and SAM groups significantly reduced skatole concentration in feces. Furthermore, probiotic supplementation was associated with increased carcass weight, with the SAM group exhibiting significantly higher tenderloin weight than the CON group. Microbiota analysis revealed taxa exhibiting significant differences in abundance among groups, with corresponding LEfSe findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administering Bacillus subtilis S14 and B. amyloliquefaciens S20 (SA group) impacted growth performance, reduced fecal odor, and enhanced pig carcass quality. The identified probiotic strains hold promise as feed additives, offering a potential solution to challenges encountered by the swine industry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal microbiome\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269218/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal microbiome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-025-00441-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-025-00441-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:利用益生菌替代抗生素生长促进剂和减少气味已越来越受到动物科学的关注。尽管对益生菌对猪生长性能和气味减少的影响进行了广泛的研究,但对胴体特征和涉及肠道微生物群和下游途径的潜在机制的分析仍然很少。方法:选用48头杂交LYD[(长×大)×杜洛克]仔猪(公母数量相同),随机分为对照组(CON)、乳酸菌M1 (M1)、M1 +解淀粉芽孢杆菌S20 (SA组)和M1 + S20 +枯草芽孢杆菌S14 (SAM组)4个饲粮处理。在苗圃期(4-8周),猪成对饲养并监测腹泻情况。从8周龄到19周龄,猪被单独饲养,饲喂生长-育肥猪饲粮。在多个时间点评估生长性能、血液生化、粪便酶活性和气味相关代谢物。在市场体重(~ 110 kg)时,每组屠宰6头猪,进行胴体和盲肠菌群分析。结果:结果表明,给予益生菌导致体重增加和平均日增重,特别是在断奶和育肥期间。此外,SA和SAM组显著降低了粪便中粪臭素的浓度。此外,添加益生菌与胴体重量增加有关,SAM组的里脊肉重量显著高于CON组。微生物群分析显示,不同组间的类群丰度存在显著差异,并有相应的LEfSe结果。结论:给药枯草芽孢杆菌S14和解淀粉芽孢杆菌S20 (SA组)影响了猪的生长性能,减少了粪便异味,提高了胴体品质。确定的益生菌菌株有望作为饲料添加剂,为养猪业遇到的挑战提供潜在的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Probiotic supplementation regulated swine growth performance, fecal odor reduction and carcass characteristics by modulating intestinal microbiome.

Probiotic supplementation regulated swine growth performance, fecal odor reduction and carcass characteristics by modulating intestinal microbiome.

Probiotic supplementation regulated swine growth performance, fecal odor reduction and carcass characteristics by modulating intestinal microbiome.

Probiotic supplementation regulated swine growth performance, fecal odor reduction and carcass characteristics by modulating intestinal microbiome.

Background: Using probiotics as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoters and reducing odor has received increasing attention in animal science. Despite the extensive investigation into the effects of probiotic administration on swine growth performance and odor reduction by short study durations, the analysis of carcass characteristics and potential mechanistic insights involving gut microbiota and downstream pathways is still few.

Methods: A total of 48 crossbred LYD [(Landrace x Yorkshire) x Duroc] piglets (equal numbers of males and females) were randomly assigned to one of four dietary treatments: control (CON), Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens M1 (M1), M1 + Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S20 (SA group) and M1 + S20 + Bacillus subtilis S14 (SAM group). During the nursery phase (4-8 weeks), pigs were pair-housed and monitored for diarrhea. From 8 to 19 weeks of age, pigs were individually housed and fed grower-finisher diets. Growth performance, blood biochemistry, fecal enzyme activity, and odor-related metabolites were assessed at multiple time points. At market weight (~ 110 kg), six pigs per group were slaughtered for carcass and cecal microbiota analysis.

Results: The results demonstrated that administration of the probiotics led to increased body weight and average daily weight gain, particularly notable during the weaning and finishing periods. Additionally, the SA and SAM groups significantly reduced skatole concentration in feces. Furthermore, probiotic supplementation was associated with increased carcass weight, with the SAM group exhibiting significantly higher tenderloin weight than the CON group. Microbiota analysis revealed taxa exhibiting significant differences in abundance among groups, with corresponding LEfSe findings.

Conclusion: Administering Bacillus subtilis S14 and B. amyloliquefaciens S20 (SA group) impacted growth performance, reduced fecal odor, and enhanced pig carcass quality. The identified probiotic strains hold promise as feed additives, offering a potential solution to challenges encountered by the swine industry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信